Skip to main content

Rosi Braidotti’s Nomadic Subjects

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies

Abstract

Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory is Rosi Braidotti’s notorious foundation of her feminist psychosocial bridge that takes us from critique to creativity, as I will argue in this chapter. Written in the early 1990s, the book builds theoretical alliances and opens dialogue across feminist theory and movements, holding onto the transformative spaces of inventiveness of feminist praxis, beyond the constrictions of the life of “phallogocentric” power.

Subjectivity, ontology, sexual difference, and Women’s studies (rather than the more contemporary term Gender Studies) are philosophical and political concepts weaved through the tome; themes that up to this day characterize Braidotti’s contribution to feminist philosophy and resonate closely with the broader field of Psychosocial Studies. The proposal of the book, or Braidotti’s figuration, is that of the “nomadic subject,” or a subject that is embodied, inscribed in history and yet connected and relational and carved beyond an idea of a subject that is anchored in identification. Psychoanalysis, in its potencies and shortcomings, features widely in her argument, which demonstrates her process of thinking-with, rather than against, feminist thought both from European (mostly French, Italian, and German-inspired) and Anglophone traditions. Expanding on “difference” as a plural, affirmative, and nuanced category of Psychosocial thinking, Nomadic Subjects offers a solid and intimate ground for Braidotti’s work over the last three decades and her contributions to research and practice in our field. In this chapter, we will explore central elements of her work whilst addressing the resistances to “nomadic” thinking by contemporary psychoanalytic feminist scholars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While in this period of her writing Braidotti was a pioneer of European feminist thought, in her more recent work, a consistent and in-depth dialogue with non-Western, Decolonial and Indigenous thought is central to her argument of both Nomadic thinking and the Posthuman. See: Part 3 “Nomadic Citizenship” of Nomadic Theory (Braidotti, 2011b) and Chapter 3 Decentring Anthropos: Ecofeminism Revisited in Posthuman Feminism (Braidotti, 2022).

  2. 2.

    In the second edition of Nomadic Subjects, Braidotti includes a whole concluding chapter where she is interviewed by Andrja Sevic about the question of gender, sexuality, sexual identity, and her focus on sexual difference instead. There she explains that one difference between her approach and that of queer theory is that she does not consider heteronormativity as “the” matrix of power alone; since power is not centralised. Braidotti responds: “It is absolutely true that my nomadic subject is very compatible with queering practices, so long as we agree on the terms and the structure of the exercise. Sexuality for me is not linguistically mediated, but rather an embodied practice of experimentation with multiple relations in an affirmative manner. I have devoted a large amount of my book Metamorphoses to a critique of queer theory in Butler’s work, and she responded in Undoing Gender. This has often led to some sort of polarization among younger theorists, as if one felt compelled to choose either/or. Neither of us agrees with easy polarizations, but we do work with different paradigms” (Braidotti, 2011a, p. 290).

  3. 3.

    Preciado does not draw directly on Braidotti in this published speech, despite being also influenced by Deleuze and Guattari and of making similar criticisms to the psychoanalytic Oedipal ideology. However, Preciado is referenced by Braidotti (2022) in her more recent work.

  4. 4.

    Elisabeth Roudinesco, the grand historian of French psychoanalysis and biographer of Lacan, called the book “unconvincing” in her review for the French newspaper Le Monde. The title and subtitle of her article read: “Le philosophe trans s’appuie sur son expÉrience pour appeler à « dÉcoloniser » l’inconscient. Sans convaincre.”(Roudinesco, 2020).

  5. 5.

    Julia Kristeva, another important thinker of French Feminism, argues that in patriarchy to access subjectivity, a separation from the mother’s body is made necessary, resulting in a type of melancholia (Kristeva, 1980, 1987).

  6. 6.

    Bracha Ettinger, a contemporary feminist psychoanalyst also subscribes to the idea of symbolic gestation as the ground for a feminine ethics of togetherness and co-poiesis which more recently (2019) she has tried to de-essentialise. See: Ettinger, 2005, 2006 and 2019.

References

  • Baraitser, L. (2015). Temporal drag: Transdisciplinarity and the ‘case’ of psychosocial studies. Theory, Culture and Society, 32(5–6), 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bono, P., & Kemp, S. (1991). Italian feminist thought: A reader. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1991). Patters of dissonance. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2010). Powers of affirmation: Response to Lisa Baraitser, Patrick Hanafin and Clare Hemmings by Rosi Braidotti. Subjectivity, 3, 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2011a). Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory (2nd ed.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2011b). Nomadic theory. The portable Rosi Braidotti. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013a) Conversation with Rosi Braidotti. nY. 19 June 2013. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ny-web.be/artikels/conversation-rosi-braidotti/. Accessed 29 June 2022.

  • Braidotti, R. (2013b). Becoming-world. In R. Braidotti, P. Hanafin, & B. Blaagaard (Eds.), After cosmopolitanism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2014). Writing as a nomadic subject. Comparative Critical Studies, 11(2–3), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture and Society, 36(6), 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2020). ‘We’ are in this together, but we are not one and the same. Bioethical Inquiry, 17, 465–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2022). Posthuman feminism. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R., & Butler, J. (1994). Feminism by any other name. Differences, 6(2–3), 27–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (1989). Between feminism and psychoanalysis. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2020). The force of nonviolence. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigarini, L. (1995). La Politica del Desiderio. Pratiche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copjec, J. (1994). Read my desire: Lacan against the historicists. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus – Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus – Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, B. (2005). Copoiesis. Ephemera, 5(X), 703–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, B. (2006). The matrixial borderspace. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettinger, B. (2019). Beyond the death-drive, beyond the life-drive: Being- toward-birthing with being-toward-birth; Copoiesis and the Matrixial Eros— Metafeminist notes. In P. De Assis & P. Giudici (Eds.), Aberrant nuptials: Deleuze and artistic research. Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2019). Re-enchanting the world: Feminism and the politics of the commons. PM Press/Kairos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouque, A. (1995) Il y a deux sexes: essais de fÉminologie. 1989–1995. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherovici, P. (2018). Anxious? Castration is the solution! Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 38(1), 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, L. (1984). Racismo e Sexismo na Cultura Brasileira. Revista Ciências Sociais Hoje, Anpocs, 1984, 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1979). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1982). An ethics of sexual difference. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. (1987). Black sun: Depression and melancholia. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1960) The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious. In: Écrits: The first complete edition in English (2006) [trans. Bruce Fink]. W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1964). Position of the unconscious. In: Écrits: The first complete edition in English (2006) [trans. Bruce Fink], W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miñoso, Y.E. (2020) Why we need decolonial feminism: Differentiation and co-constitutional domination in Western modernity. Afterall. 1st July 2020. Online. Available at https://www.afterall.org/article/why-we-need-decolonial-feminism-differentiation-and-co-constitutional-domination-of-western-modernit. Accessed 29 June 2022

  • Moskowitz, D. A., Rendina, H. J., Alvarado Avila, A., & Mustanski, B. (2022). Demographic and social factors impacting coming out as a sexual minority among generation-Z teenage boys. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 9(2), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyěwùmí, O. (1997). The invention of women: Making and African sense of Western gender discourses. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preciado, P. B. (2020). Je suis um Monstre qui vous parle. Rapport pour une academie de psychanalystes. Bernard Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2018). Our psychiatric future: The politics of mental health. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roudinesco, E. (2020) Je suis un monstre qui vous parle » : la « psychanalyse mutante » de Paul B. Preciado. Le Monde. 12 June 2020. [Online] Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/livres/article/2020/06/12/je-suis-un-monstre-quivous-parle-la-psychanalyse-mutante-de-paul-b-preciado_6042598_3260.html. Accessed 29 June 2022.

  • Segal, L., Chatzidakis, A., Hakim, J., Littler, J., & Rottenberg, C. (2020). The care manifesto. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segato, R. (2012). Gênero e Colonialidade: em busca de chaves de leitura e de um vocabulário estratégico descolonial’ e-cadernos CES. Online. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/eces/1533. Accessed 29 June 2022.

  • Tamboukou, M. (2021). Feeling the real: The non-nomadic subject of feminism. Theory, Culture and Society, 38(3), 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VICE Media Group. (2020). The VICE guide for 2030. Online, Available at: https://2030.vice.com/identity/. Accessed 29 June 2022.

  • Vergès, F. (2019). A decolonial feminism. Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamboni, C. (2019). La pratica dell’inconscio. Un ponte tra ‘Psychanalyse et Politique’, Antoinette Fouque e il pensiero femminista italiano. Per Amore del Mondo. Vol 16 (2019) [Online] Available at: http://www.diotimafilosofe.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Zamboni_Inconscio-tra-Fouque-e-Cigarini-Parigi-2016-1.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2022.

  • Zupančič, A. (2017). What is sex? MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Carolina Minozzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Minozzo, A.C. (2022). Rosi Braidotti’s Nomadic Subjects. In: Frosh, S., Vyrgioti, M., Walsh, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Psychosocial Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61510-9_49-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61510-9_49-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61510-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61510-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics