Abstract
One-dimensional indium chains on Si(111) exhibit both temperature-and defect-induced perioddoubling (×2) structural transitions, and their natures have been focus of recent investigations. Using density functional perturbation theory calculations, we examined the vibrational properties of the room-temperature Si(111)In-4×1 structure. The phonon band structure revealed two unstable modes at the zone-boundary in the chain direction, which lead to a lattice instability towards a structure with parallel trimers. This lattice-instability-driven 4 × 2 structure is different from the low-temperature 4×2 (LT-4×2) structure (hexagon structure). The result suggests that the roomtemperature phase is neither a static 4×1 phase nor the dynamical fluctuation of the LT-4×2 phase. We demonstrate that the room-temperature phase is a dynamically fluctuating parallel-trimer 4×2 phase, and the fluctuations become suppressed near the defects to result in the defect-induced ×2 structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Roth, One dimensional metals (VCH, Weinheim, 1995).
S. Baroni, S. Gironcoli, A. D. Corso and P. Giannozzi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001).
C. Watanabe, S. ChibaS and Y. Ono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 114704 (2007).
J. M. Carpinelli, H. H. Weitering, M. Bartkowiak, R. Stumpf and E. W. Plummer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2859 (1997).
D. Farías, W. Kamiński, J. Lobo, J. Ortega, E. Hulpke, R. Pérez, F. Flores and E. G. Michel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 016103 (2003).
R. Pérez, J. Ortega and F. Flores, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4891 (2001).
O. Bunk, G. Falkenberg, J. H. Zeysing, L. Lottermoser, R. L. Johnson, M. Nielsen, F. Berg-Rasmussen, J. Baker and R. Feidenhans’l, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12228 (1999).
J-H. Cho, D-H. Oh, K. S. Kim and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. B 64, 235302 (2001).
H. W. Yeom, S. Takeda, E. Rotenberg, I. Matsuda, K. Horikoshi, J. Schaefer, C. M. Lee, S. D. Kevan, T. Ohta, T. Nagao and S. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4898 (1999).
C. Kumpf, O. Bunk, J. H. Zeysing, Y. Su, M. Nielsen, R. L. Johnson, R. Feidenhans’l and K. Bechgaard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4916 (2000).
S. J. Park, H. W. Yeom, S. H. Min, D. H. Park and I-W. Lyo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 106402 (2004).
G. Lee, S-Y. Yu, H. Kim and J-Y. Koo, Phys. Rev. B 70, 121304(R) (2004).
G. Lee, S-Y. Yu, D. Lee, H. Kim and J-Y. Koo, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 2087 (2006).
J. Guo, G. Lee and E. W. Plummer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 046102 (2005).
G. Lee, J. Guo and E. W. Plummer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116103 (2005).
J-H. Cho, J-Y. Lee and L. Kleinman, Phys. Rev. B 71, 081310(R) (2005).
C. González, F. Flores and J. Ortega, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 136101 (2006).
A. A. Stekolnikov, K. Seino, F. Bechstedt, S. Wippermann, W. G. Schmidt, A. Calzolari and M. Buongiorno Nardelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 026105 (2007).
C. González, J. Guo, J. Ortega, F. Flores and H. H. Weitering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 115501 (2009).
S. Chandola, K. Hinrichs, M. Gensch, N. Esser, S. Wippermann, W. G. Schmidt, F. Bechstedt, K. Fleischer and J. F. McGilp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 226805 (2009).
J-H. Cho and J-Y. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 76, 033405 (2007).
S. Wipperman and W. G. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 126102 (2010).
http:ўw.abinit.org
N. Troullier and J. L. Martins, Phys. Rev. B 43, 1993 (1991).
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996); 78, 1396(E) (1997).
P. Giannozzi, S. de Gironcoli, P. Pavone and S. Baroni, Phys. Rev. B 43, 7231 (1991).
J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1998 (1983); Phys. Rev. B 31, 805 (1985).
F. Bechstedt, A. Krivosheeva, J. Furthmüller and A. A. Stekolnikov, Phys. Rev. B 68, 193406 (2003).
K. Sakamoto, H. Ashima, H. W. Yeom and W. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 62, 9923 (2000).
K. Fleischer, S. Chandola, N. Esser, W. Richter and J. F. McGilp, Phys. Rev. B 67, 235318 (2003).
K. Fleischer, S. Chandola, N. Esser, W. Richter and J. F. McGilp, Phys. Rev. B 76, 205406 (2007).
W. G. Schmidt, S. Wippermann, S. Sanna, M. Babilon, N. J. Vollmers and U. Gerstmann, Phys. Status Solidi B 249, 343 (2012).
For E cutoff ≤ 20 Ry, the antiparallel trimer 4 × 2 structure is stable, whereas the hexagon 4 × 2 relaxes to the antiparallel trimer in accordance with the other DFT calculations [18,21]. With the increased E cutoff ≥ 32 Ry, however, both the antiparallel trimer and hexagon 4 × 2 structures relax to the parallel-trimer 4 × 2 structure.
The criterion for the stability of structures is the free energy at finite temperature. The phonon entropy contribution to the free energy, however, is expected to be similar for both the parallel-trimer 4 × 2 and 4 × 1 structures, because their atomic geometries are marginally different and they share a metallic electronic structure. Therefore, the total energy difference can be used to determine the stable geometry at finite temperatures above the transition temperature.
H. Shim, S-Y. Yu, W. Lee, J-Y. Koo and G. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 231901 (2009).
G. Lee, S-Y. Yu, H. Kim, J-Y. Koo, H. I. Lee and D. W. Moon, Phys. Rev. B 67, 035327 (2003).
Y. J. Sun, S. Agario, S. Souma, K. Sugawara, Y. Tago, T. Sato and T. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. B 77, 125115 (2008).
H. W. Yeom, K. Horikoshi, H. M. Zhang, K. Ono and R. I. G. Uhrberg, Phys. Rev. B 65, 241307(R) (2002).
K. Hata, S. Yasuda and H. Shigekawa, Phys. Rev. B 60, 8164 (1999).
J. Yoshinobu, Prog. Surf. Sci. 77, 37 (2004).
J-Y. Koo, J-Y. Yi, C. Hwang, D-H. Kim, G. Lee and S. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 57, 8782 (1998).
T. Yokoyama and K. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. B 56, 10483 (1997).
O. N. Chung, H. Kim, S. Chung and J-Y. Koo, Phys. Rev. B 73, 033303 (2006).
S-Y. Yu, H. Kim and J-Y. Koo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 036107 (2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, Y.H., Lee, G. & Kim, H. Room-Temperature Atomic Structure and Lattice Instability of In Nanowires on Si(111). Journal of the Korean Physical Society 72, 372–378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.372
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.72.372