Abstract
Rats were trained on a daily partial reward schedule of small magnitude of reward (S), nonreward (N), and large magnitude of reward (L), which began with SN or SSNN for all animals. The remainder of the daily schedule was defined by the factorial combination of the number of rewards (1 vs. 3) and the magnitude of reward (S vs. L). Following 18 days of such training, 20 trials of extinction were administered. It was found that increasing the number of rewarded trials in a partial reinforcement schedule decreased resistance to extinction. Furthermore, increased number of large-magnitude rewards reduced resistance to extinction to a greater extent than increased number of small-magnitude rewards.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amsel, A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations.Psychological Bulletin, 1958,55, 102–119.
Bacon, W. E. Partial-reinforcement extinction effect following different amounts of training.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 998–1003.
Campbell, P. E., Crumbaugh, C. M. Rhodus, D. M., &Knouse, S. B. Magnitude of partial reward and amount of training in the rat: An hypothesis of sequential effects.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,75, 120–128.
Capaldi, E. J. Effect of N-length, number of different N-lengths, and number of reinforcements on resistance to extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 230–239.
Capaldi, E. J. Partial reinforcement: A hypothesis of sequential effects.Psychological Review, 1966,73, 459–477.
Capaldi, E. J. A sequential hypothesis of instrumental learning. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Capaldi, E. J. Partial reward either following or preceding consistent reward: A case of reinforcement level.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 954–962.
Capaldi, E. J. Reinforcement level: An expectancy approach to relative reinforcement and nonreinforcement effects. In G. McCain & J. Baerwaldt (Eds.),The Arlington Symposium on Learning. Stamford, Conn: Greylock, in press.
Capaldi, E. J., &Freese, M. R. Partial reward training level and reward magnitude: Effects on acquisition and extinction.Learning and Motivation, 1974,5, 299–310.
Capaldi, E. J., &Kassover, K. Sequence, number of nonrewards, anticipation, and intertriai interval in extinction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 479–482.
Capaldi, E. J., &Stanley, L. R. Percentage of reward vs. N-length in the runway.Psychonomic Science, 1965,3, 263–264.
Haggbloom, S. J., &Williams, D. T. Increased resistance to extinction following partial reinforcement: A function of N-length or percentage of reinforcement?Psychonomic Science, 1971,24, 16–18.
Hill, W. F., &Spear, N. E. Resistance to extinction as a joint function of reward magnitude and the spacing of extinction trials.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 636–639.
Koteskey, R. L. The effect of unreinforced-reinforced sequences on resistance to extinction following partial reinforcement.Psychonomic Science, 1969,14, 36.
McCain, G., Lee, P., &Powell, N. Extinction as a function of partial reinforcement and overtraining.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1962,55, 1004–1006.
Spence, K. W. Behavior theory and learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1960.
Sutherland, N. S., Mackintosh, N. J., &Wolf, J. B. Extinction as a function of the order of partial and consistent reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1965,69, 56–59.
Sutherland, N. S., &Mackintosh, N. J. Mechanisms of animal discrimination learning. New York: Academic Press, 1971.
Theios, J. The partial reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 1–6.
Traupman, K. L., Amsel, A., &Wong, P. T. P. Persistance early and late in extinction as a function of number of continuous reinforcements preceding partial reinforcement training.Animal Learning & Behavior, 1973,1, 219–222.
Uhl, C. N., &Young, A. G. Resistance to extinction as a function of incentive, percentage of reinforcement, and number of nonreinforced trials.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1967,73, 556–564.
Wagner, A. R. Overtraining and frustration.Psychological Reports, 1963,13, 717–718.
Weinstock, S. Resistance to extinction of a running response following partial reinforcement under widely spaced trials.Comparative Journal of Physiological Psychology, 1954,47, 318–322.
Weinstock, S. Acquisition and extinction of a partially reinforced running response at a 24-hour intertriai interval.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958,56, 151–158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by National Institute of Child Health and Development Grant SK HD 04379-03 to E. J. Capaldi.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morris, M.D., Capaldi, E.J. Extinction responding following partial reinforcement: The effects of number of rewarded trials and magnitude of reward. Animal Learning & Behavior 7, 509–513 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209711
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209711