Abstract
Feminist critiques of traditional psychological approaches have generated thorough feminist revisions most notably in psychoanalytic and developmental theory. Although behaviorism has attracted strong objections from feminist critics, claims of its antithetical positioning vis-a-vis feminist theory construction have practically remained unchallenged. A preliminary step in formulating ‘grounds for a synthesis is to clarify the multiple meanings of behaviorism. Specifically, the fusion of Watson’s methodological behaviorism and Skinner’s radical behaviorism in the literature must be disentangled in order to address the latter’s potential as a conceptual framework for constructing feminist theory. Key conceptual features of radical behaviorism that suggest its potential as a vehicle for building a feminist epistemology include: radical behaviorism’s contextualistic world view, its interpretation of agency, its treatment of private experience and self knowledge, and its understanding of the pivotal functions of the verbal community.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aebischer, V. (1988). Knowledge as a result of conflicting intergroup relations. In M. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 142–151). New York: University Press.
Baer, D.M. (1976). The organism as host. Human Development, 19, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271519
Banaji, M.R., (1993). The psychology of gender: A perspective on perspectives. In A.E. Beall & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 251–273). New York: Guilford Press.
Baum, W.M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism—Science behavior and culture. New York: Harper Collins.
Burman, E. (1992). Feminism and discourse in developmental psychology: Power, subjectivity and interpretation. Feminism and Psychology, 2, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353592021004
Calkins, M.W. (1986). Community of ideas of men and women. Psychological Review, 3, 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0064618
Carr, E.G. (1993). Behavior analysis is not ultimately about behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 47–49.
Chiesa, M. (1992). Radical behaviorism and scientific frameworks. American Psychologist, 47, 1287–1311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1287
Chodorow, N. (1978) The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Comas-Diaz, L. (1991). Feminism and diversity in psychology: The case of women of color. Psychology of Women Qurterly, 15, 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00433.x
Crawford, M. (1989). Agreeing to differ: Feminist epistemologies and women’s ways of knowing, In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought (pp. 128–145). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Crawford, M., & Maracek, J. (1989). Psychology reconstructs the female, 1968–1988. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1989.tb00993.x
Day, W. (1992a). The historical antecedents of contemporary behaviorism. In S. Leigland (Ed.), Radical behaviorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy (pp. 13–58). Reno, Nevada, Context Press.
Day, W. (1992b). On the difference between radical and methodological behaviorism. In S. Leigland (Ed.), Radical behaviorism: Willard Day on psychology and philosophy (pp. 61–71). Reno, Nevada, Context Press.
Fee, E. (1986). Critiques of modern science: The relationship of feminism to other radical epistemologies. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (pp. 42–56). New York: Pergamon.
Flax, J. (1978). The conflict between nurturance and autonomy in mother-daughter relationships and within feminism. Feminist Studies, 4, 171–189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177468
Furumoto, L. (1988). Mary Whiton Calkins (1863–1930). In A. N. O’Connell & N. F. Russo (Eds.), Women in psychology: A bibliographical sourcebook (pp. 57–65). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Furumoto, L. & Scarborough, E. (1986). Placing women in the history of psychology: The first American women psychologists. American Psychologist, 41, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.1.35
Gergen, K. J. (1988). Feminist critique of science and the challenge of social epistemology. In. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 124–141). New York: University Press.
Gilbert, L.A. & Osipow, S.H. (1991). Feminist contributions to counseling psychology. Psychology of Women Qurterly, 15, 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00428.x
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hall, M., Kitzinger, C, Loulan, J., & Perkins, R. (1992). The spoken word: Lesbian psychology, lesbian politics. Feminism and Psychology, 2, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353592021002
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hare-Mustin, R.T., & Marecek, J. (1990). Gender and the meaning of difference: Postmodernism and psychology. In R.T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 22–64). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hayes, S. C, Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s world hypotheses: A study in evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-97
Hollingworth, L.S. (1914). Variability as related to sex differences in achievement. American Journal of Sociology, 19, 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/212287
Hollingworth, L.S. (1916). Social devices for impelling women to bear and rear children. American Journal of Sociology, 22, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1086/212572
Iversen, I.H. (1992). Skinner’s early research: From reflexology to operant conditioning. American Psychologist, 47, 1318–1328. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1318
Jacklin, C.N. & McBride-Chang, C. (1991). The effects of feminist scholarship on developmental psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 549–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00429.x
Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York: Harper Collins.
Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewin, M. & Wild, C.L. (1991). The impact of the feminist critique on tests, assessment, and cognitive psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00432.x
Lott, B. (1990). Dual nature of learned behavior: The challenge to feminist psychology. In R.T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 65–101). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lott, B. (1991). Social psychology: Humanist roots and feminist future. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00426.x
Lott, B., & Maluso, D, (1993). The social learning of gender. In A. E. Beall & RJ. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 99–123). New York: Guilford Press.
Marecek, J. & Hare-Mustin, R.T. (1991). A short history of the future: Feminism and clinical psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, p. 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00427.x
Morawski, J.G. (1990). Epistemology in psychology. In R.T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 150–183). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Morawski, J.G. & Agronik, G. (1991). A restive legacy: The history of feminist work in experimental and cognitive psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00431.x
Morris, E. K. (1988). Contextualism: The world view of behavior analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 289–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(88)90063-X
Morris, E. K. (1993a). Behavior analysis and mechanism: One is not the other.. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 25–43.
Morris, E. K. (1993b). Mechanism and contextualism in behavior analysis: Just some observations.. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 255–268.
O’Connell, A. N. & Russo, N.F. (1991). Women’s heritage in psychology: Past and present. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00425.x
O’Donnell, J.M. (1985). The origins of behaviorism: American psychology, 1870–1920. New York: New York University Press.
Palmer, D. C, & Donahoe, J. W. (1992). Essentialism and selectionism in cognitive science and behavior analysis. American Psychologist, 47, 1344–1358. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1344
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Russo, N.F. & Denmark, F.L. (1987). Contributions of women to psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001431
Russo, N. F. & O’Connell, A. N. (1980). Models from our past: Psychology’s foremothers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 11–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb01032.x
Sherif, C.W. (1979). Bias in psychology. In J.A. Sherman & E.T. Beck (Eds.), The prism of sex: Essays in the sociology of knowledge (pp.93–133). Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Skinner, B.F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Skinner, B.F. (1959). Cumulative record: A selection of papers. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B.F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement-A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Skinner, B.F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B.F. (1984). (Reply to Staddon). Behavioral and brain sciences, 7, 707.
Thompson, H. B. (1906). The mental traits of sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Todd, J.T. & Morris, E.K. (1983). Misconception and miseducation: Presentations of radical behaviorism in psychology textbooks. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 153–160.
Todd, J.T. & Morris, E.K. (1992). Case histories in the great power of misrepresentation. American Psychologist, 47, 1441–1453. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1441
Travis, C.B., Gressley, D.L. & Crumpler, CA. (1991). Feminist contributions to health psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00430.x
Unger, R.K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1983.tb00614.x
Unger, R.K. (1986). Looking toward the future by looking at the past: Social activism and social history. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1986.tb00218.x
Unger, R.K. (1988). Psychological, feminist, and personal epistemology: Transcending contradiction. In. M. McCanney Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 124–141). New York: University Press.
Unger, R.K. (1989). Sex, gender, and epistemology. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought (pp. 17–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428
Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Watson, J. B. (1924) Behaviorism. New York: People’s Institute.
Watson, J. B. (1927). The behaviorist looks at instincts. Harper’s Monthly Magazine, 155, 228–235.
Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (rev. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. Columbia University Press, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This manuscript was originally published in Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19 (1995), 161–179. Reprinted with the permission of Cambridge University Press. I thank Judy Kinnie and Nan Mitchell for their help in the preparation of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruiz, M.R. B. F. Skinner’S Radical Behaviorism: Historical Misconstructions and Grounds for Feminist Reconstructions. Behav. Soc. Iss. 5, 29–44 (1995). https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v5i2.221
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v5i2.221