Shifting Up and Back

The European Turn in Canadian Refugee Policy

Abstract

During the last decade, Canada’s immigration and citizenship policies have been radically transformed. Hardly any aspect has been left untouched. That humanitarian migration has also been restricted and transformed has generally been linked to the worldwide “securitization” of migration. This paper argues that the timing and character of a number of key changes also represent a European turn of Canada’s refugee policy, which has seen Canada change from a policy innovator and humanitarian leader to a student, follower and adaptor of a key set of restrictionist asylum policies practiced in Europe.

References

  1. Abell, N. A. (1997). Safe Country Provisions in Canada and in the European Union: A Critical Assessment. International Migration Review, 31(3): 569–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abu-Laban, Y. (1998). Welcome/STAY OUT: The Contradiction of Canadian Integration and Immigration Policies at the Millennium. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 20(3): 190–211.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alboim, N., & Cohl, K. (October 2012). Shaping the Future: Canada’s Rapidly Changing Immigration Policies. Toronto: Maytree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, C. G. (2010). Restricting Rights, Losing Control: The Politics of Control over Asylum Seekers in Liberal-Democratic States — Lessons from the Canadian Case, 1951–1989. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(4): 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbel, E. (2013). Shifting Borders and the Boundaries of Rights: Examining the Safe Third Country Agreement between Canada and the United States. International Journal of Refugee Law, 25 (1): forthcoming.

  6. Brunet-Jailly, E. (2006). Security and Border Security Policies: Perimeter or Smart Border? A Comparison of the European Union and Canadian-American Border Security Regimes. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 21(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Canada, C. a. I. (2006). Canada-United States Safe Third Country Agreement Review: A Partnership for Protection, Year One Review.

  8. Carrera, S., De Somer, M., & Petkova, B. (2012). The Court of Justice of the European Union as a Fundamental Rights Tribunal: Challenges for the Effective Delivery of Fundamental Rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, No. 49 (August).

  9. Clarkson, S. (2008). Does North America Exist? Governing the Continent After NAFTA and 9/11. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Costello, C. (2005). The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation of Safe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling of International Protection? European journal of Migration and Law, 7: 35–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dauvergne, C. (2005). Humanitarianism, Identity and Nation: Migration Laws of Canada and Australia. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dauvergne, C. (2008). Making People Illegal: What Globalization Means for Migration and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Dirks, G. E. (1995). Controversy and Complexity: Canadian Immigration Policy During the 1980s. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dobrowolsky, A. (2011). The Intended and Unintended Effects of a New Immigration Strategy: Insights from Nova Scotia’s Provincial Nominee Program. Studies in Political Economy, 87 (Spring): 109–142.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forest, J. J. F. (Ed.) (2006). Homeland Security: Protecting America’s Targets (Vol. 1), Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Garnier, A. (2010). Are States in Control of their Borders? Testing the Venue-Shopping Approach in the Australian Context, Working Paper Series: Graduate Centre Humanities and Social Science of the Research Academy Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Graziano, P., & Vink, M. (Eds.). (2007). Europeanization: New Research Agendas Basingstoke: Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  18. Guild, E. (2006). The Europeanisation of Europe’s Asylum Policy. International Journal of Refugee Law, 18: 630–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guiraudon, V. (2000). European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-making as Venue Shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2): 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guiraudon, V. (2001). Weak Weapons of the Weak? Transnational Mobilization around Migration in the European Union. In D. Imig & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gurzu, A. (2012). Safe Country of Origin List at the EU Level: the Bargaining Process and the Implications. Journal of European and Russian Affairs, 7(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Irvine, J. A. S. (2011). Canadian Refugee Policy: Understanding the Role of International Bureaucratic Networks in Domestic Paradigm Change. In G. Skogstad (Ed.), Policy Paradigms, Transnationalism and Domestic Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jimenez, E., & Crépeau, F. (2002). The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. Horizons: Policy Research Initiative, 5(2): 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kaunert, C., & Léonard, S. (2012). The Development of the EU Asylum Policy: Venue-Shopping in Perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(9): 1396–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelley, N., & Trebilcock, M. (1998). The Making of the Mosaic: a History of Canada’s Immigration Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kernerman, G. (2008). Refugee Interdiction at Heaven’s Gate. Government and Opposition, 43(2): 230–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krikorian, J. D. (2012). International Trade Law and Domestic Policy: Canada, the United States and the WTO. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lavenex, S. (1999). Safe Third Countries: Extending the EU Asylum and Immigration Policies to East and Central Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lavenex, S. (2001). The Europeanization of Refugee Policies: Normative Challenges and Institutional Legacies. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(5): 851–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Macklin, A. (2005). Disappearing Refugees: Reflections of the Canada-U.S. Safe Third Country Agreement. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 36: 365–426.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moravcsik, A. (1998). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olsen, J. P. (2002). The Many Faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (5).

  33. Peers, S. (2011). EU Justice and Home Affairs Law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Review, I. L. (1997). Not Just Numbers: A Canadian Framework for Future Immigration. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Salter, M. B. (2007). Canadian Post 9/11 Border Security and Spillover Securitization: Smart, Safe, Sovereign? In M. Orsini & M. Smith (Eds.), Critical Policy Studies. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shachar, A. (2006). Race for Talent: Highly Skilled Migrants and Competitive Immigration Regimes. New York University Law Review, 81: 148–206.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Soennecken, D. (2013a). Extending Hospitality: History, Courts and the Executive. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 60: 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soennecken, D. (2013b). The Managerialization of Refugee Determinations in Canada. Droit et Societé, 84(2): 291–311.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stoffman, D. (2002). Who Gets In: What’s Wrong with Canada’s Immigration Program — and How to Fix It. Toronto: Macfarlane Walter and Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thouez, C., & Channac, F. (2006). Shaping International Migration Policy: The Role of Regional Consultative Processes. West European Politics, 29(2): 370–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Varsanyi, M. W. (2008). Rescaling the “Alien,” Rescaled Personhood: Neoliberalism, Immigration and the State. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 98(4): 877–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Watson, S. (2009). The Securitisation of Humanitiarian Migration: Digging Moats and Sinking Boats. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Soennecken.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soennecken, D. Shifting Up and Back. CMS 2, 101–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5117/CMS2014.1.SOEN

Download citation

Keywords

  • refugee determinations
  • Canada
  • Europe
  • Europeanization
  • venue shopping
  • safe third country
  • safe country of origin