Abstract
Maze learning efficiency was measured under verbal and motor learning modes and single and double maze conditions to investigate additivity of response produced cues. The results indicated that an additivity of response produced cues assumption would not accountfor superiority of verbal mode maze learners.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Espfr, F. A. Language. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social. psychology. Worcester: Clark University Press, 1935. Pp. 417–460.
Husband, R. W. Human learning on a four section, elevated finger maze. J. gen. Psychol., 1928, 1, 15–28.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stellwagen, W.T., Card, G.W. Human learning in multiple T maze: An investigation of verbal and motor learning modes. Psychon Sci 2, 227–228 (1965). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03343419
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03343419