Abstract
Previous research has shown that stimulation of the central visual field with radial flow patterns (produced by forward motion) can induce perceived self-motion, but has failed to demon-strate effects on postural stability of either radial flow patterns or lamellar flow patterns (produced by horizontal translation) in the central visual field. The present study examined the effects of lamellar and radial flow on postural stability when stimulation was restricted to the central visual field. Displays simulating observer motion through a volume of randomly positioned points were observed binocularly through a window that limited the field of view to 15°. The velocity of each display varied according to the sum of four sine functions of prime frequencies. Changes in posture were used to measure changes in perceived spatial orientation. A frequency analysis of postural sway indicated that increased sway occurred at the frequencies of motion simulated in the display for both lamellar and radial flow. These results suggest that both radial and lamellar optic flow are effective for determining spatial orientation when stimulation is limited to the central visual field.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andersen, G. J. (1986). Perception of self-motion: Psychophysical and computational approaches.Psychological Bulletin,99, 52–65.
Andersen, G. J., &Braunstein, M. L. (1985). Induced self-motion m central vision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 122–132.
Bertenthal, B. I., & Bai, D. L. (1987, November).Infants postural compensations induced by central versus peripheral optical flow. Paper presented at the 28th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Seattle.
Brandt, T., Dichgans, J., &Koenig, E. (1973). Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception.Experimental Brain Research,16, 476–491.
Greenhouse, S., &Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika,24, 95–112.
Held, R., Dichgans, J., &Bauer, J. (1975). Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation.Vision Research,15, 357–365.
Johnson, C. A., &Leibowitz, H. W. (1974). Practice, refractive error, and feedback as factors influencing peripheral motion thresholds.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 276–280.
Johnson, C. A., &Scobey, R. P. (1980). Foveal and peripheral displacement thresholds as a function of stimulus luminance, line length, and duration of movement.Vision Research,20, 709–715.
Lee, D., &Aronson, E. (1974). Visual proprioceptive control of standing in human infants.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 529–532.
Lee, D., &Lishman, J. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance.Journal of Human Movement Studies,1, 87–95.
Lestienne, F., Soechting, J., &Berthoz, A. (1977). Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes.Experimental Brain Research,28, 363–384.
Post, R. P., &Chaderjian, M. (1988). Circular vection is independent of retinal eccentricity.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science,29(Suppl.), 447.
Stoffregen, T. A. (1985). Flow structure versus retinal location in the optical control of stance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 554–565.
Winter, D. A. (1979).Biomechanics of Human Movement. New York: Wiley.
Yoneda, S., &Tokumasu, K. (1986). Frequency analysis of body sway in the upright posture.Acta Otolaryngologica,102, 87–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant BNS 8607217.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andersen, G.J., Dyre, B.P. Spatial orientation from optic flow in the central visual field. Perception & Psychophysics 45, 453–458 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210719
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210719