Abstract
In Phase 1, alleyway run speeds of amygdalectomized rats given large (12 pellets) or small (2 pellets) magnitude of reward were initially faster for the large-magnitude group, with the small-magnitude group catching up (termed the collapse effect) early in training. The collapse effect for nonlesion groups given similar magnitudes of reward occurred also, but much later in training. In Phase 2, all animals were given the same number of pellets as in Phase 1 with the addition of a 60-sec goalbox delay of reinforcement. In the lesion animals, the brief increase in performance, due to such a shift, occurred later in training than it did for the non-lesion animals. Following the brief increase there was a large decrement in responding for all groups, but the performance decrement of the lesion groups combined was less than it was for the nonlesion groups combined. Thus, rats with amygdala lesions were less responsive to original, and to changes in, contingencies of reinforcement relative to control animals. The normal function of the amygdala is briefly discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A., & Roussel, J. Motivational properties of frustration: I. Effect on a running response of the addition of frustration to the motivational complex. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952, 43, 363–368.
Campbell, P. E., Batsche, C. J., & Batsche, G. M. Spaced-trials reward magnitude effects in the rat: Single versus multiple food pellets. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972, 81, 360–364.
Goomas, D. T., Hamm, C., & Skinner, J. Runway performance of amygdalectomized rats: Magnitude of reinforcement and delay of food reward. Physiological Psychology, 1980, 8, 97–100.
Henke, P. G. Amygdalectomy and mixed reinforcement schedule contrast effect. Psychonomic Science, 1972, 28, 301–302.
Henke, P. G. Effects of reinforcement omission on rats with lesions in the amygdala. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973, 84, 187–193.
Henke, P. G. Dissociation of the frustration effect and the partial reinforcement extinction effect after limbic lesions in the rat. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1977, 91, 1032–1038.
Henke, P. G., Allen, J. D., & Davison, C. Effect of lesions in the amygdala on behavioral contrast. Physiology & Behavior, 1972, 8, 173–176.
Henke, P. G., & Maxwell, D. Lesions in the amygdala and the frustration effect. Physiology & Behavior, 1973, 10, 647–650.
Kemble, E. D., & Beckman, G. J. Runway performance of rats following amygdaloid lesions. Physiology & Behavior, 1970, 5, 45–47.
Künig, F. R., & Klippel, R. A. The rat brain: A stereotaxic atlas of the forebrain and lower parts of the brain stem. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins, 1963.
McCain, G., Dyleski, D., & McElvain, G. Reward magnitude and instrumental responses: Consistent reward. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1971, 3(16, Whole No. 48), 249–256.
McHose, J. H., & Moore, J. N. Reinforcer magnitude and instrumental performance in the rat. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1976, 8, 416–418.
Norton, P. R. E. Differences in the electrophysiological correlates upon receipt of a food reward and non-reward in the rat. Brain Research, 1970, 24, 134–138.
Reynolds, G. S. Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 57–71.
Reynolds, G. S. A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, Ill: Scott, Foresman, 1975.
Richardson, J. S. The amygdala: Historical and functional analysis. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 1973, 33, 623–648.
Spence, K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, Conn: 0Yale University Press, 1956.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors would like to thank Donna M. Allgood for assistance provided in multiple ways. The electronic circuitry was constructed by Jack Moore.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goomas, D.T., Steele, M.K. The collapse effect and delay of reinforcement with amygdalectomized rats. Psychobiology 8, 463–466 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326476
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03326476