Abstract
A common way for researchers to model or graphically portray spatial knowledge of a large environment is by applying multidimensional scaling (MDS) to a set of pairwise distance estimations. We introduce two MDS-like techniques that incorporate people’s knowledge of directions instead of (or in addition to) their knowledge of distances. Maps of a familiar environment derived from these procedures were more accurate and were rated by participants as being more accurate than those derived from nonmetric MDS. By incorporating people’s relatively accurate knowledge of directions, these methods offer spatial cognition researchers and behavioral geographers a sharper analytical tool than MDS for studying cognitive maps.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, G. L., Siegel, A. W., &Rosinski, R. R. (1978). The role of perceptual context in structuring spatial knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 617–630.
Baird, J. C., Merrill, A. A., &Tannenbaum, J. (1979). Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 92–98.
Batschelet, E. (1981).Circular statistics in biology. London: Academic Press.
Brown, M. A., &Broadway, M. J. (1981). The cognitive maps of adolescents: Confusion about inter-town distances.Professional Geographer,33, 315–325.
Broyden, C. G. (1970). The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms.Journal of the Institute of Mathematics & Its Applications,6, 76–90.
Buttenfield, B. P. (1986). Comparing distortion on sketch maps and MDS configurations.Professional Geographer,38, 238–246.
Carroll, J. D., &Arabie, P. (1980). Multidimensional scaling.Annual Review of Psychology,31, 607–649.
Cheng, K. (1998). Distances and directions are computed separately by honeybees in landmark-based search.Animal Learning & Behavior,26, 455–468.
Chieffi, S., &Allport, D. (1997). Independent coding of target distance and direction in visuo-spatial working memory.Psychological Research,60, 244–250.
Da Silva, J. A, Ruiz, E. M., &Marques, S. L. (1987). Individual differences in magnitude estimates of inferred, remembered, and perceived geographical distance.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,25, 240–243.
Downs, R. M., &Stea, D. (1977).Maps in minds: Reflections on cognitive mapping. London: Harper & Row.
Dryden, I. L., &Mardia, K. V. (1998).Statistical shape analysis. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Everitt, B. S., &Gower, J. C. (1981). Plotting the optimum positions of an array of cortical electrical phosphenes. In V. Barnett (Ed.),Interpreting multivariate data (pp. 279–287). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Fine, B. J., &Kobrick, J. L. (1983). Individual differences in distance estimation: Comparison of judgments in the field with those from projected slides of the same scenes.Perceptual & Motor Skills,57, 3–14.
Fletcher, R. (1970). A new approach to variable metric algorithms.Computer Journal,13, 317–322.
Foley, J. E., &Cohen, A. J. (1984). Working mental representations of the environment.Environment & Behavior,16, 713–729.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990).The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gatrell, A. (1983).Distance and space: A geographical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Goldfarb, D. (1970). A family of variable metric updates derived by variational means.Mathematics of Computation,24, 23–26.
Golledge, R. G. (Ed.) (1999).Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Golledge, R. G., Rayner, J. N., &Rivizzigno, V. L. (1982). Comparing objective and cognitive representations of environmental cues. In R. G. Golledge & J. N. Raynor (Eds.),Proximity and preference: Problems in the multidimensional analysis of large data sets. (pp. 233–266). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gordon, A. D., Jupp, P. E., &Byrne, R. W. (1989). The construction and assessment of mental maps.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,42, 169–182.
Haber, R. N., Haber, L. R., Levin, C. A., &Hollyfield, R. (1993). Properties of spatial representations: Data from sighted and blind subjects.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 1–13.
Howard, J. H., &Kerst, S. M. (1981). Memory and perception of cartographic information for familiar and unfamiliar environments.Human Factors,23, 495–504.
Huertas, J. A., &Ochaita, E. (1992). The externalization of spatial representation by blind persons.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,86, 398–402.
Kitchin, R. M. (1996). Methodological convergence in cognitive mapping research: Investigating configurational knowledge.Journal of Environmental Psychology,16, 163–185.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pick, H. L., &Fariello, G. R. (1974). Cognitive maps in children and men.Child Development,45, 707–716.
Kruskal, J.B. (1964a). Multidimensional scaling: A numerical method.Psychometrica,29, 115–129.
Kruskal, J. B. (1964b). Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis.Psychometrica,29, 1–27.
Kruskal, J. B., &Wish, M. (1978).Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kuipers, B. (1982). The “map in the head” metaphor.Environment & Behavior,14, 202–220.
Lockman, J. J., Rieser, J. J., &Pick, H. L. (1981). Assessing blind travelers’ knowledge of spatial layout.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness,75, 321–326.
MacKay, D. B. (1976). The effect of spatial stimuli on the estimation of cognitive maps.Geographical Analysis,8, 439–452.
Magaña, J. R, Evans, G. W., &Romney, A. K. (1981). Scaling techniques in the analysis of environmental cognition data.Professional Geographer,33, 294–301.
Montello, D. R. (1991). The measurement of cognitive distance: Methods and construct validity.Journal of Environmental Psychology,11, 101–122.
Nakaya, T. (1997). Statistical inferences in bidimensional regression models.Geographical Analysis,29, 169–186.
O’Keefe, J., &Nadel, L. (1978).The hippocampusas a cognitive map. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Regian, J. W., &Yadrick, R. M. (1994). Assessment of configurational knowledge of naturally- and artificially-acquired large-scale space.Journal of Environmental Psychology,14, 211–223.
Richardson, G. D. (1981). Comparing two cognitive mapping methodologies.Area,13, 325–331.
Sadalla, E. K., Burroughs, W. J., &Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 516–528.
Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., &Young, F. W. (1981).Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.
Shanno, D. F. (1970). Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization.Mathematics of Computation,24, 647–656.
Sharrack, B., &Hughes, R. A. C. (1997). Reliability of distance estimation by doctors and patients: Cross sectional study.British Medical Journal,315, 1652–1654.
Shepard, R. N. (1962a). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function: I.Psychometrika,27, 125–140.
Shepard, R. N. (1962b). The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function: II.Psychometrika,27, 219–246.
Shepard, R. N. (1980). Multidimensional scaling, tree-fitting, and clustering.Science,210, 390–398.
Shepard, R. N., Romney, A. K., &Nerlove, S. B. (1972).Multidimensional scaling: Theory and applications in the behavioral science: Vol. 2. Applications. New York: Seminar Press.
Sherman, R. C., Croxton, J., &Giovanatto, J. (1979). Investigating cognitive representations of spatial relationships.Environment & Behavior,11, 209–226.
Tobler, W. (1976). The geometry of mental maps. In R. G. Golledge & G. Rushton (Eds.),Spatial choice and spatial behavior: Geographic essays on the analysis of preferences and perceptions (pp. 69–81). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Tobler, W. (1994). Bidimensional regression.Geographical Analysis,26, 187–212.
Tobler, W. (1996). A graphical introduction to survey adjustment.Cartographica,33, 33–42.
Torgerson, W. S. (1952). Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method.Psychometrika,17, 401–419.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review,84, 327–352.
Tversky, A., &Gati, I. (1982). Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality.Psychological Review,89, 123–154.
Wakabayashi, Y. (1994) Spatial analysis of cognitive maps.Geographical Reports of Tokyo Metropolitan University,29, 57–102.
Waller, D. (2000). Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,6, 307–321.
Waller, D., Beall, A. C., & Loomis, J. M. (2002).Using virtual environments to assess directional knowledge. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Walsh, D. A., Krauss, I. K., &Regnier, V. A. (1981). Spatial ability, environmental knowledge, and environmental use: The elderly. In L. Liben, A. Patterson, & N. Newcombe (Eds.),Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application (pp. 321–357). New York: Academic Press.
Wender, K. F., Wagener-Wender, M., &Rothkegel, R. (1997). Measures of spatial memory and routes of learning.Psychological Research,59, 269–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted with supportfrom the U.S. National Science Foundation, Grant 9873432.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Waller, D., Haun, D.B.M. Scaling techniques for modeling directional knowledge. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35, 285–293 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202554
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202554