Abstract
A model is developed which holds that pure-tone intensity discrimination and suprathreshold loudness judgments are based on the same sensory representation. In this model, loudness is a power function of sound intensity. When two tones are presented sequentially, each gives rise to a loudness value along the sensory continuum. In intensity-discrimination experiments, threshold is reached when the loudness difference between the tones exceeds a criterial value. For suprathreshold presentations of tone pairs, judgments of loudness differences are based on the loudness difference between the two tones. The model is shown to accord well with data from both classes of experiments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barlow, H. B. Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations.Journal of Physiology (London), 1957,136, 469–488.
Blackwell, H. R. Contrast thresholds of the human eye.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1946,36, 624–634.
Campbell, R. A., Lasky, E. Z. Masker level and sinusoidal signal detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967,42, 972–976.
Cornsweet, T. N., &Pinsker, H. M. Luminance discrimination of brief flashes under various conditions of adaptation.Journal of Physiology, 1965,176, 294–310.
Falmagne, J. C. The generalized Fechner problem and discrimination.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971,8, 22–43.
Falmagne, J. C. Foundations of Fechnerian psychophysics. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Freeman, 1974.
Graybill, F. A.An introduction to linear statistical models (Vol. 1). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961.
Hood, D. C., &Finkelstein, M. Comparison of changes in sensitivity and sensation: Implications for the response-intensity function of the human photopic system.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 391–405.
Jesteadt, W., Wier, C. C., &Green, D. M. Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977,61, 160–177.
Luce, R. D., &Green, D. M. A neural timing theory for response times and the psychophysics of intensity.Psychological Review, 1972,79, 14–57.
Mansfield, R. J. W. Visual adaptation: Retinal transduction, brightness and sensitivity.Vision Research, 1976,16, 679–690.
Marks, L. Stimulus-range, number of categories and form of the category scale.American Journal of Psychology, 1968,81, 467–479.
Marks, L. On scales of sensation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 358–376.
McGill, W. J. The slope of the loudness function: A puzzle. In H. Gulliksen & S. Messick (Eds.),Psychological scaling: Theory and application. New York: Wiley, 1960.
McGill, W. J. Neural counting mechanisms and energy detection in audition.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1967,3, 351–376.
McGill, W. J., &Goldberg, J. P. Pure-tone energy discrimination and energy detection.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1968,44, 576–581. (a)
McGill, W. J., &Goldberg, J. P. A study of the near-miss involving Weber’s law and pure-tone intensity discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics, 1968,4, 105–109. (b)
Parker, S., &Schneider, B. Nonmetric scaling of loudness and pitch using similarity and difference estimates.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 238–242.
Penner, M. M., Leshowitz, B., Cudahy, E., &Ricard, G. Intensity discrimination for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,15, 568–570.
Richards, A. M. Non-metric scaling of loudness. I. 1000-Hz tones.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,56, 582–588.
Rule, S. J., Curtis, D. W., &Markley, R. P. Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 343–349.
Schacknow, P. N., &Raab, D. H. Intensity discrimination of tone bursts and the form of the Weber function.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 449–450.
Scharf, B., &Stevens, S. S. The form of the loudness function near threshold. InProceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Acoustics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1961.
Schneider, B., Parker, S., Farrell, G., &Kanow, G. The perceptual basis of loudness ratio judgments.Perception & Psychophysics, 1976,19, 309–320.
Schneider, B., Parker, S., &Stein, D. The measurement of loudness using direct comparisons of sensory intervals.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1974,11, 259–273.
Stevens, S. S. The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics.American Psychologist, 1962,17, 29–39.
Stevens, S. S.Psychophysics. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1975.
Viemeister, N. F. Intensity discrimination of pulsed sinusoids: The effects of filtered noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972,51, 1265–1269.
Wagenaar, W. A. Stevens vs. Fechner: A plea for dismissal of the case.Acta Psychologica, 1975,39, 225–235.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported in part by a National Research Council grant to B. Schneider.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parker, S., Schneider, B. Loudness and loudness discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 28, 398–406 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204883
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204883