Abstract
The redundant-signals effect is the observed RT advantage for trials presenting two or more targets, as compared with trials with only one target Two general classes of parallel-processing model have been proposed to explain this effect race models (e.g., Raab, 1962) and coactivation models (e.g., Miller, 1982). Various distributional analyses have been used in work aimed at discriminating between these two model classes. The present study reexamined one of these tests—the combination-rule regression analysis based on variable-criterion theory (Grice, Canham, & Boroughs, 1984)—by applying it to the data from two sets of simulated experiments. One set of simulations assumed coactivation; the other set assumed an independent race on redundant-target trials. Nearly identical combination-rule values were observed in the two sets of simulations. This finding shows that the combination rule of variable-criterion theory does not discriminate between models capable of explaining the redundant-signals effect The implications of this finding are briefly discussed
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, N. H. (1962). Application of an additive model to impression formation.Science,138, 817–818.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 486–490.
Colonius, H. (1990). Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,34, 253–275.
Diederich, A., &Colonius, H. (1987). Intersensory facilitation in the motor component?Psychological Research,49, 23–29.
Egeth, H. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 245–252.
Egeth, H. E., &Mordkoff, J. T. (1991). Redundancy gain revisited: Evidence of parallel processing of color and form. In J. Pomerantz & G. Locknead (Eds.),The perception of structure (pp. 131–143). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Eriksen, C. W. (1988). A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 191–193.
Fournier, L. R., &Eriksen, C. W. (1990). Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 538–550.
Grice, G. R. (1968). Stimulus intensity and response evocation.Psychological Review,75, 359–373.
Grice, G. R., Canham, L., &Boroughs, J. M. (1984). Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 451–463.
Grice, G. R., Nullmeyer, R., &Spiker, V. A. (1982). Human reaction time: Toward a general theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology; General,111, 135–153.
Holmgren, J. L., Joula, J. F., &Atkinson, R. C. (1974). Response latency in visual search with redundancy in the visual display.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 123–128.
Miller, J. (1978). Multidimensional same-different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 411–422.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.Cognitive Psychology,14, 247–279.
Miller, J. (1988). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output.Acta Psychologica,67, 1–67.
Miller, J., &Lopes, A. (1988). Testing race models by estimating the smaller of two true mean or true median reaction times: An analysis of estimation bias.Perception Sc Psychophysics,44, 513–524,
Miller, J., &Lopes, A. (1991). Bias produced by fast guessing in distribution-based tests of race models.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 584–590.
Mordkoff, J. T., &Yantis, S. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 520–538,
Mulligan, R. M., &Shaw, M. L. (1980). Multimodal signal detection: Independent decisions vs. integration.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 471–478.
Mullin, P. A., Egeth, H. E., &Mordkoff, J. T. (1988). Redundanttarget detection and processing capacity: The problem of positional preferences.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 607–610.
Raab, D. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction time.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,43, 574–590.
Schwarz, W. (1989). A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 498–500.
Shaw, M. L. (1982). Attending to multiple sources of information: I. The integration of information in decision making.Cognitive Psychology,14, 353–409.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial location: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance (Vol. 10, pp. 106–121), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sidowski, J. B., &Anderson, N. H. (1967). Judgments of City-Occupation combinations.Psychonomic Science,7, 279–280.
Ulrich, R., &Giray, M. (1986). Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency.Perception & Psychophysics,39, 248–254.
Van Der Heuden, A. H. C. (1975). Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel self-terminating process in simple visual search tasks.Acta Psychologica,39, 21–41,
Van der Heuden, A, H. C., La Heu, W., &Boer, J. P. A. (1983). Parallel processing of redundant targets in simple search tasks.Psychological Research,45, 235–254,
Van der Heuden, A. H. C, Schreuder, R., Maris, L., &Nee-Rincx, M. (1984). Some evidence for correlated separate activations in a simple letter-detection task.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 577–585.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by Public Health Service Training Grant T32-MH14268. The central finding of this study was first noted in the analysis of the smaller set of simulations reported by Egeth and Mordkoff (1991). Thanks are due Howard Egeth, Robert Grice, Cathleen Moore, two anonymous reviewers, and (especially) Jeff Miller for their advice and comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mordkoff, J.T. Testing models of the redundant-signals effect: A warning concerning the combination-rule regression analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 52, 589–594 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206721
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206721