Abstract
Haptic identification of real objects is superior to that of raised two-dimensional (2-D) depictions. Three explanations of real-object superiority were investigated: contribution of material information, contribution of 3-D shape and size, and greater potential for integration across the fingers. In Experiment 1, subjects, while wearing gloves that gently attenuated material information, haptically identified real objects that provided reduced cues to compliance, mass, and part motion. The gloves permitted exploration with free hand movement, a single outstretched finger, or five outstretched fingers. Performance decreased over these three conditions but was superior to identification of pictures of the same objects in all cases, indicating the contribution of 3-D structure and integration across the fingers. Picture performance was also better with five fingers than with one. In Experiment 2, the subjects wore open-fingered gloves, which provided them with material information. Consequently, the effect of type of exploration was substantially reduced but not eliminated. Material compensates somewhat for limited access to object structure but is not the primary basis for haptic object identification.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, J. (1935). Über taktilrnotorische Figurwahrnehmung.Psychologische Forschungen,20, 102–158.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Biederman, I., &Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition.Cognitive Psychology,20, 38–64.
Chan, T.-C, Carello, C, &Turvey, M. T. (1990). Perceiving object width by grasping.Ecological Psychology,2, 1–35.
Craig, J. C. (1985). Attending to two fingers: Two hands are better than one.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 496–511.
Dacen, D., &Coulson, M. (1988). Tactile mobility maps#x2014;A comparative study. In A. F. Tatham & A. G. Dodds (Eds.),Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for Visually Handicapped People (pp. 7–23). Nottingham: University of Nottingham Press.
Heller, M. A. (1989). Picture and pattern perception in the sighted and the blind: The advantage of the late blind.Perception,18, 379–389.
Ikeda, M., &Uchikawa, K. (1978). Integrating time for visual pattern perception and a comparison with the tactile mode.Vision Research,18, 1565–1571.
Katz, D. (1989).The world of touch (L. E. Krueger, Ed. and Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kennedy, J. M.,&Fox, N. (1977). Pictures to see and pictures to touch. In D. Perkins & B. Leondar (Eds.),The arts and cognition (pp. 118–135). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Klatzky, R. L., Lederman, S. J., &Metzger, V. A. (1985). Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system”.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 299–302.
Lappin, J. S., &Foulke, E. (1973). Expanding the tactual field of view.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 237–241.
Lederman, S. J., &Klatzky, R. L. (1990). Haptic classification of common objects: Knowledge-driven exploration.Cognitive Psychology,22, 421–459.
Lederman, S. J., Klatzky, R. L., Chataway, C, &Summers, C. D. (1990). Visual mediation and the haptic recognition of two-dimensional pictures of common objects.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 54–64.
Loomis, J., Klatzky, R. L.,&Lederman, S. J. (1991). Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.Perception,20, 167–177.
Loomis, J., &Lederman, S. (1986). Tactual perception. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of human perception and performance (pp. 1–41). New York: Wiley.
Magee, L. E., &Kennedy, J. M. (1980). Exploring pictures factually.Nature,278, 287–288.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C, Gray, W., Johnson, D., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Tversky, B., &Hemenway, K. (1984). Objects, parts, and categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 169–193.
Yamane, K. (1935). Tactile pattern perceptions ]in Japanese],Japanese Journal of Psychology,10, 327–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klatzky, R.L., Loomis, J.M., Lederman, S.J. et al. Haptic identification of objects and their depictions. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 170–178 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211752
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211752