Abstract
In the present study, we investigated whether patterns of letter detection for function and content words in texts are affected by the familiarity of the material being read. In Experiment 1, subjects searched for target letters in sentences that had been rehearsed prior to performing the letter detection on them as well as on unfamiliar sentences. In Experiment 2, subjects searched for target letters in highly familiar verses (e.g., nursery rhymes) and in unfamiliar sentences that were matched to the familiar verses. A disadvantage in letter detection for function as compared with content words consistently found with unfamiliar passages was reduced significantly with the familiar material in both experiments. Specifically, letter detection for content words grew worse in familiar text, but letter detection for function words showed a contrasting modest, though nonsignificant, improvement. The results are consistent with the proposition that in very familiar texts, parafoveal analysis permits the identification of generally less familiar content words. Simultaneously, the normal pattern of weighing the structure and content elements of text changes so that more fixations on function words occur than when one is reading unfamiliar texts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading.Cognitive Psychology,17c, 364–390.
Bock, K., &Loebell, H. (1990). Framing sentences.Cognition,35, 1–39.
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism.Developmental Review,10, 3–47.
Carlson, L. A., Alejano, A. R., &Carr, T. (1991). The level-of-focalattention hypothesis in oral reading: Influence of strategies on the context specificity of lexical repetition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 924–931.
Carpenter, P. A., &Just, M. A. (1983). What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.),Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 275–307). New York: Academic Press.
Dell, G. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors.Language & Cognitive Processes,5, 313–349.
Drewnowski, A. &Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.Memory & Cognition,5, 636–647.
Greenberg, S. N., Inhoff, A., Koriat, A., & Seely, R. (2001).Function and frequency interact with preview. Manuscript in preparation.
Greenberg, S. N., &Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1051–1061.
Greenberg, S. N., Koriat, A., &Shapiro, A. (1992). The effects of syntactic structure on letter detection in adjacent function words.Memory & Cognition,20, 663–670.
Haber, R. N., &Schindler, R. M. (1981). Error in proofreading: Evidence of syntactic control of letter processing?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 573–579.
Hadley, J. A., &Healy, A. F. (1991). When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the unitization reading model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1062–1073.
Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 235–242.
Healy, A. F. (1980). Proofreading errors on the word the: New evidence of reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 45–57.
Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 333–344.
Healy, A. F., &Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in misspelled words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 413–426.
Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., &McNamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 279–290.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1991). Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 1035–1050.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1994). The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 345–356.
Koriat, A., &Greenberg, S. N. (1996). The enhancement effect in letter detection: Further evidence for the structural model of reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1184–1195.
Levy, B. A. (1983). Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing.Memory & Cognition,11, 1–12.
Levy, B. A., Barnes, L., &Martin, L. (1993). Transfer of fluency across repetitions and across texts.Canadian Journal of Psychology,44, 465–482.
Levy, B. A., &Begin, J. (1984). Proofreading familiar text: Allocating resources to perceptual and conceptual processes.Memory & Cognition,12, 621–632.
Levy, B. A., Di Persio, R., &Hollingshead, A. (1992). Fluent rereading: Repetition, automaticity, and discrepancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 957–971.
Levy, B. A., Newell, S., Snyder, J., &Timmins, K. (1986). Processing changes across reading encounters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 467–478.
Moravcsik, J. E., &Healy, A. F. (1995). The effect of meaning on letter detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 82–95.
Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.
Proctor, J. D., &Healy, A. F. (1995). Acquisition and retention of skilled letter detection. In A. F. Healy & L. Bourne (Eds.),Learning and memory of knowledge and skills: Durability and specificity (pp. 282–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raney, G. E. (1993). Monitoring changes in cognitive loading during reading: An event-related brain potential and reaction time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 51–69.
Raney, G. E., &Rayner, K. (1995). Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of text.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 151–172.
Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1989).The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rayner, K., &Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 504–509.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. M., &Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.Psychological Review,105, 125–157.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 318–334.
Saint-Aubin, J., &Poirier, M. (1997). The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French.Memory & Cognition,25, 666–676.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 1–17.
Schmauder, A. R., Morris, R. K., &Poynor, D. V. (2000). Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: Evidence from priming and eye fixations.Memory & Cognition,28, 1098–1108.
Tardif, T., &Craik, F. I. M. (1989). Rereading a week later: Perceptual and conceptual factors.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 107–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The article was prepared in part with the support of an NSF-ROA to S.G. under Grant NSF 9810169 awarded to Albrecht Inhoff.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenberg, S.N., Tai, J. Letter detection in very familiar texts. Memory & Cognition 29, 1088–1095 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206377
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206377