Abstract
Underwood (1972) has hypothesized that natural language mediation may be an epiphenomenon, overloading our conception of human memory. This study examines the specific proposition that natural language mediator (NLM) dropout during learning indicates that they become “useless” and that they are weakened or are replaced by more direct associations. Subjects learned CVC-adjective pairs with the aid of NLMs in a study-test paradigm. After subjects reported that the NLM was no longer needed for response recall (“useless”), they received either 0 or 15 additional study-test sequences of the item. On a later retention test, significant differences were found favoring the 15 additional trials condition for both response and NLM retention. It appears that NLMs do not disappear with disuse, but that they can be long-lasting products of acquisition, potentially serving useful memorial functions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams, J. A., & Bray, N. W. A closed-loop theory of paired-associate verbal learning. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 385–405.
Adams, J. A., Marshall, P. H., & Bray, N. W. Closed-loop theory and long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 90, 242–250.
Adams, J. A., & McIntyre, J. S. Natural language mediation and all-or-none learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1967, 21, 436–449.
Marshall, P. H., & Smith, R. A. S. Verification processes in recognition memory: The role of natural language mediators. British Journal of Psychology, in press.
Underwood, B. J. Are we overloading memory? In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D. C: V. H. Winston, 1972
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Michael T. Jones and Mark Hannifin in the collection of the data.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marshall, P.H., Smith, R.A.S. What happens to “useless” natural language mediators?. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 10, 207–208 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329325
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329325