Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of intensities and binary interactions of four basic tastes between an electronic tongue and a human tongue

  • Published:
Food Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For detection of single taste intensities and binary interactions using an electronic tongue (E-tongue) and the human tongue (H-tongue), the 4 basic flavor substances of sucrose, caffeine, citric acid, and sodium chloride were used. A linear fit was performed using response values of the E-tongue and concentrations of the basic tastes. The taste intensity of the E-tongue was positively correlated with sour and salty substances, but negatively correlated with sweet and bitter substances. All taste intensities were positively correlated with the 4 flavor substances using the H-tongue. A mathematical model of the 4 taste substances on both the E-tongue and H-tongue exhibited a semi-logarithmic form. There were synergistic, dampening, or offset effects on the taste intensity of each flavor substance in binary systems. H-tongue and E-tongue results were consistent for sweet/bitter and salt/sour interactions. H-tongue and E-tongue results were contradictory for salt/sweet and sweet/sour interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith DV, Boughter JD Jr. Neurochemistry of the gustatory system. pp. 109–135. In: Handbook of Neurochemistry and Molecular Neurobiology. Lajtha A, Johnson D (eds). Springer, New York, NY, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laureati M, Pagliarini E, Bassoli A, Borgonovo G. Sensory and hedonic perceptions of Italian and Korean subjects: A cross-cultural study of perilla frutescens. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 23: 1111–1120 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abe K. Studies on taste: Molecular biology and food science. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch. 72: 1647–1656 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudnitskaya A, Polshin E, Kirsanov D, Lammertyn J, Nicolai B, Saison D, Delvaux FR, Delvaux F, Legin A. Instrumental measurement of beer taste attributes using an electronic tongue. Anal. Chim. Acta 646: 111–118 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Toko K. Electronic sensing of tastes. Sensors Update 3: 131–160 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rudnitskaya A, Nieuwoudt H, Muller N, Legin A, du Toit M, Bauer F. Instrumental measurement of bitter taste in red wine using an electronic tongue. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 397: 3051–3060 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pioggia G, Di Francesco F, Marchetti A, Ferro M, Leardi R, Ahluwalia A. A composite sensor array impedentiometric electronic tongue: Part II. Discrimination of basic tastes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 22: 2624–2628 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain H, Panchal R, Pradhan P, Patel H, Pasha T. Electronic tongue: A new taste sensor. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 5: 91–96 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng JY, Keeney MP. Taste masking analysis in pharmaceutical formulation development using an electronic tongue. Int. J. Pharm. 310: 118–124 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rachid O, Simons FE, Rawas-Qalaji M, Simons K. An electronic tongue: Evaluation of the masking efficacy of sweetening and/or flavoring agents on the bitter taste of epinephrine. AAPS PharmSciTech. 11: 550–557 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shackelford SD, Wheeler TL, Koohmaraie M. Relationship between shear force and trained sensory panel tenderness ratings of 10 major muscles from Bos indicus and Bos taurus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 73: 3333–3340 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Keast RSJ, Breslin PAS. An overview of binary taste–taste interactions. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 111–124 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim J, Lawless HT. Detection thresholds and taste qualities of iron salts. Food Qual. Prefer. 17: 513–521 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorenz JK, Reo JP, Hendl O, Worthington JH, Petrossian VD. Evaluation of a taste sensor instrument (electronic tongue) for use in formulation development. Int. J. Pharm. 367: 65–72 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nasri N, Septier C, Beno N, Salles C, Thomas-Danguin T. Enhancing salty taste through odour-taste-taste interactions: Influence of odour intensity and salty tastants’ nature. Food Qual. Prefer. 28: 134–140 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Savant L, McDaniel M. Suppression of sourness: A comparative study involving mixtures of organic acids and sugars. Percept. Psychophys. 66: 642–650 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroeze JHA. The taste of sodium chloride: Masking and adaptation. Chem. Senses 3: 443–449 (1978)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaixiang Tian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, H., Feng, T., Xiao, Z. et al. Comparison of intensities and binary interactions of four basic tastes between an electronic tongue and a human tongue. Food Sci Biotechnol 24, 1711–1715 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0222-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-015-0222-9

Keywords

Navigation