Abstract
Attention/likelihood theory has been used to explain the mirror effect in recognition memory. The theory also predicts that any manipulation that affects the recognition of old items will also affect recognition of the new items—more specifically, that all the underlying distributions will move and that they will move symmetrically on the decision axis. In five experiments, we tested this prediction. The first two experiments used encoding tasks during study to change recognition performance for high- and low-frequency words. The results show symmetrical dispersion of the underlying distributions. The final three experiments used repetition to increase recognition performance. Repetition produced a symmetrical pattern of movement that was different from that produced by encoding task. This pattern is, however, also covered by attention/likelihood theory. A further extension of the theory was used to predict response times.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brent, R. P. (1973).Algorithms for minimization without derivatives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Craik, F. I. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Forbach, G. B., Stanners, R. F., &Hochhaus, L. (1974). Repetition and practice effects in a lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition,2, 337–339.
Gegenfurtner, K. R. (1992). PRAXIS: Brent’s algorithm for function minimization.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,24, 560–564.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., &Iverson, G. (1991). Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Concentering of underlying distributions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 81–93.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Glanzer, M., &Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 21–31.
Gorman, A. M. (1961). Recognition memory for nouns as a function of abstractness and frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 23–29.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Kim, K., &Glanzer, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 638–652.
Kim, K., &Glanzer, M. (1995). Intralist interference in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1096–1107.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence RI: Brown University Press.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).
Piéron, H. (1914). Recherches sur les lois de variation des temps de latence sensorielle en fonction des intensités excitatrices [Research on the laws of variation in sensory latency as a function of excitatory intensities].L’Année Psychologique,20, 17–96.
Piéron, H. (1920). Nouvelles recherches sur l’analyse du temps de latence sensorielle et sur la loi qui relie ce temps a l’intensité de l’excitation [New research on the analysis of sensory latency and on the law that relates this time to the intensity of excititation].L’Année Psychologique,22, 58–142.
Runquist, W. N. (1983). Some effects of remembering on forgetting.Memory & Cognition,11, 641–650.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.
Schneider, W. (1988). Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 206–217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research reported here was conducted in partial fulfillment of the doctoral degree by Andrew Hilford. It was supported by National Science Foundation Grant SBR-9409560.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hilford, A., Glanzer, M. & Kim, K. Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion. Memory & Cognition 25, 593–605 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211302
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211302