Abstract
To identify variables that underlie intuitive judgments about the sizes of groups of similar objects, we asked people to judge the relative heights of vertical bars briefly shown, two groups at a time, on a computer display. Randomly selected normal deviates determined individual bar height. Average differences in height and group sizes were also randomly varied. Twenty-eight participants judged 250 differences each, which were then submitted to multiple regression analysis and psychophysical inspection. The total number of bars sharpened discrimination, whereas variance dulled it. Critical ratio (CR), the forerunner to the modern t test, emerged as the most important predictor; little additional variance was explained by other factors. The difference in the number of bars was a reliable factor, favoring the greater number of bars. Confidence limits around thresholds, defined as CRs needed to say “possibly greater,” surrounded 1.65; as a z value, this corresponded to a one-tailed probability of .05. Judgments about noisy stimuli thus seem to be based on a statistical process and to employ a probability criterion similar to that used in the formal statistical evaluation of experimental findings—namely, p<.05.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12, 157–162.
Bauer, B. (2006, June). Which mean do we mean? Rapid extraction of summary values from visual displays. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, & Cognitive Science, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Campbell, K. A., Evans, G. & Gallistel, C. R. (1985). A microcomputer-based method for physiologically interpretable measurement of the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation. Physiology & Behavior, 35, 395–403.
Chong, S. C. & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43, 393–404.
Chong, S. C. & Treisman, A. (2005a). Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1–13.
Chong, S. C. & Treisman, A. (2005b). Statistical processing: Computing the average size in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 45, 891–900.
Gescheider, G. A. (1997). Psychophysics: The fundamentals (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lathrop, R. G. (1966). First-order response dependencies at a differential brightness threshold. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 120–124.
Lathrop, R. G. (1967). Perceived variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 498–502.
Legge, G. E., Gu, Y. & Luebker, A. (1989). Efficiency of graphical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 365–374.
Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G. & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Obrecht, N. A., Chapman, G. B. & Gelman, R. (2007). Intuitive t tests: Lay use of statistical information. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1147–1152.
Rosenholtz, R. (2000). Significantly different textures: A computational model of pre-attentive texture segmentation. In D. Vernon (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 197–211). Berlin: Springer.
Rucci, A. J. & Tweney, R. D. (1980). Analysis of variance and the “second discipline” of scientific psychology: A historical account. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 166–184.
Sedlmeier, P. & Gigerenzer, G. (1997). Intuitions about sample size: The empirical law of large numbers. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 33–51.
Sorkin, R. D., Mabry, T. R., Weldon, M. S. & Elvers, G. (1991). Integration of information from multiple element displays. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 49, 167–187.
Spencer, J. (1961). Estimating averages. Ergonomics, 4, 317–328.
Spencer, J. (1963). A further study of estimating averages. Ergonomics, 6, 255–265.
“Student” [Gosset, W. S.] (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6, 1–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fouriezos, G., Rubenfeld, S. & Capstick, G. Visual statistical decisions. Perception & Psychophysics 70, 456–464 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.456
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PP.70.3.456