Abstract
In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bülthoff, H. H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a 2-D view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 89, 60–64.
Cleveland, W. S. (1979). Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 829–836.
Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302–307.
Edelman, S. (1999). Representation and recognition in vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385–2400.
Edelman, S., Bülthoff, H. H., & Bülthoff, I. (1999). Effects of parametric manipulation of inter-stimulus similarity on 3D object categorization. Spatial Vision, 12, 107–123.
Friedman, A., Spetch, M. L., & Ferrey, A. (2005). Recognition by humans and pigeons of novel views of 3-D objects and their photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 149–162.
Friedman, A., & Waller, D. (2008). View combination in scene recognition. Memory & Cognition, 36, 467–478.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.
Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.
Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 162–170.
Palmer, S., Rosch, E., & Chase, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135–151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Palmeri, T. J., & Flanery, M. A. (1999). Learning about categories in the absence of training: Profound amnesia and the relationship between perceptual categorization and recognition memory. Psychological Science, 10, 526–530.
Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (2001). Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 274–310.
Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233–282.
Ullman, S. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition, 67, 21–44.
Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2007). A high-distortion enhancement effect in the prototype-learning paradigm: Dramatic effects of category learning during test. Memory & Cognition, 35, 2088–2096.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of the research were supported by a grant to A.F. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Work by E.H. on this project was supported by a gift from Ted Smith to Miami University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, D., Friedman, A., Hodgson, E. et al. Learning scenes from multiple views: Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views. Memory & Cognition 37, 90–99 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.1.90
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.1.90