Abstract
The semantic interference effect observed in Stroop tasks and picture-word interference tasks might be due to the previous confounding of semantic similarity with task relevance (in the Stroop task) and with perceptual similarity (in the picture-word interference task). A picture-word variant of the Stroop task was devised in which the factors of task relevance and perceptual similarity were controlled. The distractor conditions allowed for the examination of four types of context effects. The results show that the overall Stroop-like interference effect can be decomposed into interference effects due to (1) a semantic relation between distractor and target, (2) the semantic relevance of the distractor word in the task at hand, (3) the presence of the distractor word in the response set, and (4) the mere presence of a word. Implications of these findings for the locus or loci of Stroop and picture-word interference effects are discussed. It is concluded that distractor words in Stroop-like naming tasks interfere mainly in the process of name retrieval.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bakan, P., &Alperson, B. (1967). Pronounceabilily, attensity, and interference in the color-word test.American Journal of Psychology,80, 416–420.
Bowles, N. L., &Poon, L. W. (1985). Effects of priming in word retneval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 272–283.
Brown, A. S. (1979). Priming effects in semantic memory retrieval processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 65–77.
Brown, R., &Mcneill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 325–337.
Carr, T. H., Mccauley, C., Sperber, R. D., &Parmelee, C. M. (1982). Words, pictures, and priming: On semantic activation, conscious identification, and the automaticity of information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 757–776.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.
Dallas, M., &Merlkle, P. M. (1976). Semantic processing of non-attended visual information.Canadian Journal of Psychology,30, 15–21.
Dalrymple-Alford, E. C., &Azkoul, J. (1972). The locus of interference in the Stroop and related tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 385–388.
De Vries, K. L. M. (1986). Vertrouwdheid van woorden en woord-herkenning [Familiarity of words and word recognition].Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden,41, 295–304.
Egeth, H. E., Blecker, D. L., &Kamlet, A. S. (1969). Verbal interference in a perceptual comparison task.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 355–356.
Ellis.A. W. (1985). The production of spoken words: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.),Progress in the psychology of language (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the idennfication of a target letter In a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M G. H., Morris, L. R., &O’hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response compentionBulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 165–168
Flowers, J. H. (1980). Response priming effects m a digit naming task as a function of target-noise separation.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,16, 443–446
Flowers, J. H., &Dutch, S. (1976). The use of visual and name codes in scanning and classifying colors.Memory & Cognition,4, 384–390
Flowers, J. H., &Stoup, C. M. (1977) Selective attention between words and colors In speeded classification and vocahztion tasks.Memory & Cognition,5, 299–307
Flowers, J. H., &Wilcox, N. (1982). The effect of flanking context on visual classification: The joint contnbution of interactions at different processing levels.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 581–591
Fox, L. A., Shor, R. E., &Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and Interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 59–65.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Percepuon & Performance,8, 875–894
Glaser, W. R., &Dungelhoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,10, 640–654.
Glazenborg, G., &Schreuder, R. (1983) Software tools for creating line drawings on a CRT.Behavioral Research, Methods & In-strumentauon,15, 453–455.
Goodman, G. S., Haith, M. M., Guttentag, R. E., &Rao, S. (1985). Automatic processing of word meaning: Intralingual and interlingual interference.Child Development,56, 103–118
Gruneberg, M. M., &Monks, J. (1974). “Feeling of knowing” and cued recall.Acta Psychoiogica,38, 257–265.
Guttentag, R. E., &Haith, M. M. (1978). Automatic processing as a function of age and reading ability.Child Development,49, 707–716.
Hines, D., Czerwinski, M., Sawyer, P. K., &Dwyer, M. (1986). Automatic semantic pnming: Effect of category exemplar level and word association level.Journal of Expenmental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 370–379.
Jones, G. V., &Langford, S. (1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue stateCognition,26, 115–122.
Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
La Heij, W., Van Der Heijden, A. H. C., &Schreuder, R. (1985) Semantic pnrrung and Stroop-like Interference In word-naming tasksJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 62–80.
La Heij, W., &Vermeij, M. (1987). Reading versus naming The effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation.Percepuon & Psychophysics,41, 355–367
Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task.Memory & Cognition,7, 485–495.
Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 349–367.
Lupker, S. J., &Katz, A. N. (1981). Input, decision, and response factors in picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 269–282.
Mcclain, L. (1983). Effects of response type and set size on Stroop color-word performance.Perceptual & Motor Skills,56, 735–743.
Neumann, O. (1980).Informationsselektion und Handlungssteuerung [Selection of Information and control of action]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bochum, Federal Republic of Germany.
Neumann, O. (1986).Facilitative and inhibitory effects of “semantic relatedness” (Report No. 111/1986). Bielefeld, Federal Republic of Germany: University of Bielefeld, Research Group on “Perception and Action.”
Neumann, O., &Kautz, L. (1982).Semanasche Förderung und semantische Interferenz im Benennungsexperiment [Semantic facrhtauon and semantic interference In a naming experiment] (Bencht Nr 23/1982) Bochum, Federal Republic of Germany: University of Bochum
Palef, S. R. (1978) Judging pictorial and hnguistic aspects of spaceMemory & Cognition,6, 70–75
Palef, S. R., &Olson, D. R. (1975) Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 201–209
Palmer, S. E. (1975) The effects of contextual scenes on the idenufi-cation of objects.Memory & Cognition,3, 519–526
Posnansky, C. J., &Rayner, K. (1977). Visual-feature and response components In a picture-word Interference task with beginning and skilled readers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,24, 440–460
Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word Interference In the Stroop color-naming task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 413–419
Rayner, K., &Posnansky, C. (1978) Stages of processing In word rdennfication.Journal of Expenmental Psychology General,107, 64–80
Rayner, K., &Springer, C. J. (1986). Graphemic and semantic sirrular-rty effects In the picture-word interference task.British Journal of Psychology,77, 207–222
Regan, J. (1978). Involuntary automatic processing in color-naming tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 130–136.
Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semanticallybasedChild Development,48, 643–647
Rosinski, R. R., Gounkoff, R. M., &Kukish, K. S. (1975). Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task.Child Development,46, 247–253
Seymour, P. H. K. (1977). Conceptual encoding and locus of the Stroop effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 245–265.
Singer, M. H., Lappin, J. S., &Moore, L. P. (1975). The interference of vanous word parts on color naming in the Stroop test.Per-cepuon & Psychophysics,18, 191–193.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of Interference in senal verbal reactionsJournal of Expenmental Psychology,18, 643–661.
Uleman, J. S., &Reeves, J. (1971). A reversal of the Stroop interference effect, through scanning.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 293–295.
Underwood, G. (1976). Semantic interference from unattended printed words.British Journal of Psychology,67, 327–338.
Van Loon-Vervoorn, W. A. (1985).Voorstelbaarheulswaarden van Nederlandse woorden [Imageability values of Dutch words] Lrsse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop Interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319
Warren, R. E. (1972). Stimulus encoding and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,94, 90–100.
Warren, R. E. (1974). Association, directionality and stimulus encodingJournal of Experimental Psychology,102, 151–158.
Warren, R. E. (1977) Time and the spread of activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 458–466.
Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., Flude, B. M., Mcweeny, K. H., &Hay, D. C. (1986). Face-name interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 466–475.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
La Heij, W. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming. Memory & Cognition 16, 400–410 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214220
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214220