Abstract
Three groups of 200 Ss each, a total of 600 Ss, were given lists of words to categorize as belonging to specific concepts. Group 1 had no anchoring words in their list; Group 2 had 10 anchoring words not pertinent to the category in question; and Group 3 had 10 anchoring words pertinent to the category in question. Analyses of variance showed significant differences between groups. It is suggested that irrelevant words may operate in two ways, as a generalized “strength of concept” and as “content” anchors.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. Concept span as a composite function of personal values, anxiety and rigidity. Journal of Personality, 1955, 24, 20–33.
MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. Shifts in connotative meaning of words as a function of previous restrictive experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 55, 200–205.
MAYZNER, M. S., & TRESSELT, M. E. Shifts in connotative meaning of words as a function of varying amounts of previous restrictive experience. Journal of Psychology, 1959, 47, 107–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tresselt, M.E. The effect of partially irrelevant anchors on verbal conceptual thinking. Psychon Sci 16, 312–313 (1969). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332707
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332707