Abstract
Thirty Ss heard and serially recalled 36 different nine-digit series. The recall cue was a buzzer, the wordzero read in the same voice that read the first seven digits, or the wordzero read in a voice different from the one that read the first seven digits. In half the series, all nine digits were read in the same voice. The final two digits of the remaining series were isolated by having them read in a voice different from the one that read the first seven digits. Zero suffixes disrupted recall of the terminal digits more than the buzzer (the stimulus suffix effect) and had a greater degrading effect when they were in the same voice as the final two digits than when the zero suffixes and the final digits were read in different voices. Isolated digits were more likely to be recalled than nonisolated digits. Results suggest the importance of perceptual analysis in both the stimulus suffix effect and the isolation effect.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cermak, L. S.Human memory: Research and theory. New York: Ronald, 1972.
Cimbalo, R. S. Short-term memory: The isolation effect with controlled output. Proceedings, 78th Annual Convention, APA, 1970, 5, 81–82.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.
Crowder, R. G. Improved recall for digits with delayed recall cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 82, 258–262.
Crowder, R. G. Waiting for the stimulus suffix: Decay, delay, rhythm, and readout in immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 23,324–340.
Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS). Perception & Psychophysics, 1969, 5, 365–373.
Crowder, R. G., & Raeburn, V. P. The stimulus suffix effect with reversed speech. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 342–345.
Elmes, D. G., Sanders, L. W., & Dovel, J. C. Isolation of massed-and distributed-practice items. Memory & Cognition, 1973, 1, 77–79.
Massaro, D. W. Perceptual processes and forgetting in memory tasks. Psychological Review, 1970, 77, 557–567.
Moray, N.Listening and attention. Middlesex, England: Penguin, 1969.
Morton, J., Crowder, R. G., & Prussin, H. A. Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 91, 169–190.
Neisser, U.Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Norman, D. A.Memory and attention. New York: Wiley, 1969.
Wallace, W. P. Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the yon Restorff phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 63, 410–424.
Waugh, N. C. Free recall of conspicuous items. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1969, 8, 448–456.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by a Robert E. Lee Research Grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elmes, D.G. Isolation of items and the stimulus suffix effect. Memory & Cognition 2, 345–348 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209007
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209007