Abstract
Response-sequence learning is often studied by manipulating consequences for sequence completion. Results of research evaluating how changes in discriminative stimuli disrupt the accuracy of response sequences suggest that transitions to reversed but highly predictive discriminative stimuli are more disruptive than the removal of discriminative stimuli. Two experiments assessed effects of changing discriminative stimuli on response-sequence accuracy while reinforcement remained contingent on a left-peck, right-peck response sequence. Initially, pigeons were trained on the response sequence in which the S+ key was illuminated red and the S- key was illuminated white. For all conditions of both experiments, the “accurate” response sequence that led to food was the same, but the way the accurate sequence was signaled sometimes differed. In Experiment 1, after training, discriminative stimuli were either removed (by lighting both keys white) or reversed. Accuracy was lower when discriminative stimuli were reversed than when they were removed. Experiment 2 showed that after training with discriminative stimuli, a history of reinforcement without discriminative stimuli was sufficient for the response sequence to emerge at high levels of accuracy when the discriminative stimuli were reversed. Results suggest a parsimonious explanation for why highly predictive discriminative stimuli sometimes fail to control behavior based on behavioral history.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachá-Méndez, G., Reid, A. K., & Mendoza-Soylovna, A. (2007). Resurgence of integrated behavioral units. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 5–24.
Brown-Su, A. M., Matzel, L. D., Gordon, E. L., & Miller, R. R. (1986). Malleability of conditioned associations: path dependence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 12, 420–427.
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.
Fox, A. E., & Kyonka, E. G. E. (2013). Pigeon responding on fixed-interval and response-initiated fixed-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 100, 187–197.
Gluck, M. A., Mercado, E., & Myers, C. E. (2008). Learning and memory: From brain to behavior. New York: Worth.
Hearst, E. (1991). Psychology and nothing. American Scientist, 79, 432–443.
Hommel, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward an empirical clarification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 764–775.
Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136, 189–202.
Jenkins, H. M., & Sainsbury, R. S. (1969). The development of stimulus control through differential reinforcement. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 123–161). Halifax: Dalhousie University Press.
Jenkins, H. M., & Sainsbury, R. S. (1970). Discrimination learning with the distinctive feature on positive or negative trials. In D. Mostofsky (Ed.), Attention: Contemporary theory and analysis (pp. 239–273). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kiernan, D., Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2012). Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19, 914–920.
Kyonka, E. G. E., & Grace, R. C. (2007). Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 33, 392–408.
Kyonka, E. G. E., & Grace, R. C. (2008). Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains when alternatives differ on multiple dimension of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 49–69.
Lattal, K. A. (1975). Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 241–246.
Lotz, A., Uengoer, M., Koenig, S., Pearce, J. M., & Lachnit, H. (2012). An exploration of the feature-positive effect in adult humans. Learning & Behavior, 40, 222–230.
Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 17, 363–386.
Nallan, G. B., Miller, J. S., McCoy, D. F., Taylor, R. T., & Serwatka, J. (1984). Transfer effects in feature-positive and feature-negative learning by pigeons. American Journal of Psychology, 97, 509–518.
Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Reed, P., Schachtman, T. R., & Hall, G. (1991). Effect of signaled reinforcement on the formation of behavioral units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 147–162.
Reid, A. K., Chadwick, C. Z., Dunham, M., & Miller, A. (2001). The development of functional response units: the role of demarcating stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 303–320.
Reid, A. K., Nill, C. A., & Getz, B. R. (2010). Changes in stimulus control during guided skill learning in rats. Behavioural Processes, 84, 511–515.
Reid, A. K., Rapport, H. F., & Le, T. (2013). Why don’t guiding cues always guide in behavior chains? Learning & Behavior, 41, 402–413.
Reid, A.K., Folks, N., & Hardy, J. (2014). On the dynamics of stimulus control during guided skill learning in nonhumans. Behavioural Processes. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.017.
Sainsbury, R. S. (1973). Discrimination learning utilizing positive or negative cues. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 27, 46–57.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
Schneider, S. M., & Davison, M. (2005). Demarcated response sequences and the generalized matching law. Behavioural Processes, 70, 51–61.
Schneider, S. M., & Morris, E. K. (1992). Sequences of spaced responses: behavioral units and the role of contiguity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 537–555.
Shimp, C. P. (1981). The local organization of behavior: discrimination of and memory for simple behavior patterns. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 303–315.
Shimp, C. P. (1982). On metaknowledge in the pigeon: an organism’s knowledge about its own behavior. Animal Learning and Behavior, 10, 358–364.
Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.
Urcuioli, P. J., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). A Simon effect in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 93–107.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Nathan Rice for assistance in computer programming.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fox, A.E., Reid, A.K. & Kyonka, E.G.E. Behavioral History and Pigeons’ “Guiding Cues” Performance. Psychol Rec 64, 403–413 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0060-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0060-9