Abstract
An experiment was performed to test the hypothesis, derived from equity theory, that equity and unfavorable inequity can act as a source of reward and punishment in addition to any reward provided by an individuals own outcomes. The results supported the hypothesis. It was also found that the choice behavior of females was more strongly influenced by equity and inequity than was that of males.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ADAMS, J. S. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1963, 67, 422–436.
ADAMS, J. S. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1965. Pp. 267–299.
GALLO, P. S., JR., & McCLINTOCK, C. G. Cooperative and competitive behavior in mixed-motive games. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1965, 9, 68–78.
HOMANS, C. G. Social behavior: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1961.
MESSICK, D. M., & McCLINTOCK, C. G. Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1968, 4, 1–25.
MESSICK, D. M., & THORNGATE, W. B. Relative gain maximization in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1967, 3, 85–101.
RADINSKY, T. L. Relative loss avoidance in the triple dominance game. Psychology, in press.
RAPOPORT, A., & CHAMMAH, A. Sex differences in factors contributing to the level of cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1965, 2, 831–838.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radinsky, T.L. Equity and inequity as a source of reward and punishment. Psychon Sci 15, 293–295 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336306
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336306