Abstract
In many industrial applications, one is interested in finding an optimal layout of an object, which often leads to PDE-constrained shape optimization problems. Such problems can be approached by shape optimization methods, where a domain is altered by smooth deformation of its boundary, or by means of topology optimization methods, which in addition can alter the connectivity of the initial design. We give an overview over established topology optimization methods and focus on an approach based on the sensitivity of the cost function with respect to a topological perturbation of the domain, called the topological derivative. We illustrate a way to derive this sensitivity and discuss the additional difficulties arising in the case of a nonlinear PDE constraint. We show numerical results for the optimization of an electric motor which are obtained by a combination of two methods: a level set algorithm which is based on the topological derivative, and a shape optimization method together with a special treatment of the evolving material interface which assures accurate approximate solutions to the underlying PDE constraint as well as a smooth final design.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
G. Allaire. Shape optimization by the homogenization method. Applied mathematical sciences. Springer, New York, 2002.
H. Ammari and H. Kang. Polarization and Moment Tensors. Springer-Verlag New York, 2007.
S. Amstutz. Sensitivity analysis with respect to a local perturbation of the material property. Asymptotic analysis, 49(1), 2006.
S. Amstutz. Analysis of a level set method for topology optimization. Optimization Methods and Software - Advances in Shape an Topology Optimization: Theory, Numerics and New Application Areas, 26(4–5):555–573, 2011.
S. Amstutz and H. Andrä. A new algorithm for topology optimization using a level-set method. Journal of Computational Physics, 216(2):573–588, 2006.
S. Amstutz and A. Bonnafé. Topological derivatives for a class of quasilinear elliptic equations. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées.
T. Belytschko, R. Gracie, and G. Ventura. A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 17(4), 2009.
M. P. Bendsøe. Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural Optimization, 1(4):193–202, 1989.
M. P. Bendsoe and N. Kikuchi. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 71(2):197–224, Nov. 1988.
M. P. Bendsøe and O. Sigmund. Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, 2003.
A. Binder. Elektrische Maschinen und Antriebe: Grundlagen, Betriebsverhalten. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, 2012.
M. Burger and R. Stainko. Phase-field relaxation of topology optimization with local stress constraints. SIAM J. Control Optim., 45(4):1447–1466, 2006.
E. Burman, S. Claus, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, and A. Massing. CutFEM: Discretizing geometry and partial differential equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 104(7):472–501, 2015.
F. Campelo, J. Ramırez, and H. Igarashi. A survey of topology optimization in electromagnetics: considerations and current trends. 2010.
A. N. Christiansen, M. Nobel-Jørgensen, N. Aage, O. Sigmund, and J. A. Bærentzen. Topology optimization using an explicit interface representation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 49(3):387–399, 2014.
M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio. Shapes and geometries, volume 22 of Advances in Design and Control. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, second edition, 2011. Metrics, analysis, differential calculus, and optimization.
H. A. Eschenauer, V. V. Kobelev, and A. Schumacher. Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structures. Structural optimization, 8(1):42–51, 1994.
S. Frei and T. Richter. A locally modified parametric finite element method for interface problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 52(5):2315–2334, 2014.
T.-P. Fries and T. Belytschko. The extended/generalized finite element method: An overview of the method and its applications. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 84(3):253–304, 2010.
P. Gangl. Sensitivity-based topology and shape optimization with application to electrical machines. PhD thesis, Johannes Kepler University Linz, 2016.
P. Gangl, U. Langer, A. Laurain, H. Meftahi, and K. Sturm. Shape optimization of an electric motor subject to nonlinear magnetostatics. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37(6):B1002–B1025, 2015.
H. Garcke, C. Hecht, M. Hinze, and C. Kahle. Numerical approximation of phase field based shape and topology optimization for fluids. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 37(4):A1846–A1871, 2015.
A. Hansbo and P. Hansbo. An unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche’s method, for elliptic interface problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 191(47–48):5537 – 5552, 2002.
R. Hiptmair, A. Paganini, and S. Sargheini. Comparison of approximate shape gradients. BIT, 55(2):459–485, 2015.
A. Laurain and K. Sturm. Distributed shape derivative via averaged adjoint method and applications. ESAIM: M2AN, 50(4):1241–1267, 2016.
Z. Li. The immersed interface method using a finite element formulation. Appl. Num. Math., 27:253–267, 1998.
S. Osher and J. A. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvature dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79(1):12–49, 1988.
C. Pechstein and B. Jüttler. Monotonicity-preserving interproximation of B-H-curves. J. Comp. App. Math., 196:45–57, 2006.
O. Sigmund and K. Maute. Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6):1031–1055, 2013.
O. Sigmund and J. Petersson. Numerical instabilities in topology optimization: A survey on procedures dealing with checkerboards, mesh-dependencies and local minima. Structural Optimization, 16(1):68–75, 1998.
J. Sokołowski and A. Zochowski. On the topological derivative in shape optimization. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 37(4):1251–1272, 1999.
J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio. Introduction to shape optimization, volume 16 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992. Shape sensitivity analysis.
K. Sturm. Minimax Lagrangian approach to the differentiability of nonlinear PDE constrained shape functions without saddle point assumption. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53(4):2017–2039, 2015.
N. P. van Dijk, K. Maute, M. Langelaar, and F. van Keulen. Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(3): 437–472, 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gangl, P. (2018). Sensitivity-Based Topology and Shape Optimization with Application to Electric Motors. In: Antil, H., Kouri, D.P., Lacasse, MD., Ridzal, D. (eds) Frontiers in PDE-Constrained Optimization. The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications, vol 163. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8636-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8636-1_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8635-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8636-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)