Abstract
We examined the use of lexeme meaning during the processing of spatially unified bilexemic compound words by manipulating both the location and the word frequency of the lexeme that primarily defined the meaning of a compound (i.e., the dominant lexeme). The semantically dominant and nondominant lexemes occupied either the beginning or the ending compound word location, and the beginning and ending lexemes could be either high- or low-frequency words. Three tasks were used—lexical decision, naming, and sentence reading—all of which focused on the effects of lexeme frequency as a function of lexeme dominance. The results revealed a larger word frequency effect for the dominant lexeme in all three tasks. Eye movements during sentence reading further revealed larger word frequency effects for the dominant lexeme via several oculomotor motor measures, including the duration of the first fixation on a compound word. These findings favor theoretical conceptions in which the use of lexeme meaning is an integral part of the compound recognition process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S., Miller, B., & Rayner, K. (2004). Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16, 285–311.
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 94–117.
Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89–106.
Bertram, R., & Hyönä, J. (2003). The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 615–634.
Coolen, R., van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1991). The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds. Memory & Cognition, 19, 341–352.
Coolen, R., van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Schreuder, R. (1993). Processing novel compounds: Evidence for interactive meaning activation of ambiguous nouns. Memory & Cognition, 21, 235–246.
Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 87–107.
Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1612–1627.
Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory & Cognition, 24, 466–476.
Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 42, 23–50.
Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439.
Inhoff, A. W., & Topolski, R. (1994). Seeing morphemes: Loss of visibility during the retinal stabilization of compound and pseudocompound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 840–853.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G. (1999). Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain & Language, 68, 362–369.
Juhasz, B. J. (2007). The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 373–389). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 291–316.
Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223–244.
Laudanna, A., Badecker, W., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Priming homographic stems. Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 531–546.
Libben, G., Derwing, B. L., & de Almeida, R. G. (1999). Ambiguous novel compounds and models of morphological parsing. Brain & Language, 68, 378–386.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain & Language, 84, 50–64.
Lima, S. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 310–332.
Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä, J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20, 261–290.
Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 820–833.
Pollatsek, A., Rayner, K., & Balota, D. A. (1986). Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 123–130.
Prinzmetal, W. (1990). Neon colors illuminate reading units. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 584–597.
Prinzmetal, W., Hoffman, H., & Vest, K. (1991). Automatic processes in word perception: An analysis from illusory conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 902–923.
Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734–747.
Rayner, K., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency. Psychology Bulletin & Review, 3, 245–248.
Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 1188–1200.
Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529–567.
Shillcock, R. (1990). Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 24–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 83–124). Orlando: Academic Press.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 15, 607–620.
van Jaarsveld, H. J., & Rattink, G. E. (1988). Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17, 447–473.
Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 341–368.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research on this project was supported by NIH Grant HD043405.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Inhoff, A.W., Starr, M.S., Solomon, M. et al. Eye movements during the reading of compound words and the influence of lexeme meaning. Memory & Cognition 36, 675–687 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.675
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.3.675