Abstract
Four types of supporting evidence for inferences of biological constraints on conditioning are evaluated: (1) unexpected failures to condition (discriminative leverpress avoidance); (2) rapid or one-trial learning (taste-aversion studies); (3) crossover learning effects (the Garcia-Koelling effect); and (4) unique predictions from biological constraint-based frameworks. According to a current logic model of scientific explanation and prediction, none of these types of evidence is adequately compelling for inferences of biological constraints. The core problem identified is that negative evidence not attributable to an identified causal factor in terms of E/C (experimental/control) design outcome has been used to both reject general-process learning laws and compel inferences of biological constraints. A design solution using a blocking E/C conditioning paradigm is presented.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Berger, D. F. (1969). Alternative interpretation of the frustrative effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 475–483.
Berger, D. F., &Brush, R. F. (1975). Rapid acquisition of discretetrial lever press avoidance: Effects of signal-shock interval.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,24, 227–239.
Bergmann, G. (1957).Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Berk, A. M., &Miller, R. R. (1978). LiCl-induced aversion to audiovisual cues as a function of response measure and CS-US interval.Behavioral Biology,24, 158–208.
Best, P. J., Best, M. R., &Mickley, A. (1973). Conditioned aversion to distinct environmental stimuli resulting from gastro-intestinal disease.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 250–259.
Bolles, R. C. (1970). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review,77, 32–48.
Bolles, R. C. (1975).Learning theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Brush, F. R. (1966). On the differences between animals that learn and do not learn to avoid electric shock.Psychonomic Science,5, 123–124.
Daly, M., Rauschenberger, J., &Behrends, P. (1982). Food aversion learning in kangaroo rats: A specialist-generalist comparison.Animal Learning & Behavior,10, 314–320.
D’Amato, M. R., &Schiff, D. (1964). Long-term discriminative avoidance performance in the rat.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,57, 123–126.
Damianopoulos, E. N. (1987). Conditioning, attention and the CS− US interval: A theoretical statement of relations.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,22, 16–29.
Damianopoulos, E. N. (1982). Necessary and sufficient factors in classical conditioning.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,17, 215–229.
Delamater, A. R., LoLordo, V. M., &Berridge, K. C. (1986). Control of fluid palatability by exteroceptive Pavlovian signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,12, 143–152.
Delamater, A. R., &Tait, R. (1987). Taste aversion conditioning with shock but not with LiCl are sensitive to anxiolytic effects of chlordiazepoxide.Proceedings and Abstracts of the Annual Meetings of the EPA,55, 56.
Domjan, M. (1980). Ingestional aversion learning: Unique and general processes. In J. S. Rosenblatt, R. A. Hinde, C. Beer, & M. C. Busnel (Eds.).Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 275–336). New York: Academic Press.
Domjan, M. (1983). Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: Implications for general-process theory. In G. H. Bower & J. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 215–277). New York: Academic Press.
Domjan, M. (1985). Cue-consequence specificity and long-delay learning revisited.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,443, 54–66.
Domjan, M., &Galef, B. J., Jr. (1983). Biological constraints on instrumental and classical conditioning: Retrospect and prospectAnimal Learning & Behavior,11, 151–161.
Domjan, M., &Levy, C. J. (1977). Taste aversion conditioned by the aversiveness of insulin and formalin. Role of CS-specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 119–131.
Domjan, M., &Wilson, N. E. (1972). Specificity of cue to consequence in aversion learning in the rat.Psychonomic Science,26, 143–145.
Durkovic, R. G. (1975). Classical conditioning, sensitization and habituation in the spinal cat.Physiology & Behavior,14, 297–304.
Durkovic, R. G. (1983) Classical conditioning of the flexion reflex facilitation in the spinal cat: Features of the reflex circuitry.Neuroscience Letters,39, 155–160.
Durkovic, R. G. (1985). Retention of classically conditioned reflex facilitation in the spinal cat.Behavioral Neural Biology,43, 12–20.
Furedy, J. J. (1978) Conceptual analyses and method in psychology In J. P. Suttcliffe (Ed.),Essays in honor of W. M. O’Neill. Sydney. University of Sydney Press.
Garcia, J., Ervin, F. R., &Koelling, R. A. (1966). Learning with prolonged delay of reinforcement.Psychonomic Science,5, 121–122.
Garcia, J., &Koelling, R. A. (1966). Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance learning.Psychonomic Science,4, 123–124.
Garcia, J., Lasiter, P. S., Bermudez-Rattoni, F., &Deems, D. A. (1985). A general theory of aversion learning.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,443, 8–21.
Garcia, J., McGowan, B. K., &Green, K. R. (1972). Biological constraints in conditioning. In A. H. Black & W. R. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning (Vol. 2, pp. 3–27). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gormezano, I. (1966). Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp 385–420). New York. McGraw-Hill.
Gormezano, I. (1972). Investigation of defense and reward conditioning in the rabbit. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning (Vol. 2, pp. 151–181). New York. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Gormezano, I., &Kehoe, E. J. (1975) Classical conditioning: Some methodological issues In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol 2, pp. 143–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grunbaum, A. (1969). Can we ascertain the falsity of scientific hypotheses? In E. Nagel, S. Bromberger, & A. Grunbaum (Eds.),Observation and theory in science (pp 271–301) Baltimore. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Harre, R. (1970)The principles of scientific thinking. Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Hawkins, R. D., &Kandel, E. R. (1984). Is there a cell-biological alphabet for simple forms of learning?Psychological Review,91, 375–391.
Hempel, C. G. (1963) Explanation and prediction by covering laws. In B. Baumrin (Ed.),Philosophy of science: The Delaware Seminar (Vol. 1, pp 107–133). New York: Wiley.
Hesse, M. (1974).The structure of scientific inference. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Kamin, L. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.),Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kandel, E. R., &Schwartz, J. H. (1982). Molecular biology of learning: Modulation of transmitter release.Science,218, 433–443.
Krane, R. V. (1980). Toxiphobia conditioning with exteroceptive cuesAnimal Learning & Behavior,8, 513–523.
Krane, R. V., &Wagner, A. R. (1975). Taste-aversion learning with a delayed shock US: Implications for “the generality of the laws of learning.”Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,88, 882–889.
Kuhn, R. S. (1962)The structure of scientific revolutions Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Logue, A. W. (1979). Taste aversion and the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Bulletin,86, 276–296.
Mackintosh, N. J. (1983).Conditioning, attention, and associative learning. New York: Oxford University Press.
McGuigan, F. J. (1983).Experimental psychology: Methods of research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mill, J. S. (1843).A system of logic. London: J. D. Parker Publishers.
Miller, V., &Domjan, M. (1981). Specificity of cue to consequence in aversion learning in the rat: Control for US-induced differential orientations.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 339–345.
Mitchell, D., Scott, D. W., &Mitchell, L. K. (1977) Attenuated and enhanced neophobia in the taste-aversion “delay of reinforcement” effect.Animal Learning & Behavior,5, 99–102.
Moore, B. R. (1973). The role of directed Pavlovian reactions to simple instrumental learning in the pigeon. In R. A. Hinde & J. Stevenson-Hinde (Eds.),Constraints on learning (pp. 159–186). New York: Academic Press.
Rozin, R., &Kalat, J. W. (1971). Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning.Psychological Review,78, 459–486.
Schwartz, P. J. (1974) On going back to nature: A review of Seligman’s and Hager’sBiological boundaries of learning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,21, 183–184.
Seligman, M. E. (1970) On the generality of the laws of learning.Psychological Review,77, 406–418.
Seligman, M. E. P., &Hager, J. L. (1972)Biological boundaries of learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Sheafor, P. J. (1975). “Pseudoconditioning” of jaw movement of the rabbit reflects associations conditioned to contextual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,1, 245–260.
Shettleworth, S. J. (1972) Constraints on learning. In D. S. Lehrman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Shaw (Eds.),Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 4, pp 1–68). New York: Academic Press.
Timberlake, W. (1983). The functional organization of appetitive behavior. Behavior systems and learning. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzern (Eds.),Advances in the analysis of behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 177–221). New York: Wiley.
Timberlake, W., &Grant, D. L. (1975). Auto-shaping in rats to the presentation of another rat predicting food.Science,190, 690–692.
Weisinger, R. S., Parker, L. F., &Skorupski, J. D. (1974). Conditioned taste aversions and specific need states m the rat.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,87, 655–660.
Wright, H. S. (1964). Summation and backward masking.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,36, 923–932.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damianopoulos, E.N. Biological constraints revisited: A critique. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 234–242 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207639
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207639