Abstract
Because the sensory response to mechanical and other stimuli cannot increase indefinitely, the power law of sensory perception can be valid only within a limited range of stimulus magnitudes. An alternative two-parameter mathematical expression that can describe, at least in principle, psychophysical relationships at any stimulus range is presented. It is shown mathematically, and demonstrated through computer simulation, that unless the stimulus magnitude is too close to the threshold or saturation level, the resulting relationship in logarithmic coordinates is practically identical to that predicted by the power law model. It is also demonstrated that the absolute magnitude of the alternative model’s constants can be very similar to those found for the power law model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Falmagne, J. C. (1985).Elements of psychophysical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gescheider, G. A. (1985).Psychophysics: Method, theory and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Harper, R., &Stevens, S. S. (1964). Subjective hardness of compliant materials.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 204–215.
Loewenstein, W. R. (1971).Principles of receptor physiology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Marks, L. E. (1974).Sensory processes — The new psychophysics. New York: Academic Press.
Moskowitz, H. R. (1977). Correlating sensory and instrumental measures in food texture.Cereal Food World,22, 232–237.
Moskowitz, H. R., Segars, R. A., Kapsaus, J. G., &Kwter, R. A. (1974). Sensory ratio scales relating hardness and crunchiness 10 mechanical properties of space cubes.Journal of Food Science.39, 200–202.
Norwich, K. H. (1972). The tactile discrimination of complex systems.International Journal of Systems Science,2, 225–228.
Peleg, M. (1980a). A note on the sensitivity of fingers, tongue and jaws as mechanical testing instruments.Journal of Texture Studies,10, 245–251.
Peleg, M. (1980b). Theoretical analysis of the relationship between mechanical hardness and its sensory assessment,Journal of Food Science,45, 1156–1160.
Peleg, M. (1983a). The semantic of theology and texture.Food Technology,37, 54–61.
Peleg, M. (1983b). Some theoretical characteristics of the mechanical signals in sensory evaluation of texture.Journal of Food Science,48, 1187–1191.
Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On thestatus of “direct” psychophysical measurement.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,24, 21–57.
Stevens, S. S. (1975).Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was part of a project supported by the Biochemical and Biomass Engineering Program of tile National Science Foundation (Grant CBT 8702877).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peleg, M., Campanella, O.H. On the mathematical form of psychophysical relationships, with special focus on the perception of mechanical properties of solid objects. Perception & Psychophysics 44, 451–455 (1988). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210430
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210430