Skip to main content
Log in

Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures Treated by Hybrid External Fixation System

A correlation of followup computed tomography derived quality of reduction with clinical results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Tibial plateau fractures are common due to high energy injuries. The principles of treatment include respect for the soft tissues, restoring the congruity of the articular surface and reduction of the anatomic alignment of the lower limb to enable early movement of the knee joint. There are various surgical fixation methods that can achieve these principles of treatment. Recognition of the particular fracture pattern is important, as this guides the surgical approach required in order to adequately stabilize the fracture. This study evaluates the results of the combined treatment of external fixator and limited internal fixation along with the advantages using postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan after implant removal.

Materials and Methods

55 patients with a mean age of 42 years (range 17–65 years) with tibial plateau fracture, were managed in our institution between October 2010 and September 2013., Twenty fractures were classified as Schatzker VI and 35 as Schatzker V. There were 8 open fractures (2 Gustilo Anderson 3A and 6 Gustilo Anderson 2). All fractures were treated with closed reduction and hybrid external fixation (n = 21/38.2%) or with minimal open reduction internal fixation and a hybrid system (n = 34/61.8%). After the removal of the fixators, CT-scan was programmed for all the cases, for correlation with the results. At final followup, the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) was administered.

Results

All patients were evaluated with a minimum of 12 months (range 12–21 months) followup. Average time to union was 15.5 weeks (range 13–19 weeks). The postoperative joint congruity as evaluated in the postoperative CT-scan was <2 mm of articular step-off in 8 patients (14.5%), between 2 and 4 mm in 18 patients (32.7%) and over 4 mm in 29 (52.7%). The injured limb mechanical axis was restored within 5° compared to the contralateral limb in 36 cases (65%) and with an angulation >5° in 19 cases (35%). Patients with residual joint depression <3.5 mm had a 95% chance of having excellent AKSS knee score results and 80% chance of having excellent AKSS function scores. On the other hand, residual joint depression of >4.5 mm displayed a 100% chance of getting poor-fair scores both in AKSS knee and AKSS function score. The association of a postoperative mechanical axis within 5° of the contralateral limb and improved knee scores was statistically significant for the AKSS function and total scores but not for the AKSS knee score. The AKSS was negatively correlated with postoperative joint depression magnitude which was statistically significant. Only the amount of joint collapse was verified as a prognostic factor in a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

The postoperative CT-scan shows important information about bone healing, and an exact image of the reduction and the shaft alignment. Postoperative radiographs may have led to an underestimation of the degree of residual displacement. On the contrary, CT-scan demonstrates the exact grade of articular displacement and depending on CT-scan results one can better manage the postoperative rehabilitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papagelopoulos PJ, Partsinevelos AA, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF, Korres DS, Soucacos PN. Complications after tibia plateau fracture surgery. Injury 2006;37:475–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schatzker J. Fractures of the tibial plateau. In: Schatzker J, Tile M, editors. Rationale of Operative Fracture Care. New York: Springer; 1987. p. 279–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Tscherne H, Lobenhoffer P. Tibial plateau fractures. Management and expected results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;292 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore TM, Patzakis MJ, Harvey JP. Tibial plateau fractures: Definition, demographics, treatment rationale, and long term results of closed traction management or operative reduction. J Orthop Trauma 1987;1:97–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallik AR, Covall DJ, Whitelaw GP. Internal versus external fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 1992;21:1433–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barei DP, Nork SE, Mills WJ, Henley MB, Benirschke SK. Complications associated with internal fixation of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures utilizing a two-incision technique. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:649–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Young MJ, Barrack RL. Complications of internal fixation of tibial plateau fractures. Orthop Rev 1994;23:149–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruffolo MR, Gettys FK, Montijo HE, Seymour RB, Karunakar MA. Complications of high-energy bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with dual plating through 2 incisions. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaudinez RF, Mallik AR, Szporn M. Hybrid external fixation of comminuted tibial plateau fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996;328 203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh H, Misra RK, Kaur M. Management of proximal tibia fractures using wire based circular external fixator. J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:RC01–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Piper KJ, Won HY, Ellis AM. Hybrid external fixation in complex tibial plateau and plafond fractures: An Australian audit of outcomes. Injury 2005;36:178–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson JT, Ripple S, Hoshaw SJ, Fhyrie D. Hybrid external fixation for tibial plateau fractures: Clinical and biomechanical correlation. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:199–209, ix.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;248 13–4.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Conserva V, Vicenti G, Allegretti G, Filipponi M, Monno A, Picca G, et al. Retrospective review of tibial plateau fractures treated by two methods without staging. Injury 2015;46:1951–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katsenis D, Dendrinos G, Kouris A, Savas N, Schoinochoritis N, Pogiatzis K. Combination of fine wire fixation and limited internal fixation for high-energy tibial plateau fractures: Functional results at minimum 5-year followup. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:493–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang G, Zhai Q, Zhu Y, Sun H, Putnis S, Luo C. The incidence of posterior tibial plateau fracture: An investigation of 525 fractures by using a CT-based classification system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:929–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu Y, Yang G, Luo CF, Smith WR, Hu CF, Gao H, et al. Computed tomography-based three-column classification in tibial plateau fractures: Introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73:731–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:683–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kokkalis ZT, Iliopoulos ID, Pantazis C, Panagiotopoulos E. What’s new in the management of complex tibial plateau fractures? Injury 2016;47:1162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goff T, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV. Use of bone graft substitutes in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Injury 2013;44 Suppl 1:S86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Babis GC, Evangelopoulos DS, Kontovazenitis P, Nikolopoulos K, Soucacos PN. High energy tibial plateau fractures treated with hybrid external fixation. J Orthop Surg Res 2011;6:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar A, Whittle AP. Treatment of complex (Schatzker Type VI) fractures of the tibial plateau with circular wire external fixation: Retrospective case review. J Orthop Trauma 2000;14:339–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elsøe R, Larsen P, Rasmussen S, Hansen HA, Eriksen CB. High degree of patient satisfaction after percutaneous treatment of lateral tibia plateau fractures. Dan Med J 2016;63:A5174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sament R, Mayanger JC, Tripathy SK, Sen RK. Closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation for tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2012;20:37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mattiassich G, Foltin E, Scheurecker G, Schneiderbauer A, Kröpfl A, Fischmeister M. Radiographic and clinical results after surgically treated tibial plateau fractures at three and twenty two years postsurgery. Int Orthop 2014;38:587–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McNamara IR, Smith TO, Shepherd KL, Clark AB, Nielsen DM, Donell S, et al. Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;9 CD009679.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Honkonen SE. Degenerative arthritis after tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:273–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weigel DP, Marsh JL. High-energy fractures of the tibial plateau. Knee function after longer followup. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84-A:1541–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Duwelius PJ, Connolly JF. Closed reduction of tibial plateau fractures. A comparison of functional and roentgenographic end results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;230 116–26.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Trumble T, Allan CH, Miyano J, Clark JM, Ott S, Jones DE, et al. A preliminary study of joint surface changes after an intraarticular fracture: A sheep model of a tibia fracture with weight bearing after internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rademakers MV, Kerkhoffs GM, Sierevelt IN, Raaymakers EL, Marti RK. Operative treatment of 109 tibial plateau fractures: Five- to 27-year followup results. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:5–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Blokker CP, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Tibial plateau fractures. An analysis of the results of treatment in 60 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;182 193–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bai B, Kummer FJ, Sala DA, Koval KJ, Wolinsky PR. Effect of articular step-off and meniscectomy on joint alignment and contact pressures for fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Houben PF, van der Linden ES, van den Wildenberg FA, Stapert JW. Functional and radiological outcome after intraarticular tibial plateau fractures. Injury 1997;28:459–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spyridon P. Galanakos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kateros, K., Galanakos, S.P., Kyriakopoulos, G. et al. Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures Treated by Hybrid External Fixation System. IJOO 52, 161–169 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_300_16

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_300_16

Keywords

MeSH terms

Navigation