Abstract
The description of the sensory interaction between two taste substances in terms of numerical responses obtained under a magnitude estimation instruction is biased, because the sensory processes are confounded with the judgmental process. Because the judgmental process is irrelevant to the sensory processes involved in the perception of taste substance mixtures, a correct description of mixture interaction can be obtained only with an experimental setup that separates the sensory processes from the judgmental process. Functional measurement in combination with a two-stimulus procedure can separate these two mechanisms. When this approach is used, parallelism in the factorial plot of the responses depends not on the underlying sensory processes, but on the comparative operation between two sensory impressions and on the form of the judgment function. In this experiment, solutions of glucose, three equiratio mixture types of glucose and fructose (i.e., mixtures in which the ratio of the components is constant), and fructose were compared with glucose solutions for sweetness intensity. Under the assumption that the comparative operation between two perceived sweetness intensities is subtractive, this scaling procedure yields interval scales of perceived sweetness intensity. The results showed that the data obtained are reliable, and that the psychophysical functions for equiratio mixtures of glucose and fructose lie in between the psychophysical functions for unmixed glucose and fructose.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, N. H. (1974) Algebraic models in perception. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds).Handbook of perception (Vol 2. pp 215–298) New York Academic Press
Anderson.N. H. (1981)Foundations of information integration theory New York Academic Press
Anderson, N. H. (1982)Methods of information integration theory New York Academic Press
Attneave, F. (1962). Perception and related areas. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 4, pp. 619–659). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bartoshuk, L. M. (1975). Taste mixtures: Is mixture suppression related to compression?Physiology & Behavior,14, 643–649.
Bartoshuk, L. M. (1977). Psychophysical studies of taste mixtures. In J. Le Magnen & P. MacLeod (Eds.),Olfaction and taste VI (pp. 377–384). London: I.R.L.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1980). Comparison of two theories of ‘ratio’ and ‘difference’ judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology General,109, 304–319.
Birnbaum.M. H. (1982). Controversies in psychological measurement In B. Wegener (Ed.),Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 401–485). Hillsdale, NJ-Erlbaum.
Birnbaum, M. H., &Elmasian, R. (1977). Loudness “ratios” and “differences” involve the same psychophysical operation.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 383–391
Birnbaum, M. H., &Mellers, B. A. (1978). Measurement and the mental map.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 403–408
Birnbaum, M. H., &Veit, C. T. (1974). Scale convergence as a criterion for rescating: Information integration with difference, ratio, and averaging tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,15, 7–15.
Bogartz, R. S. (1980). Some functional measurement procedures for determining the psychophysical law.Perception & Psychophysics,27, 284–294.
Curtis, D W., Attneave, F., &Harrington, T. L. (1968). A test of a two-stage model of magnitude judgment.Perception & Psychophysics,3, 25–31.
Curtis, D. W., Stevens, D. A., &Lawless, H. T. (1984) Perceived intensity of the taste of sugar mixtures and acid mixturesChemical Senses,9, 107–120.
De Graaf.C., &Frijters, J. E. R. (1986). A psychophysical investigation of Beidler’s mixture equation.Chemical Senses,11, 295–314.
De Graaf, C., &Frijters, J. E. R. (1987). Sweetness intensity of a binary sugar mixture lies in between intensities of its components, when each is tasted alone and at the same total molarity as the mixture.Chemical Senses,12, 113–129.
Frijters, J. E. R. (in press). Psychophysical models for mixtures of tastants and mixtures of odourants. In S D Roper (Ed),Olfaction and taste IX.
Frijters, J. E. R., De Graaf, C., &Koolen, H. C. M. (1984) The validity of the equiratio taste mixture model investigated with sorbitol-sucrose mixtures.Chemical Senses,9, 241–248.
Frijters, J. E. R., &Oude Ophuis, P. A. M. (1983) The construction and prediction of psychophysical power functions for the sweetness of equiratio sugar mixturesPerception,12, 753–767.
Frijters, J. E. R., & Stevens, D. A. (1986)Psychophysical taste functions of equiratio acid mixtures. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Hagerty, M., &Birnbaum, M. H. (1978). Nonmetric tests of ratios vs subtractive theories of stimulus comparison.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 121–129
Klitzner, M. D. (1975) Hedonic integration: Test of a linear modelPerception & Psychophysics,18, 49–54
McBride, R. L. (1982).Toward a unified theory of psychophysics Doctoral dissertation, Macquan University, Sydney.
McBride, R. L. (1986) The sweetness of binary mixtures of sucrose, fructose, and glucose.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 584–592.
McKenna, F. P. (1985). Another look at the ‘new psychophysics’ BritishJournal of Psychology,76, 97–109.
Mellers, B. A., Davis, D. M., &Birnbaum, M. H. (1984). Weight of evidence supports one operation for ‘ratios’ and ‘differences’ of heaviness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 216–230.
Moskowitz, H. R. (1971). Intensity scales for pure tastes and for taste mixtures.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 51–56.
Moskowitz, H. R. (1973) Models of sweetness additivityJournal of Experimental Psychology,99, 88–98.
Moskowitz, H. R. (1974a). Models of additivity for sugar sweetness. In H. R. Moskowitz, B Scharf, & J. C. Stevens (Eds.),Sensation and measurement Papers in honor of S. S. Stevens (pp. 379–388) Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel
Moskowitz, H. R. (1974b). Sourness of acid mixturesJournal of Experimental Psychology,102, 640–647.
Rifkin, B., &Bartoshuk, L. M. (1980). Taste synergism between monosodium glutamate and disodium 5’-guanylate.Physiology & Behavior,24, 1169–1172.
Rule, S. J., &Curtis, D. W. (1977). Subject differences in input and output transformations from magnitude estimations of differences.Acta Psychologica,41, 61–65.
Rule, S. J., Curtis, D. W., &Markley, R. P. (1970). Input and output transformations from magnitude estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 343–349.
Shepard, R. N. (1981). Psychological relations and psychophysical scales: On the status of ‘direct’ psychophysical measurement.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,24, 21–57.
Stevens, S. S. (1956). The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes—loudness.American Journal of Psychology,69, 1–25.
Stone, H., &Oliver, S. M. (1969). Measurement of the relative sweetness of selected sweeteners and sweetener mixturesJournal of Food Science,34, 215–222
Stone, H., Oliver, S. M., &Kloehn, J. (1969). Temperature and ph effects on the relative sweetness of suprathreshold mixtures of dex-trose fructose.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 257–260.
Torgerson, W. S. (1961). Distances and ratios in psychophysical scaling.Acta Psychologica,19, 201–205.
Treisman, M. (1964). Sensory scaling and the psychophysical law.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 11–22.
van der Heyden, A., Brussel, L. B. P., Heidema, J. G., Kosmeyer, J. G., &Peer, H. G. (1983) Interrelationships among synergism, potentiation, enhancement and expanded perceived intensity vs. concentration.Journal of Food Science,48, 1192–1196
Veit, C. T. (1978) Ratio and subtractive processes in psychophysical judgment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 81–107
Weiss, D. J. (1972). Averaging: An empirical validity criterion for magnitude estimation.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 385–388.
Yamaguchi, S., Yoshikawa, T., Ikeda, S., &Ninomiya, Y. (1970) Studies on the taste of some sweet substances II. Interrelations among them.Agricultural & Biological Chemistry,34, 187–197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Graaf, C., Frijters, J.E.R. & Van Trijp, H.C.M. Taste interaction between glucose and fructose assessed by functional measurement. Perception & Psychophysics 41, 383–392 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203030
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203030