Skip to main content
Log in

Behavior of Rats with High and Low Levels of Freezing in Defensive Situations and on Selection of Food Reinforcement

  • Published:
Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Behavior in rats with different levels of freezing in a classical defensive conditioned reflex was compared on acquisition of conditioned passive and active avoidance reflexes and on selection of food reinforcement of different values. Rats with prolonged freezing acquired the passive avoidance reflex better and retained it longer during extinction than animals with shorter freezing. At the same time, the active avoidance reflex in the shuttle box was acquired more easily by animals with short periods of freezing. Rats with prolonged freezing preferred a delayed and more valuable reinforcement in the model of choosing food reinforcements of different values (low level of impulsivity), while animals with short freezing preferred the low-value reinforcement without a delay (high level of impulsivity). The thresholds of pain sensitivity were no different in rats of the different groups. Thus, rats with prolonged freezing demonstrated a passive behavioral strategy in defensive situations and a low level of impulsivity, while rats with short freezing used an active behavioral strategy and showed a high level of impulsivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. I. Vaido, I. V. Zhdanova, and N. V. Shiryaeva, “The emotional resonance reaction in rats with different levels of nervous system arousal,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 37, No. 3, 575–577 (1987).

  2. D. A. Zhukov, The Psychogenetics of Stress. Behavioral and Endocrine Correlates of Genetic Determinants of Stress Reactivity in an Uncontrollable Situation, SPbTsNTI, St. Petersburg (1997).

  3. D. A. Zhukov and E. P. Vinogradova, “Pain sensitivity thresholds in rats genetically selected for the rate of acquisition of active avoidance,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 1, 167–169 (1997).

  4. M. I. Zaichenko, G. Kh. Merzhanova, and A. V. Demina, “Studies of the behavior of ‘impulsive’ and ‘self-controlled’ animal using the ‘emotional resonance’ method,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 60, No. 2, 192–200 (2010).

  5. M. I. Zaichenko, G. L. Vanetsian, and G. Kh. Merzhanova, “Differences in the behavior of impulsive and self-controlled rats in studies in the open field and light-dark box tests,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 61, No. 3, 340–350 (2011).

  6. M. I. Zaichenko, A. V. Sharkova, G. A. Grigor’yan, and G. Kh. Merzhanova, “Signal memory in high impulsive rats in an eight-arm radial maze is better than in low impulsive animals,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 66, No. 5, 600–610 (2016).

  7. A. A. Levandovskaya, M. I. Zaichenko, G. Kh, Merzhanova, and S. V. Salozhin, “Assessment of exploratory activity and anxiety in rats with differences in the extent of impulsive behavior,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 63, No. 6, 719–729 (2013).

  8. L. M. Livanova, I. P. Levshina, L. V. Nozdracheva, et al., “Prophylactic influence of negatively charged air ions in acute stress in rats with different typological behavioral features,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 46, No. 3, 564–570 (1996).

  9. I. V. Pavlova and M. P. Rysakova, “Signs of anxiety in Wistar rats on acquisition of conditioned reflex fear,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 6, 719–735 (2015).

  10. I. V. Pavlova and M. P. Rysakova, “The influences of administration of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor ligands into the amygdala on the behavior of rats with different signs of conditioned reflex fear,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 66, No. 6, 710–724 (2016).

  11. I. V. Pavlova, M. P. Rysakova, and M. I. Sergeeva, “Effects of blockade of D1 and D2 receptors in the basolateral amygdala on the behavior of rats with high and low levels of anxiety and fear,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 4, 471–485 (2015).

  12. M. Yu. Stepanichev, A. O. Tishkina, M. R. Novikova, et al., “Effects of chronic combined stress: changes in the behavior of rats with different reactions to novelty,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 66, No. 5, 611– 625 (2016).

  13. N. V. Shiryaeva, A. I. Vaido, E. S. Petrov, et al., “Behavior of rats with different levels of nervous system arousal in an open fi eld,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 37, No. 6, 1064–1069 (1987).

  14. X. L. An, X. G. Zheng, J. Liang, and Y. J. Bai, “Corticosterone combined with intramedial prefrontal cortex infusion of SCH 23390 impairs the strong fear response in high-fear-reactivity rats,” Psychol. J., 2, No. 1, 1-10 (2013).

  15. D. C. Blanchard and R. J. Blanchard, “Ethoexperimental approaches to the biology of emotion,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., 39, 43–68 (1988).

  16. A. Borta and R. K. Schwarting, “Inhibitory avoidance, pain reactivity, and plus-maze behavior in Wistar rats with high versus low rearing activity,” Physiol. Behav., 84, No. 3, 387–396 (2005).

  17. D. E. Bush, F. Sotres-Bayon, and J. E. LeDoux, “Individual differences in fear: isolating fear reactivity and fear recovery phenotypes,” J. Trauma Stress, 20, No. 4, 413–422 (2007).

  18. J. Coyner, J. L. McGuire, C. C. Parker, et al., “Mice selectively bred for High and Low fear behavior show differences in the number of pMAPK (p44/42 ERK) expressing neurons in lateral amygdale following Pavlovian fear conditioning,” Neurobiol. Learn. Mem, 112, 195–203 (2014).

  19. V. Deroche, P. V. Piazza, M. Le Moal, and H. Simon, “Individual differences in the psychomotor effects of morphine are predicted by reactivity to novelty and influenced by corticosterone secretion,” Brain Res., 623, No. 2, 341–344 (1993).

  20. S. Diaz-Moran, M. Palencia, C. Mont-Cardona, et al., “Coping style and stress hormone responses in genetically heterogeneous rats: comparison with the Roman rat strains,” Behav. Brain Res., 228, No. 1, 203–210 (2012).

  21. A. Gozzi, A. Jain, A. Giovannelli, et al., “A neural switch for active and passive fear,” Neuron, 67, No. 4, 656–666 (2010).

  22. J. A. Gray, The Psychology of Fear and Stress, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1987).

  23. J. M. Koolhaas, “Coping style and immunity in animals: making sense of individual variation,” Brain Behav. Immun., 22, No. 5, 662–667 (2008).

  24. J. Koolhaas, S. F. de Boer, B. Buwalda, and K. van Reenen, “Individual variation in coping with stress: a multidimensional approach of ultimate and proximate mechanisms,” Brain Behav. Evol., 70, No. 4, 218–226 (2007).

  25. J. E. Ledoux, A. Sakaguchi, and D. J. Reis, “Strain differences in fear between spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats,” Brain Res., 277, No. 1, 137–143 (1983).

  26. M. Lehner, E. Taracha, A. Skorzewska, et al., “Behavioral, immunocytochemical and biochemical studies in rats differing in their sensitivity to pain,” Behav. Brain Res., 171, No. 2, 189–198 (2006).

  27. M. Lehner, A. Wislowska-Stanek, P. Maciejak, et al., “The relationship between pain sensitivity and conditioned fear response in rats,” Acta Neurobiol. Exp., 70, No. 1, 56–66 (2010).

  28. L. M. Rorick, P. R. Finn, and J. E. Steinmetz, “Heart rate reactivity an HAD and LAD rats during Pavlovian fear conditioning,” Integr. Physiol. Behav. Sci., 39, No. 1, 24–41 (2004).

  29. K. P. Satinder and K. D. Hill, “Effects of genotype and postnatal experience on activity, avoidance shock threshold, and open-field behavior of rats,” J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 86, 363–374 (1974).

  30. R. Shuhama, C. V. Del-Ben, S. R. Loureiro, and F. G. Graeff, “Animal defense strategies and anxiety disorders,” An. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 79, No. 1, 97–109 (2007).

  31. A. Skorzewska, M. Lehner, A. Wislowska-Stanek, et al., “Midazolam treatment before re-exposure to contextual fear reduces freezing behavior and amygdale activity differentially in high-and low-anxiety rats,” Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 129, 34–44 (2015).

  32. O. Stiedl, J. Radulovic, R. Lohmann, et al., “Strain and substrain differences in context-and tone-dependent fear conditioning of inbred mice,” Behav. Brain Res., 104, No. 1–2, 1–12 (1999).

  33. K. Szklarczyk, M. Korostynski, S. Golda, et al., “Endogenous opioids regulate glucocorticoid-dependent stress-coping strategies in mice,” Neuroscience, 330, 121–137 (2016).

  34. A. A. Zozulya, M. V. Gabaeva, O. Y. Sokolov, et al., “Personality, coping style, and constitutional neuroimmunology,” J. Immunotoxicol., 5, No. 2, 221–225 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Pavlova.

Additional information

Translated from Rossiiskii Fiziologicheskii Zhurnal imeni I. M. Sechenova, Vol. 104, No. 7, pp. 780–796, July, 2018

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pavlova, I.V., Rysakova, M.P., Zaichenko, M.I. et al. Behavior of Rats with High and Low Levels of Freezing in Defensive Situations and on Selection of Food Reinforcement. Neurosci Behav Physi 50, 126–136 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00878-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-019-00878-x

Keywords

Navigation