Abstract
In general, animals are known to be sensitive to the immediacy of reinforcers. That is, they are generally impulsive and outcomes that occur in the future are generally heavily discounted. Furthermore, they should prefer alternatives that provide reinforcers that require less rather than greater effort to obtain. In the present research, pigeons were given a choice between (1) obtaining reinforcers on a progressively more difficult schedule of reinforcement; starting with four pecks, then eight pecks, then 16 pecks, then 32 pecks, and finally 64 pecks on each trial, and (2) a color signaling a number of pecks for a single reinforcer: red = six, green = 11, blue = 23, or yellow = 45. If pigeons choose optimally, most of the time they should choose the progressive schedule to obtain five reinforcers rather than switch to a color to receive only one. However, if they are sensitive primarily to the number of pecks to the next reinforcer, they should choose the progressive schedule once before switching to red, twice before switching to green, three times before switching to blue, and four times before switching to yellow. Instead, they systematically switched too early. Rather than choose based on the rate of reinforcement or even based on the time or effort to the next reinforcer, they appear to anticipate that the progressive schedule is going to get more difficult, and they base their choice suboptimally on the serial pattern of the worsening progressive schedule.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076860
Bhatt, R. S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1987). Choice behavior of pigeons on multiple schedules: A test of optimal foraging theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 13, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.13.1.40
Chandel, H., Boring, M., Zentall, T. R., & Wasserman, W. A. (2021). Should I stay or should I go? Implications of a pigeon (Columba livia) foraging task for optimal foraging theory and serial pattern learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 135, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000263
Fountain, S. B., & Rowan, J. D. (1995). Sensitivity to violations of “run” and “trill” structures in rat serial-pattern learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21(1), 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.21.1.78
Garlick, D., Fountain, S. B., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2017). Serial pattern learning in pigeons: Rule-based or associative? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning & Cognition, 43, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000109
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A Discounting Framework for Choice With Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
Hulse, S. H., & Dorsky, N. P. (1977). Structural complexity as a determinant of serial pattern learning. Learning and Motivation, 8, 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(77)90047-9
Kilpatrick, Z. P., Davidson, J. D., El Hady, A. (2020). Normative theory of patch foraging decisions. arxiv.org/abs/2004.10671
Kilpatrick, Z. P., Davidson, J. D., & El Hudy, A (2021). Uncertainty drives deviations in normative foraging decision strategies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18, 20210337.
Laude, J. R., Beckmann, J. S., Daniels, C. W., & Zentall, T. R. (2014). Impulsivity affects gambling-like choice by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 40, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000001
Pattison, K. F., Zentall, T. R., & Watanabe, S. (2012). Sunk cost: Pigeons (Columba livia) too show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023826
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1988.1010086.x
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Data Availability
The data and materials for all experiments are available from the first author at zentall@uky.edu
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zentall, T.R., Peng, D.N. Serial pattern learning: The anticipation of worsening conditions by pigeons. Learn Behav (2024). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-024-00628-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-024-00628-1