Abstract
Rats were trained initially to barpress for food when either a tone or a light was presented. One group then had the tone-food (St-S*) association extinguished by presentation of the tone in the absence of the bar followed by no food. Under this condition, the response-food (R-S*) association was assumed to remain intact. Another group had the R-S* but not the tone-food (St-S*) association extinguished by presentation of the light when a barpress did not produce a food pellet. Two control groups, one concerned with generalized extinction and the other receiving no treatment, were included. The persistence of responding to the tone was then measured in extinction. Extinguishing either type of association (St-S* or R-S*) reduced resistance to extinction relative to controls, implicating both types of association as being important in determining the persistence of operant behavior, with the suggestion that the R-S* may be more important than the StS*. These results are inconsistent with the current trend of emphasizing the importance of St-S* associations to the exclusion of other associative mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A. Partial reinforcement effects on vigor and persistence. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Bindra, D. A. A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification. Psychological Review, 1974, 81, 199–213.
Bindra, D. How adaptive behavior is produced: A perceptual-motivational alternative to response-reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1978,1, 41–91.
Brown, P. L., & Jenkins, H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon’s key peck. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 1–8.
Capaldi, E. J. A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Jenkins, H. M. Sensitivity of different response systems to stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relations. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian interactions. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Hearst, E., & Jenkins, H. M. Sign tracking: The stimulus-reinforcer relation and directed action. Austin, Tex: Psycho-nomic Society, 1974.
Moore, B. R. The role of directed Pavlovian reactions in simple instrumental learning in the pigeon. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.), Constraints on learning. London: Academic Press, 1973.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mellgren, R.L., Olson, M.W. Associative processes controlling the persistence of operant responding: S-S* and R-S*. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 16, 279–282 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329543
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329543