Abstract
Pigeons were exposed to a two-component multiple fixed-ratio X fixed-ratio Y schedule of reinforcement in which X was always less than Y. Components were equal in duration and alternated at rates that varied between 2 sec and 23.5 h. Relative response rate in the FR X component: (1) increased as the duration of components increased between 2 sec and 15 min, (2) was at a maximum between 15 min and 6 h, and (3) decreased as the duration of components increased from 6 h to 23.5 h. The changes in relative response rate were attributable primarily to changes in absolute response rates during the FR Y schedule as absolute response rates during the FR X schedule were relatively invariant. These results pose complexities for several theoretical formulations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Catania, A. C. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973,19, 517–526.
Collier, G. H., Hirsch, E., &Hamlin, P. H. The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat.Physiology & Behavior, 1972,9, 705–716.
Collier, G., Hirsch, E., &Kanarek, R. The operant revisited. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Crossman, E. K. Pause relationships in multiple and chained fixed-ratio schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 117–126.
Crossman, E. K. The effects of fixed-ratio size in multiple and mixed fixed-ratio schedules.Psychological Record, 1971,21, 535–544.
de Villiers, P. A. Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Edmon, E. L. Multiple schedule component duration: A reanalysis of Shimp and Wheatley (1971) and Todorov (1972).Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,30, 239–241.
Fantino, E., &Logan, C. A. The experimental analysis of behavior: A biological perspective. San Francisco: Freeman, 1979.
Fantino, E., &Navarick, D. Recent developments in choice. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
Ferster, C. B., &Skinner, B. F. Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
Findley, J. D. An experimental outline for building and exploring multi-operant behavior repertoires.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1962,5, 113–166.
Herrnstein, R. J. On the law of effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 243–266.
Herrnstein, R. J. Derivatives of matching.Psychological Review, 1979,86, 486–495.
Hursh, S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1980,34, 219–238.
Lander, D. G., &Irwin, R. J. Multiple schedules: Effects of the distribution of reinforcements between components on the distribution of responses between components.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 517–524.
Navarick, D. J., &Fantino, E. Stochastic transitivity and unidimensional behavior theories.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 426–441.
Navarick, D. J., &Fantino, E. Stochastic transitivity and the unidimensional control of choice.Learning and Motivation, 1975,6, 179–201.
Nevin, J. A., &Shettleworth, S. J. An analysis of contrast effects in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 305–315.
Norboro, J. Component duration and response rates on multiple ratio schedules. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego, 1974.
Rachlin, H. Contrast and matching.Psychological Review, 1973,80, 214–234.
Reynolds, G. S. Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1963,6, 131–139.
Schuster, C. Response latencies as a measure of the interaction of components on a multiple fixed-ratio schedule.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1959,2, 259. (Abstract)
Shimp, C. P. Optimal behavior in free-operant experiments.Psychological Review, 1969,76, 97–112.
Shimp, C. P. Probabilistic discrimination learning in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,97, 292–304.
Shimp, C. P., &Wheatley, K. L. Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with short component durations.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 205–210.
Silberbero, A., &Schrot, J. A. Yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: The relationship between component duration and discrimination.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 21–30.
Spealman, R. D., &Gollub, L. R. Behavioral interactions in multiple variable interval schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 471–481.
Todorov, J. C. Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1972,17, 45–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant 20752 to the University of California, San Diego.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norborg, J., Osborne, S. & Fantino, E. Duration of components and response rates on multiple fixed-ratio schedules. Animal Learning & Behavior 11, 51–59 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212306
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212306