Abstract
The time until an approaching object will pass an observer (time to passage, or TTP) is optically specified by a global flow field even in the absence of local expansion or size cues. Kaiser and Mowafy (1993) have demonstrated that observers are in fact sensitive to this global flow information. The present studies investigate two factors that are usually ignored in work related to TTP: (1) non-constant motion functions and (2) concomitant eye rotation. Non-constant velocities violate an assumption of some TTP derivations, and eye rotations may complicate heading extraction. Such factors have practical significance, for example, in the case of a pilot accelerating an aircraft or executing a roll. In our studies, a flow field of constant-sized stars was presented monocularly on a large screen. TTP judgments had to be made on the basis of one target star. The flow field varied in its acceleration pattern and its roll component. Observers did not appear to utilize acceleration information. In particular, TTPs with decelerating motion were consistently underestimated. TTP judgments were fairly robust with respect to roll, even when roll axis and track vector were decoupled. However, substantial decoupling between heading and track vector led to a decrement in performance, in both the presence and the absence of roll.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bootsma, R. J., &Oudejans, R. R. D. (1993). Visual information about time-to-collision between two objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1041–1052.
Calderone, J. B., &Kaiser, M. K. (1989). Visual acceleration detection: Effect of sign and motion orientation.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 391–394.
Freeman, T. C. A., Harris, M. G., &Tyler, P. A. (1994). Human sensitivity to temporal proximity: The role of spatial and temporal speed gradients.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 689–699.
Gottsdanker, R. M. (1952). The accuracy of prediction motion.Journal of Experimental Psychology,43, 26–36.
Gottsdanker, R. M., Frick, J. W., &Lockard, R. B. (1961). Identifying the acceleration of visual targets.British Journal of Psychology,52, 31–42.
Jagacinski, R. J., Johnson, W. W., &Miller, R. A. (1983). Quantifying the cognitive trajectories of extrapolated movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 43–57.
Kaiser, M. K., &Mowafy, L. (1993). Optical specification of time-topassage: Observers’ sensitivity to global tau.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1028–1040.
Lee, D. N. (1976). A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision.Perception,5, 437–459.
Lee, D. N., &Reddish, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics.Nature,293, 293–294.
Lee, D. N., Young, D. S., Reddish, P. E., Lough, S., &Clayton, T. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 333–346.
McKee, S. P. (1981). A local mechanism for differential velocity detection.Vision Research,21, 491–500.
Navarro, R., Banks, M. S., &Ehrlich, S. (1994). Local and global methods for estimating time-to-contact and time-to-passage.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science,35, 1999.
Perrone, J. A. (1992). Model for the computation of self-motion in biological systems.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,9, 177–194.
Perrone, J. A., &Stone, L. S. (1994). A model of self-motion estimation within primate extrastriate visual cortex.Vision Research,34, 2917–2938.
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1975). Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 395–403.
Royden, C. S., Banks, M. S., &Crowell, J. A. (1992). The perception of heading during eye movements.Nature,360, 583–585.
Runeson, S. (1974). Constant velocity—not perceived as such.Psychological Research,37, 3–23.
Schiff, W., &Oldak, R. (1990). Accuracy of judging time to arrival: Effects of modality, trajectory, and gender.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 303–316.
Schmerler, J. (1976). The visual perception of accelerated motion.Perception,5, 167–185.
Simpson, W. A. (1988). Depth discrimination from optic flow.Perception,17, 497–512.
Tresilian, J. R. (1991). Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 865–876.
Tresilian, J. R. (1993). Four questions of time to contact: A critical examination of research on interceptive timing.Perception,22, 653–680.
Tresilian, J. R. (1994). Approximate information sources and perceptual variables in interceptive timing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 154–173.
Warren, W. H., &Hannon, D. J. (1990). Eye movements and optical flow.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,7, 160–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Heiko Hecht’s work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Research Council. This research was funded by NASA RTOP 538-04-11. Portions of this research were presented at the 35th meeting of the Psychonomic Society and the 1994 meeting of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaiser, M.K., Hecht, H. Time-to-passage judgments in nonconstant optical flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 817–825 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206797
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206797