Abstract
The degree of compatibility between defensive responding and leverpress topography was investigated. Rats were trained to leverpress on a Sidman avoidance schedule for one 60-min session. Measures of defensive responding (jumping and rearing) were recorded during initial training. Shock intensity (.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mA) and S-S interval (1, 3, and 5 sec) were varied in Experiment 1. S-S interval had no effect on defensive responding or on performance. Rate of jumping was an increasing function of intensity only at lower intensities. Both jumping and rearing were significantly correlated with leverpressing. Shock intensity (1.0 and 2.0 mA) and lever position (3.02 and 16.83 cm) were varied in Experiment 2. Response rate was an increasing function of intensity at the high lever position but not at the low position. Correlations between rearing and leverpressing, and between jumping and leverpressing, were not significant for either lever position. Bolles’ (1970) theory of species-specific defense reactions was invoked to account for initial facilitated performance.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 32–48.
Bolles, R. C., &Popp, R. J., Jr. Parameters affecting the acquisition of Sidman avoidance.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1964,7, 318–321.
Cahoon, D. D., &Caosav, R. M. A technique for the automatic shaping of escape and avoidance behavior in the operant conditioning chamber.Psychological Record, 1969,19, 431–432.
D’Amato, M. R., Etkin, M., &Fazzaro, J. Effects of shock type and intensity on anticipatory responses.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1968,66, 527–529.
D’Amato, M. R., Fazzaro, J., &Eazzaro, M. Anticipatory responding and avoidance discrimination as factors in avoidance conditioning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968,77, 41–47.
Kimble, G. A. Shock intensity and avoidance learning.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1955,48, 281–284.
Leaf, R. C. Acquisition of Sidman avoidance responding as a function of S-S interval.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1965,59, 298–300.
Riess, D. Shuttleboxes, Skinner boxes, and Sidman avoidance in rats: Acquisition and terminal performance as a function of response topography.Psychonomic Science, 1971,25, 283–286.
Riess, D., &Farrar, C. H. Shock intensity, shock duration, Sidman avoidance acquisition, and the “all or nothing” principle in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1972,81, 347–355.
Swords, G. C. Some factors that influence acquisition of free-operant avoidance behavior.Psychological Reports, 1966,18, 383–396.
Trabasso, T. R., &Thompson, R. W. Shock intensity and unconditioned responding in a shuttlebox.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 215–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feldt, R.C., McCann, L.I. Defensive responding and leverpress topography compatibility: Effects of shock intensity, S-S interval, and lever position. Animal Learning & Behavior 5, 78–82 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209135
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209135