Abstract
We report two experiments on the influence of head tilt on mental rotation. In Experiment I, subjects decided whether dot patterns were or were not repeated about a line. Their reaction times (RTs) were consistent with the interpretation that they mentally rotated the patterns so that the line was subjectively vertical before making their decisions. When the subjects tilted their heads, the RT functions shifted in the direction of the tilt, indicating that the subjective vertical lay closer to the retinal than to the gravitational vertical. In Experiment II, subjects decided whether singly presented alphanumeric characters in various orientations were standard or backward (mirror-reversed). Again, analysis of their RTs suggested mental rotation to the standard upright, but the function was unaffected by head tilt; in this case, the subjects operated in subjective gravitational rather than retinal coordinates. The choice of retinal or gravitational coordinates may depend on whether the stimuli are interpreted egocentrically or as part of the external world.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Attneave, F., &Olson, R. Discriminability of stimuli varying in physical and retinal orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,74, 149–157.
Attneave, F., &Reid, K. Voluntary control of frame of reference and shape equivalence under head rotation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,78, 153–159.
Cooper, L. A. Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 20–43.
Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Ed.),Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Cooper, L. A., &Shepard, R. N. Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,104, 48–56.
Corballis, M. C.. &Roldan, C. E. On the perception of symmetrical and repeated patterns.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 136–142.
Corballis, M. C., &Roldan, C. E. Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1, 221–230.
Greenhouse, S. W., &Geisser, S. On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika, 1959,24, 95–112.
Julesz, B.Foundations of cyclopean perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.
Mach, E.Analysis of the sensations. Chicago: Open Court Publishing House, 1897.
Miller, E. F. Counterrolling of the human eyes produced by head tilt with respect to gravity.Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 1962,54, 479–501.
Rock, I.Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
Shepard, R. N., &Metzler, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science, 1971,171, 701–703.
Vaughan, G. M., &Corballis, M. C. Beyond tests of significance: Estimating strength of effects in selected ANOVA designs.Psychological Bulletin, 1969,72, 204–213.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the Defence Research Board of Canada (No. 9425-10) and from the National Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corballis, M.C., Zbrodoff, J. & Roldan, C.E. What’s up in mental rotation?. Perception & Psychophysics 19, 525–530 (1976). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211221
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211221