Abstract
Single-letter statistical measures providing values for each letter-position and word-length combination are too unwieldy for use in working letter-recognition models; more compact tables are needed. Compact tables collapsing word length to short or long words and letter positions to first, last, or middle letters are presented for the frequency and versatility of single letters. Letter-position and word-size differences are preserved in this reduced format. To test awareness of these values, subjects rate the commonness of letters in each letter position. Their responses indicate high intersubject agreement and correlate highly with the frequency and versatility measures. A LISP program that translates the letter knowledge for each letter into a corresponding knowledge for each feature in a feature set is described. Distinctiveness values for each feature (see Shimron & Navon, 1981) are computed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Appelman, I. B., &Mayzner, M. S. The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 436–446.
Bridoeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G., &Nagle, M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979,5, 692–700.
Briggs, R., &Hovecar, D. A new distinctive feature theory for upper case letters.Journal of General Psychology, 1975,93, 87–93.
Butler, B. E. Selective attention and stimulus localization in visual perception.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1980,34, 119–133.
Butler, B. E. The category effect in visual search: Identification versus localization factors.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1980,34, 238–247.
Butler, B. E. Identification and localization in tachistoscopic recognition: The effects of data and resource limitation.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1981,35, 36–51.
Drewnowski, A. Detection errors on the wordthe: Evidence for the acquisition of reading levels.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 403–409.
Drewnowski, A. Missing -ing in reading: Developmental changes in reading units.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1981,31, 154–168.
Drewnowski, A., &Healy, A. F. Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word.Memory A Cognition, 1977,5, 636–647.
Drewnowski, A., &Healy, A. F. Missing -ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word endings.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 247–262.
Geyer, L., &Dewald, C. Feature lists and confusion matrices.Perception A Psychophysics, 1973,14, 471–482.
Healy, A. F. Detection errors on the wordthe: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 235–242.
Healy, A. F. Proofreading errors on the wordthe: New evidence on reading units.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 45–57.
Healy, A. F., &Drewnowski, A. Investigating the boundaries of reading units: Letter detection in misspelled words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1983,9, 413–426.
Kent, W.The brains of men and machines. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
Keren, G., &Baggen, S. Recognition models of alphanumeric characters.Perception A Psychophysics, 1981,29, 234–246.
Krumhansl, C. L., &Thomas, E. A. C. Extracting identity and location information from briefly presented letter arrays.Perception A Psychophysics, 1976,20, 243–258.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Lindsay, P., &Norman, D.Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Mayzner, M. S., &Tresselt, M. E. Tables of single-letter and diagram frequency counts for various word-length and letter-position combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965,1, 13–32.
Milner, P. A model for visual shape recognition.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 521–535.
Rawlinson, G. E. Bigram frequency counts and anagram lists.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1976,28, 125–142.
Shimron, J., &Navon, D. The distribution of information within letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1981,30, 483–491.
Solso, R. L. Positional frequency and versatility of letters for six-, seven-, and eight-letter English words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1979,11, 355–358.
Solso, R. L., &King, J. F. Frequency and versatility of letters in the English language.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 1976,8, 283–286.
Wandmacher, J., Shapiro, R., &Mohr, W. Letter familiarity does not aid feature extraction.Psychological Research, 1981,43, 33–43.
Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary. Springfield, Mass: Merriam, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Computing equipment used in compiling the tables and producing the program in this paper was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Grant A-9581 to Brian E. Butler of Queen’s University. The author was supported by the same institution while the paper was in preparation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrison, I. Compact representations of positional knowledge in short and long words for letters and features. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 15, 406–412 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203673
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203673