Abstract
Olfactory aversion conditioning of preweanling rats, 10 or 18 days postnatal, was tested after some had been given nonreinforced experience with the to-be-conditioned odor stimulus. In three experiments, it was established that the amount of prior exposure to the CS determined the effectiveness of conditioning. For both ages, odor-shock conditioning was more likely impaired with longer durations of preexposure. This effect was more apparent in the older animals. Low to moderate degrees of prior exposure to the CS under some conditions facilitated, rather than impaired, olfactory conditioning in the 10-day-old rat. This result is in agreement with one previous study in which facilitation in learning was reported for this age after short-term preexposure to the CS. The present study adds to previous data on differential effects of CS preexposure on conditioning. Although the conditions under which facilitation rather than impairment occurs are not yet clear, age-related differences in the effects of CS preexposure were apparent in the present experiments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bateson, P. P. G., &Chantrey, D. F. (1972). Retardation of discrimination learning in monkeys and chicks previously exposed to both stimuli.Nature,237, 173–174.
Bryan, R. G. (1979).Retention of odor-footshock conditioning in neonatal rats: Effects of distribution of practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
Channel, S., &Hall, G. (1981). Facilitation and retardation of discrimination learning after exposure to the stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,7, 437–446.
Gibson, E. J., &Walk, R. D. (1956). The effect of prolonged exposure to visually presented patterns on learning to discriminate them.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,49, 239–242.
Hall, G. (1980). Exposure learning in animals.Psychological Bulletin,88, 535–550.
Hill, W. F. (1978). Effects of mere exposure on preferences in non-human mammals.Psychological Bulletin,85, 1177–1198.
Hoffmann, H., & Spear, N. E. (1984).Behavioral indices of a conditioned odor preference in 10-, 12-, and 14-day old rat pups. Paper presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Baltimore, MD.
Keppel, G. (1982).Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kessler, P., &Spear, N. E. (1980). Neonatal thyroxine treatment enhances classical conditioning in the infant rat.Hormones & Behavior,14, 204–210.
Kraemer, P. J., Hoffman, H., &Spear, N. E. (1988). Attenuation of the CS-preexposure effect after a retention interval in preweanling rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,16, 185–190.
Kucharski, D., &Spear, N. E. (1984). Conditioning of aversion to an odor paired with peripheral shock in the developing rat.Developmental Psychobiology,17, 465–479.
Lubow, R. E. (1973). Latent inhibition.Psychological Bulletin,79, 398–407.
Lubow, R. E., Rifkin, B., &Alek, M. (1976). The context effect: The relationship between stimulus preexposure and environmental preexposure determines subsequent learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,2, 38–47.
Markiewicz, B., Kucharski, D., &Spear, N. E. (1986). Ontogenetic comparison of memory for Pavlovian conditioned aversions to temperature, vibration, odor, or brightness.Developmental Psychobiology,19, 139–154.
Misanin, J. R., Blatt, L. A., &Hinderliter, C. F. (1985). Age dependency in neophobia: Its influence on taste-aversion learning and the flavor-preexposure effect in rats.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 69–76.
Misanin, J. R., Guanowsky, V., &Riccio, D. C. (1983). The effect of CS-preexposure on conditioned taste aversion in young and adult rats.Physiology & Behavior,30, 859–862.
Rudy, J. W., &Cheatle, M. D. (1979). Ontogeny of associative learning: Acquisition of odor aversions by neonatal rats. In N. E. Spear & B. A. Campbell (Eds.),Ontogeny of learning and memory (pp. 157–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rudy, J. W., Rosenburg, L., &Sandell, J. H. (1977). Disruption of taste familiarity effect by novel exteroceptive stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,3, 26–36.
Serwatka, J., Molina, J. C., &Spear, N. E. (1986). Weanlings’ transfer of conditioned ethanol aversion from olfaction to ingestion depends on the unconditioned stimulus.Behavioral & Neural Biology,45, 57–70.
Serwatka, J., &Spear, N. E. (1988). Acquisition and retention of separate elements of a conditioned olfactory discrimination in preweanling rats.Developmental Psychobiology,21, 145–159.
Spear, N. E., &Smith, G. J. (1978). Alleviation of forgetting in preweanling rats.Developmental Psychobiology,11, 513–529.
Wagner, A. R. (1976). Priming in the STM: An information-processing mechanism for self-generated or retrieval-generated depression in performance. In T. J. Tigue & R. N. Leaton (Eds.),Habituation: Perspectives from child development, animal behavior, and neurophysiology (pp. 95–128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wagner, A. R. (1978). Expectancies and priming in the STM. In S. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.),Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 177–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health (1 RO1 MH35219 to N. E. Spear and 1 F31 MH09469 to H. Hoffmann).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoffmann, H., Spear, N.E. Facilitation and impairment of conditioning in the preweanling rat after prior exposure to the conditioned stimulus. Animal Learning & Behavior 17, 63–69 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205213
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205213