Abstract
In two separate experiments, 40 Ss were presented with recorded sentences during each of which a click occurred. Ss had to depress a key as soon as they heard the click. RTs were f aster when the click was located at the major syntactic break of the sentence compared with RTs to clicks not at a break. This confirmed the hypothesis that processing load is a function of the surface structure of sentences, although the role of minor breaks was not clear. A second finding was that RTs were slower when the click was in the first rather than in the second half of the sentence. This can also be explained in terms of differential processing loads.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
FODOR, J. A., & BEVER, T. G. The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1965, 4, 414–420.
GARRETT, M., BEVER, T. G., & FODOR, J. A. The active use of grammar in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1966, 1, 30–32.
MARKS, L. E. Some structural and sequential factors in the processing of sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1967, 6,707–713.
WINER, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
WOODWORTH, R. S., & SCHLOSBERG H.Experimental psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: Holt, 1955.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was carried out by the first author, as a PhD student at the University of Melbourne, under the supervision of the second author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holmes, V.M., Forster, K.I. Detection of extraneous signals during sentence recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 7, 297–301 (1970). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210171
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210171