Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(4), 578–602. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200738
Article
Google Scholar
Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words. Memory & Cognition, 29(4), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200465
Article
Google Scholar
Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S.-T., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bates, E., Marchman, V., Thal, D., Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, J. S., Reilly, J., & Hartung, J. (1994). Developmental and stylistic variation in the composition of early vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 85–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008680
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In D. Jurafsky, J. Chai, N. Schluter, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 5185–5198). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463
Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929054021102
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195349
Article
Google Scholar
Bisk, Y., Holtzman, A., Thomason, J., Andreas, J., Bengio, Y., Chai, J., … Turian, J. (2020). Experience grounds language. In B. Webber, T. Cohn, Y. He, & Y. Liu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 8718–8735). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.703
Bock, K., & Griffin, Z. M. (2000). The persistence of structural priming: Transient activation or implicit learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.2.177
Article
Google Scholar
Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as Social Tools: An Embodied View on Abstract Concepts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9539-0
Bojanowski, P., Grave, E., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2017). Enriching word vectors with subword information. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00051
Article
Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Cortese, M. J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.503374
Article
Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., De Deyne, S., Voorspoels, W., & Storms, G. (2014a). Norms of age of acquisition and concreteness for 30,000 Dutch words. Acta Psychologica, 150, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.010
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014b). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Buechel, S., Rücker, S., & Hahn, U. (2020). Learning and Evaluating Emotion Lexicons for 91 Languages. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1202–1217. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.112
Cameirão, M. L., & Vicente, S. G. (2010). Age-of-acquisition norms for a set of 1,749 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.474
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caramelli, N., Setti, A., & Maurizzi, D. D. (2004). Concrete and abstract concepts in school age children. Psychology of Language and Communication, 8(2), 19–34.
Google Scholar
Caselli, M. C., Bates, E., Casadio, P., Fenson, J., Fenson, L., Sanderl, L., & Weir, J. (1995). A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development. Cognitive Development, 10(2), 159–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(95)90008-X
Article
Google Scholar
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
Article
Google Scholar
Ćoso, B., Guasch, M., Ferré, P., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2019). Affective and concreteness norms for 3,022 Croatian words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(9), 2302–2312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819834226
Article
Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. The University of Chicago Press.
Crossley, S., Feng, S., Cai, Z., & McNamara, D. (2013). Chapter 5. Computer Simulations of MRC Psycholinguistic Database Word Properties: Concreteness, Familiarity, and Imageability. In S. Jarvis & M. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary Knowledge: Human Ratings and Automated Measures (pp. 135-156). John Benjamins.
Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time Course of Frequency Effects in Spoken-Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye Movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 317–367. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0750
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. (1989). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 824–845. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.824
Article
Google Scholar
De Groot, A. M. B., & Keijzer, R. (2000). What Is Hard to Learn Is Easy to Forget: The Roles of Word Concreteness, Cognate Status, and Word Frequency in Foreign-Language Vocabulary Learning and Forgetting. Language Learning, 50(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00110
Article
Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 313–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008407066
Article
Google Scholar
Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Vigliocco, G., & Cappa, S. F. (2010). Beyond the abstract—concrete dichotomy: Mode of acquisition, concreteness, imageability, familiarity, age of acquisition, context availability, and abstractness norms for a set of 417 Italian words. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1042–1048. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1042
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dellantonio, S., Mulatti, C., Pastore, L., & Job, R. (2014). Measuring inconsistencies can lead you forward: Imageability and the x-ception theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00708
Desrochers, A., & Thompson, G. L. (2009). Subjective frequency and imageability ratings for 3,600 French nouns. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.546
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957). Papers in Linguistics: 1934-1951. Oxford University Press.
Fliessbach, K., Weis, S., Klaver, P., Elger, C. E., & Weber, B. (2006). The effect of word concreteness on recognition memory. NeuroImage, 32(3), 1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.007
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gardner, M. K., Rothkopf, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory & Cognition, 15(1), 24–28. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197709
Article
Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development. Volume 2: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ghyselinck, M., De Moor, W., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns. Psychologica Belgica, 40(2), 77–98.
Article
Google Scholar
Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Gupta, P., Joulin, A., & Mikolov, T. (2018). Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languages. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, K. Hasida, … T. Tokunaga (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018) (pp. 3483–3487). Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Retrieved from https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1550
Guasch, M., Ferré, P., & Fraga, I. (2016). Spanish norms for affective and lexico-semantic variables for 1,400 words. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1358–1369. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0684-y
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1954). Distributional Structure. WORD, 10(2–3), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520
Article
Google Scholar
Hinojosa, J. A., Moreno, E. M., & Ferré, P. (2020). Affective neurolinguistics: Towards a framework for reconciling language and emotion. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 813–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1620957
Article
Google Scholar
Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Lefsrud, L. (2017). Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1603–1619. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1195417
Article
Google Scholar
Imbir, K. K. (2016). Affective Norms for 4900 Polish Words Reload (ANPW_R): Assessments for Valence, Arousal, Dominance, Origin, Significance, Concreteness, Imageability and, Age of Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01081
Ivanov, V. V., & Brown, W. (2020, May 6). Slavic languages. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Slavic-languages
Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Word and Picture Identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 684–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.684
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Juhasz, B. J., Yap, M. J., Raoul, A., & Kaye, M. (2019). A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000564
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446
Article
Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030859
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kuvač Kraljević, J., & Olujić, M. (2018). Imageability and subjective frequency of the 500 rated nouns in the Croatian Lexical Database. Suvremena lingvistika, 44(85), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2018.085.04
Article
Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Nouns and Verbs. Language, 63(1), 53–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/415384
Article
Google Scholar
Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Lee, C., & Federmeier, K. D. (2008). To watch, to see, and to differ: An event-related potential study of concreteness effects as a function of word class and lexical ambiguity. Brain and Language, 104(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.06.002
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ljubešić, N. (2019). Inflectional lexicon hrLex 1.3, Slovenian language resource repository CLARIN.SI, http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1232.
Ljubešić, N., Fišer, D., & Peti-Stantić, A. (2018). Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words Within and Across Languages via Word Embeddings. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-3028
Ljubešić, N. & Klubička, F. (2016). Croatian web corpus hrWaC 2.1, Slovenian language resource repository CLARIN.SI. http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1064.
Łuniewska, M., Haman, E., Armon-Lotem, S., Etenkowski, B., Southwood, F., Anđelković, D., Blom, E., Boerma, T., Chiat, S., de Abreu, P. E., Gagarina, N., Gavarró, A., Håkansson, G., Hickey, T., de López, K. J., Marinis, T., Popović, M., Thordardottir, E., Blažienė, A., … Ünal-Logacev, Ö. (2016). Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages: Is there a cross-linguistic order of words? Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 1154–1177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1623–1642. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.988735
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Marful, A., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., Barbón, A., & Bajo, T. (2016). Forgetting “Novel” but Not “Dragon”: The Role of Age of Acquisition on Intentional and Incidental Forgetting. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0155110. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155110
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Dell, G. S. (1996). Recovery in Deep Dysphasia: Evidence for a Relation between Auditory–Verbal STM Capacity and Lexical Errors in Repetition. Brain and Language, 52(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0005
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I., Hall, M. L., & Zvaigzne, M. (2014). Subjective frequency ratings for 432 ASL signs. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0370-x
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Moguš, M., Bratanić, M., & Tadić, M. (1999). Hrvatski čestotni rječnik. Zavod za lingvistiku, Školska knjiga.
Montefinese, M., Vinson, D., Vigliocco, G., & Ambrosini, E. (2019). Italian Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Words (ItAoA). Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00278
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Moors, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., Wanmaker, S., van Schie, K., Van Harmelen, A.-L., … Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, dominance, and age of acquisition for 4,300 Dutch words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0243-8
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(3), 528–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/027249897392017
Article
Google Scholar
Navarrete, E., Pastore, M., Valentini, R., & Peressotti, F. (2015). First learned words are not forgotten: Age-of-acquisition effects in the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Memory & Cognition, 43(7), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0525-3
Article
Google Scholar
Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00102-9
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford University Press.
Paivio, A. (2010). Dual coding theory and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 5(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.5.2.04pai
Article
Google Scholar
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1, Pt.2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327
Article
Google Scholar
Pecher, D., Boot, I., & Van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract Concepts. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54, pp. 217–248). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00007-3
Peti-Stantić, A., Anđel, M., Keresteš, G., Ljubešić, N., Stanojević, M.-M., & Tonković, M. (2018). Psycholinguistic estimates of 3000 words of Croatian: Concreteness and imageability. Suvremena lingvistika, 44(85), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.22210/suvlin.2018.085.05
Article
Google Scholar
Peti-Stantić, A., Stanojević, M.-M., Anđel, M., Tonković, M., Keresteš, G., Ljubešić, N., Willer Gold, J., Tušek, J., Masnikosa, I., & Gnjidić, V. (2019). Hrvatska psiholingvistička baza [Data set]. Modeliranje mentalne gramatike hrvatskoga: ograničenja informacijske strukture. https://doi.org/10.17234/megahr.2019.hpb
Plaut, D. C., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(5), 377–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299308253469
Article
Google Scholar
Radanović, J., Westbury, C., & Milin, P. (2016). Quantifying semantic animacy: How much are words alive? Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(6), 1477–1499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000096
Article
Google Scholar
Recchia, G., & Louwerse, M. M. (2015). Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1584–1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.941296
Article
Google Scholar
Reilly, J., & Kean, J. (2007). Formal Distinctiveness of High- and Low-Imageability Nouns: Analyses and Theoretical Implications. Cognitive Science, 31(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336988
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Rofes, A., Zakariás, L., Ceder, K., Lind, M., Johansson, M. B., de Aguiar, V., Bjekić, J., Fyndanis, V., Gavarró, A., Simonsen, H. G., Sacristán, C. H., Kambanaros, M., Kraljević, J. K., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Mavis, İ., Orellana, C. M., Sör, I., Lukács, Á., Tunçer, M., … Howard, D. (2018). Imageability ratings across languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0936-0
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Romani, C., Mcalpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness Effects in Different Tasks: Implications for Models of Short-Term Memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(2), 292–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601147747
Article
Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W.-M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208259
Article
Google Scholar
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82
Article
Google Scholar
Scorolli, C., Binkofski, F., Buccino, G., Nicoletti, R., Riggio, L., & Borghi, A. M. (2011). Abstract and Concrete Sentences, Embodiment, and Languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00227
Simonsen, H. G., Lind, M., Hansen, P., Holm, E., & Mevik, B.-H. (2013). Imageability of Norwegian nouns, verbs and adjectives in a cross-linguistic perspective. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27(6–7), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2012.752527
Article
Google Scholar
Soares, A. P., Costa, A. S., Machado, J., Comesaña, M., & Oliveira, H. M. (2017). The Minho Word Pool: Norms for imageability, concreteness, and subjective frequency for 3,800 Portuguese words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0767-4
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193891
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stoll, S., Bickel, B., Lieven, E., Paudyal, N. P., Banjade, G., Bhatta, T. N., Gaenszle, M., Pettigrew, J., Rai, I. P., Rai, M., & Rai, N. K. (2012). Nouns and verbs in Chintang: Children’s usage and surrounding adult speech. Journal of Child Language, 39(2), 284–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000911000080
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tan, H., & Bansal, M. (2020). Vokenization: Improving language understanding with contextualized, visual-grounded supervision. In B. Webber, T. Cohn, Y. He, & Y. Liu (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 2066–2080). Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.162
Thompson, B., & Lupyan, G. (2018). Automatic estimation of lexical concreteness in 77 languages. In C. Kalish, M. Rau, J. Zhu, & T. T. Rogers (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2018) (pp. 1122–1127). Cognitive Science Society. http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-BEA1-3
Vigliocco, G., Kousta, S.-T., Della Rosa, P. A., Vinson, D. P., Tettamanti, M., Devlin, J. T., & Cappa, S. F. (2014). The Neural Representation of Abstract Words: The Role of Emotion. Cerebral Cortex, 24(7), 1767–1777. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht025
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
Article
Google Scholar
West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, Semantic, and Surface-Level Processing of Concrete and Abstract Words: An Electrophysiological Investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137558
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1988). MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202594
Article
Google Scholar
Yee, L. T. S. (2017). Valence, arousal, familiarity, concreteness, and imageability ratings for 292 two-character Chinese nouns in Cantonese speakers in Hong Kong. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0174569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174569
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Yi, H.-A., Moore, P., & Grossman, M. (2007). Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in patients with semantic dementia. Neuropsychology, 21(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.9
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar