Skip to main content

Supporting Request Acceptance with Use Policies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems X (COIN 2014)

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of automating the contribution of resources owned by people to do work for others. This is by providing a means for owners of resources to maintain autonomy over how, when and to whom their resources are used with the specification of use policies governing resources. We give representations of requests for resource usage as a set of conditional norms and a use policy as specifying what norms should and should not be imposed on a resource (i.e. a set of meta-norms). Our main contribution is a reasoner built on the Event Calculus, that detects conflicts between requests and use policies, determining whether the request can be accepted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.raingain.eu/en/actualite/rotterdam-inaugurates-first-large-scale-square-water-storage-greenery-and-sport.

  2. 2.

    More general use policies are possible by extending the framework with variables. This would allow non-specific debtors and creditors to be specified, and the expression of meta-norms about norms where we are not concerned with exact terms.

  3. 3.

    A multi-agent modelling environment http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/.

References

  1. Andrighetto, G., Governatori, G., Noriega, P., van der Torre, L.: Normative multi-agent systems. Dagstuhl Follow-Ups 4, 135–170 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artikis, A., Sergot, M., Paliouras, G.: Run-time composite event recognition. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pp. 69–80. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Permissions and obligations in hierarchical normative systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 109–118 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Torroni, P.: A logic-based, reactive calculus of events. Fundamenta Informaticae 105(1–2), 135–161 (2010)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Torroni, P.: Representing and monitoring social commitments using the event calculus. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 27(1), 85–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chittaro, L., Montanari, A.: Efficient temporal reasoning in the cached event calculus. Comput. Intell. 12(3), 359–382 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. thesis. University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gabbay, D., Horty, J., Parent, X., van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds.): Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, vol. 1. College Publications, London (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganti, R., Ye, F., Lei, H.: Mobile crowdsensing: current state and future challenges. IEEE Commun. Mag. 49(11), 32–39 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in RuleML. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Syst. 14(2–3), 181–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Günay, A., Yolum, P.: Detecting conflicts in commitments. In: Sakama, C., Sardina, S., Vasconcelos, W., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2011. LNCS, vol. 7169, pp. 51–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hübner, J., Sichman, J.S., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multiagent systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. LNCS 2507, 118–128 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, T.C., Liu, Q., Polevoy, G., de Weerdt, M., Dignum, V., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Warnier, M.: Request driven social sensing (demonstration). In: Lomuscio, A., Scerri, P., Bazzan, A., Huhns, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2014), Paris, France (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kowalski, R., Sergot, M.: A logic-based calculus of events. New Gener. Comput. 4(1), 67–95 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. López, FLy, Luck, M., D’Inverno, M.: A normative framework for agent-based systems. Comput. Math. Org. Theor. 12(2–3), 227–250 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parent, X., van der Torre, L.: Input/output logic. In: Gabbay, D., Horty, J., Parent, X., van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, vol. 1, pp. 499–544. College Publications, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shanahan, M.: The event calculus explained. In: Veloso, M.M., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Today. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1600, pp. 409–430. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. van Riemsdijk, M.B., Dennis, L.A., Fisher, M., Hindriks, K.V.: Agent reasoning for norm compliance a semantic approach. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2013), pp. 499–506, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vasconcelos, W.W., Kollingbaum, M.J., Norman, T.J.: Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 19(2), 124–152 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wansing, H.: Nested deontic modalities: another view of parking on highways. Erkenntnis 49(2), 185–199 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yolum, P., Singh, M.: Reasoning about commitments in the event calculus: an approach for specifying and executing protocols. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 42(1–3), 227–253 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. First Int. Joint Conf. Auton. Agents Multiagent Syst. Part 2, 527–534 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thomas C. King—supported by the SHINE (http://www.shine.tudelft.nl) project of TU Delft. Authors would like to thank anonymous reviewers of COIN-14 for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas C. King .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

King, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Dignum, V., Jonker, C.M. (2015). Supporting Request Acceptance with Use Policies. In: Ghose, A., Oren, N., Telang, P., Thangarajah, J. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems X. COIN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9372. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25419-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25420-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics