Abstract
Previous research has found that subjects listening to a communication can be persuaded more when they receive false physiological feedback concerning their emotional state than when such feedback is not presented. Such results, in conjunction with Bem’s (1972) postulate that subjects infer their attitude from the external circumstances of their behavior, suggested that false feedback of belief or disbelief would affect persuasion. Subjects listened to a speech while observing their (false) reactions on a “belief meter.” Half of the subjects received strong positive belief feedback, and the other half received strong disbelief feedback. Demand characteristics were varied by telling half of the subjects in each group that the meter was highly reliable and valid and the other half that is was of questionable validity. Results showed that the meter feedback affected self-attributions of attitude. Subjects receiving disbelief feedback rated their attitude the same as a control group who merely completed the attitude scale. Subjects receiving belief feedback were persuaded more than a control group receiving only the communication. The implications of the data for the construct of attitude were discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bem, D. J. Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Bem, D. J., &McConnell, H. K. Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970,14, 23–31.
Giesen, M., &Hendrick, C. Effects of false positive and negative arousal feedback on persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,30, 449–457.
Harris, V. A., &Jellison, J. M. Fear-arousing communications, false physiological feedback, and the acceptance of recommendations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971.7, 269–279.
Hendrick, C., Giesen, M., &Borden, R. False physiological feedback and persuasion: Effect of fear arousal vs. fear reduction on attitude change.Journal of Personality, 1975,43, 196–214.
Hendrick, C., Seyfried, B. Assessing the validity of laboratory-produced attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974,29, 865–870.
Jones, E. E., Sigall, H. The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude.Psychological Bulletin, 1971,76, 349–364.
Leventhal, H. Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 5. New York. Academic Press, 1970.
Ross, M., Insko, C. A., &Ross, H. S. Sell-attribution of attitude.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1971,17, 292–297.
Schachter, S., &Singer, J. E. Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 379–399
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. Neg York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 20388-01 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hendrick, C., Giesen, M. Self-attribution of attitude as a function of belief feedback. Memory & Cognition 4, 150–155 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213157
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213157