Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Center’s Experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There has been a gradual increase in the revision TKA (RTKA) workload due to expanding indications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), coupled with improving patient longevity. Western countries are already looking at their data on RTKA to plan for the future heath care needs of these patients. Limited data is available on RTKA from developing countries. Our study attempts to fill this gap in knowledge.

Materials and Methods

We prospectively documented details of all RTKA performed at our centre for a period of six years (2011–16). We recorded the volume, causes and time to failure from index surgery of all RTKA and further recorded microbiological pattern in septic failures. We looked at the proportion of each cause of failure and time from index surgery.

Results

Of the 5068 TKA procedures performed from January 2011 to December 2016, 201 (4%) were first-time revisions. The predominant cause of revisions was prosthetic infection (61%) followed by aseptic loosening (18%) and instability (7%). In the early, mid term, and late-failure groups, prosthetic infection remained the main cause of failure. In 47% of the septic revisions, the offending organisms could be identified and of those identified most (67%) were Gram-negative.

Conclusion

The volume of first-time RTKA procedures (4%) at our center remained low compared with that of the Western countries. In Western countries, the incidence of late aseptic failures was higher than that of early-septic failures, whereas in our study, revisions were more commonly performed in the early-failure group (48%) and most failures were due to prosthetic infection (61%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR, et al. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA 2012;308:1227–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hooper G, Lee AJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C. Current trends and projections in the utilisation rates of hip and knee replacement in New Zealand from 2001 to 2026. N Z Med J 2014;127:82–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, Tokarski AT, Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today – Has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty 2014;29:1774–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari M, Smith J, Miller LE, Block JE. Clinical and economic burden of revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 2012;5:89–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Widmer M, Maravic M, Gómez-Barrena E, et al. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. Int Orthop 2011;35:1783–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kurtz SM, Gawel HA, Patel JD. History and systematic review of wear and osteolysis outcomes for first-generation highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2262–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Le DH, Goodman SB, Maloney WJ, Huddleston JI. Current modes of failure in TKA: Infection, instability, and stiffness predominate. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:2197–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Oduwole KO, Molony DC, Walls RJ, Bashir SP, Mulhall KJ. Increasing financial burden of revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:945–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Calliess T, Ettinger M, Hülsmann N, Ostermeier S, Windhagen H. Update on the etiology of revision TKA - Evident trends in a retrospective survey of 1449 cases. Knee 2015;22:174–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty 2013;28:120–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lombardi AV Jr., Berend KR, Adams JB. Why knee replacements fail in 2013: Patient, surgeon, or implant? Bone Joint J 2014;96-B: 101–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schroer WC, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Barnes CL, Bolognesi MP, Berend ME, et al. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. J Arthroplasty 2013;28:116–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hossain F, Patel S, Haddad FS. Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:1221–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kasahara Y, Majima T, Kimura S, Nishiike O, Uchida J. What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:1533–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim KT, Lee S, Ko DO, Seo BS, Jung WS, Chang BK, et al. Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients 55 years of age or younger. Knee Surg Relat Res 2014;26:13–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Koh IJ, Cho WS, Choi NY, Kim TK, Kleos Korea Research Group. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: A multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:316–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Motififard M, Pesteh M, Etemadifar MR, Shirazinejad S. Causes and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: Local results from Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res 2015;4:111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: From the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2992–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Registry, N.J. National Joint Registry 11th Annual Report 2014. The National Joint Registry (NJR) for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man;2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Culliford DJ, Maskell J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Price AJ, Arden NK, et al. Temporal trends in hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom: 1991 to 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:130–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and wales: A comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry Dataset. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B: 1076–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement: Cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93:293–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thiele K, Perka C, Matziolis G, Mayr HO, Sostheim M, Hube R, et al. Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: Polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97:715–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, et al. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Lund, Sweden: 2011. http://www.knee.se. [Last accessed on 2017 Mar 07].

  27. Vergidis P, Patel R. Novel approaches to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of medical device-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2012;26:173–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang X, Wang Q, Wang H, Wang S, Zhong Q, Li Z, et al. Comparison and estimation of different diagnostic methods in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2016;54:251–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fraser JF, Werner S, Jacofsky DJ. Wear and loosening in total knee arthroplasty: A quick review. J Knee Surg 2015;28:139–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel A, Pavlou G, Mújica-Mota RE, Toms AD. The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: A comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry Dataset. Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1076–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barun Datta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulshrestha, V., Datta, B., Mittal, G. et al. Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Center’s Experience. JOIO 53, 282–288 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_127_17

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_127_17

Keywords

Navigation