Abstract
Two different kinds of serial position curves are produced by immediate serial recall of supraspan lists. One is the regular bow-shaped curve, generally regarded as the standard shape. The other is a curve in which recall decreases from the first to about the third serial position, levels off at the fourth position, and then decreases more sharply at the fifth serial position. In many studies, this marked pattern suggests a discontinuity in the serial position curve. This article reviews studies producing each kind of curve, presents some analyses suggesting that a chunking process is involved in the production of the second kind of curve, and discusses the significance of the problem for studies of serial recall and order information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ayres, T. J., Jonides, J., Reitman, J. S., Egan, J. C, & Howard, D. A. Differing suffix effects for the same physical suffix. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 315–321.
Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. Group structure, coding, and memory for digit series. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph, 1969, 80(2, Pt. 2).
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. Input modality and the serial posi tion curve in short-term memory. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10, 135–136.
Craik, F. I. M., & Levy, B. A. The concept of primary memory. In W. K. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1976.
Crowder, R. G. Waiting for the stimulus suffix: Decay, delay, rhythm, and readout in immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 23, 324–340.
Elmes, D. G. Isolation of items and the stimulus suffix effect. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 345–348.
Hinrichs, J. V. Prestimulus and poststimulus cuing of recall order in the memory span. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 12, 261–262.
Jahnke, J. C. Serial position effects in immediate serial recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963, 2, 284–287.
Jensen, A. R. Individual differences in visual and auditory memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 62, 123–131.
Johnson, N.G. The role of chunking and organization in the process of recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Lyon, D. R. Individual differences in immediate serial recall: A matter of mnemonics? Cognitive Psychology, 1977, 9, 403–411.
Madigan, S. Modality and recall order interactions in short-term memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychol ogy, 1971, 87, 294–296.
McGeoch, J. The psychology of human learning. New York: Longmans, Green, 1942.
Morton, J. A functional model for memory. InD. A. Norman (Ed.), Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Morton, J. Two mechanisms in the stimulus suffix effect. Memory & Cognition, 1976, 4, 144–149.
Morton, J., & Chambers, S. M. Some evidence for ‘speech’ as a distinctive feature. British Journal of Psychology, 1976, 67, 31–45.
Morton, J., Crowder, R. G., & Prussin, H. A. Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. Journal of Experimental psy chology Monograph, 1971, 91, 169–190
Murdock, B. B., Jr. Auditory and visual stores in short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 1967, 27, 316–324.
Murdoch, B. B., Jr. Serial order effects in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1968, 76(4, Pt. 2).
Murdoch, B.B. Jr. Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, N. J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Murdoch, B. B. Jr., & Carey, S. T. Release from interference in single-trial free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 398–402.
Penney, C. G. Suffix effects in lists of temporally grouped words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978, 30, 235–250.
Penney, C. G. Interactions of suffix effects with suffix delay and recall modality in serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 507-521.
Routh, D. A. An “across-the-board” modality effect in immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976, 28, 285–304.
Routh, D. A., & Frosdick, R. M. The basis and implications of the restoration of a recency effect in immediate serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978, 30, 201–220.
Salter, D. Maintaining recency despite a stimulus suffix. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975, 27, 433–442.
Salter, D., & Colley, J. G. The stimulus suffix: A paradoxical effect. Memory & Cognition, 1977, 5, 257–262.
Salter, D., & Osler, J. Residual effects in recall after a stimu lus suffix. British Journal of Psychology, 1978, 69, 91–100.
Spoehr, K. T., & Corin, W. J. The stimulus suffix effect as a memory coding phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 583–589.
Watkins, M. J., & Todres, A. K. Stimulus suffix effect and the item-position distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human learning and Memory, 1979, 5, 322–325.
Wickelgren, W. A. Rehearsal grouping and hierarchical organi zation of serial position cues in short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967, 19, 97–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madigan, S. The serial position curve in immediate serial recall. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 335–338 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334550
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334550