Skip to main content

Understanding the Population Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance for Marine Mammals

  • Conference paper
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II

Abstract

Loud anthropogenic underwater noise, such as that associated with sonar operations, pile driving, or seismic surveys, can cause behavioral and physiological disturbance to many animals that may affect their survival or ability to breed. However, no formal framework for assessing the population-level consequences of this disturbance is currently available. We describe an interim version of a framework developed by a working group on the population consequences of disturbance, funded by the US Office of Naval Research through the University of California, that can be used to assess the effects of offshore renewable energy developments on marine mammal populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aspinall W (2010) A route to more tractable expert advice. Nature 463:294–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeRuiter SL, Southall BL, Calambokidis J, Zimmer WM, Sadykova D, Falcone EA, Friedlaender AS, Joseph JE, Moretti D, Schorr GS, Thomas L, Tyack PL (2013) First direct measurements of behavioural responses by Cuvier’s beaked whales to mid-frequency active sonar. Biol Lett 9:20130223. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2013.0223

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbogen JA, Southall BL, DeRuiter SL, Calambokidis J, Friedlaender AS, Hazen EL, Falcone EA, Schorr GS, Douglas A, Moretti DJ, Kyburg C, McKenna MF, Tyack PL (2013) Blue whales respond to simulated mid-frequency military sonar. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20130657. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D (2003) Effects of tour boats on the behaviour of bottlenose dolphins: Using Markov chains to model anthropogenic impacts. Conserv Biol 17:1785–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D (2004) The hidden cost of tourism: detecting long-term effects of tourism using behavioral information. Ecol Soc 9:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TG, Burgman MA, Fidler F, Kuhnert PM, Low-Choy S, McBride M, Mengersen K (2012) Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conserv Biol 26:29–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative conservation biology: Theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabe-Nielsen J, Tougaard J, Teilmann J, Sveegaard S (2011) Effects of wind farms on harbour porpoise behaviour and population dynamics. Report commissioned by the Environmental Group under the Danish Environmental Monitoring Programme. Scientific report from Danish Centre for Environment and Energy No. 1, Danish Centre for Environment and Energy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • New LF, Clark JS, Costa DP, Fleishman E, Hindell MA, Klanjšček T, Lusseau D, Kraus S, McMahon CR, Robinson PW, Schick RS, Schwarz LK, Simmons SE, Thomas L, Tyack P, Harwood J (2014) Assessing the population-level effects of disturbance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 496:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New LF, Harwood J, Thomas L, Donovan C, Clark JS, Hastie G, Thompson PM, Cheney B, Scott-Hayward L, Lusseau D (2013a) Modelling the biological significance of behavioural change in coastal bottlenose dolphins in response to disturbance. Funct Ecol 27:314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New LF, Moretti DJ, Hooker SK, Costa DP, Simmons SE (2013b) Using energetic models to investigate the survival and reproduction of beaked whales (family Ziphiidae). PLoS ONE 8, e68725. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.006872

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: Determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolland RM, Parks SE, Hunt KE, Castellote M, Corkeron PJ, Nowacek DP, Wasser SK, Kraus SD (2012) Evidence that ship noise increases stress in right whales. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:2363–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ TC, Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Starr JM, Kivimäki M, Batty GD (2012) Association between psychological distress and mortality: Individual participant pooled analysis of 10 prospective cohort studies. Brit Med J 345, e4933

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: Initial scientific recommendations. Aquat Mamm 33:411–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speirs-Bridge A, Fidler F, McBride M, Flander L, Cumming G, Burgman M (2010) Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Anal 30:512–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson PM, Hastie GD, Nedwell J, Barham R, Brookes KL, Cordes LS, Bailey H, McLean N (2013) Framework for assessing impacts of pile-driving noise from offshore wind farm construction on a harbour seal population. Environ Impact Assess Rev 43:73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougaard J, Kyhn LA, Amundin M, Wennerberg D, Bordin C (2012) Behavioral reactions of harbor porpoise to pile-driving noise. In: Popper AN, Hawkins AD (eds) Effects of noise on aquatic life. Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 730th edn. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, pp 277–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Work on the development of the interim population consequences of disturbance protocol was supported by contracts to Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) Marine from The Crown Estate, Marine Scotland, the Department for Energy and Climate Change, and the Natural Environment Research Council. The work benefited greatly from discussions with participants in a working group supported by Office of Naval Research Grants N00014-09-1-0896 to the University of California, Santa Barbara and N00014-12-1-0274 to the University of California, Davis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Harwood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harwood, J. et al. (2016). Understanding the Population Consequences of Acoustic Disturbance for Marine Mammals. In: Popper, A., Hawkins, A. (eds) The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 875. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2981-8_49

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics