Abstract
A three-phase investigation of the effects of duration and number of inescapable shocks with rats was conducted. In the first phase (shock treatment), separate groups were exposed either to 64 or 128 5-sec shocks or to 32, 64, or 128 10-sec shocks. Measures of intrashock activity were found to be lower for the groups exposed to 64 or 128 10-sec shocks than for any other group. In the second phase (Test Day 1), half of each group was tested for interference with FR 1, locomotor escape-avoidance learning at either 24 or 168 h following cessation of shock treatment, using a control procedure that was designed to equate groups for exposure to test shock. The results indicated that, relative to nonshock-treated controls, at each interval only the groups previously given 64 or 128 10-sec shocks were impaired in terms of escape frequency. However, all groups given at least 64 shocks exhibited depressed intertrial responding at the 24-h, but not the 168-h, interval. In the final phase (Test Days 2–4), the control procedure for equalizing test-shock exposure was discontinued and a pattern of interference effects was observed in terms of escape-avoidance response latency that was identical to that reported for the escape frequency in Phase 2. In general, these data were viewed as indicating that duration, but not total amount of shock, was a critical determinant of behavior during inescapable shock and of the subsequent interference effect. Both effects of duration were regarded as the product of a common associative process involving the learning of immobility tendencies to shock that served to compete with later escape-avoidance responding.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, D. C., Crowell, C. R., Cunningham, C. L., &Lupo, J. V. Behavior during shock exposure as a determinant of subsequent interference with shuttle box escape-avoidance learning in the rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1979,5, 243–257.
Anisman, H., DeCatanzaro, D., &Remington, G. Escape performance following exposure to inescapable shock: Deficits in motor response maintenance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 197–218.
Bracewell, R. J., &Black, A. H. The effects of restraint and noncontingent preshock on subsequent escape learning in the rat.Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 53–69.
Campbell, B. A., &Teghtsoonian, R. Electrical and behavioral effects of different types of shock stimuli on the rat.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1958,51, 185–192.
Crowell, C. R., Lupo, J. V., Cunningham, C. L., &Anderson, D. C. Temporal form of shock is a determinant of magnitude of interference with escape-avoidance learning produced by exposure to inescapable shock.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1978,12, 407–410.
Glazer, H. I., &Weiss, J. M. Long-term and transitory interference effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1976,2, 191–201.
Lawry, J. A., Lupo, V., Overmier, J. J., Kochevar, J., Hollis, K. L., &Anderson, D. C. Interference with avoidance behavior as a function of qualitative properties of inescapable shocks.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1978,6, 147–154.
Lykken, D. T., &Rose, R. A rat-holder with electrodes for GSR measurement.American Journal of Psychology, 1959,72, 621–622.
Maier, S. F., Albin, R. W., &Testa, T. J. Failure to learn to escape in rats previously exposed to inescapable shock depends on nature of escape response.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1973,85, 581–592.
Maier, S. F., &Seligman, M. E. P. Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976,105, 3–46.
Overmier, J. B., &Seligman, M. E. P. Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1967,63, 28–33.
Seligman, M. E. P., Maier, S. F., &Solomon, R. L. Unpredictable and uncontrollable aversive events. In F. R. Brush (Ed.),Aversive conditioning and learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crowell, C.R., Anderson, D.C. Influence of duration and number of inescapable shocks on intrashock activity and subsequent interference effects. Animal Learning & Behavior 9, 28–37 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212022
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212022