Abstract
One recent conceptualization of the process of lexical access, the basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) hypothesis, has been developed from a number of separate empirical and theoretical sources, and implicates distinct characteristics of the word recognition process. Using a lexical decision]priming paradigm, the present study tested all such characteristics simultaneously, together with a control condition in which simple sequences of letters were repeated within pairs of words, occupying different serial positions in each member of a pair. No evidence was obtained to suggest that BOSSs enjoy a special psychological status. Yet evidence from the same experiment suggests that words are processed via multiletter units in the lexical decision task, and that these units are not position specific, because they produce facilitation even when presented in different serial positions across primes and targets. Two interpretations of this position-insensitive orthographic priming are presented.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., &Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage. Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, E. J., &Guinet, L. (1971). Perception of Inflections in brief visual presentations of words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 183–189.
Hansen, D., &Rodgers, T. S. (1968). An exploration of psycholinguistic units in initial reading. In K. S. Goodman (Ed.),The psycholinguistic nature of the reading process (59–102). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Henderson, L., Wallis, J., &Knight, D. (1984). Morphemic structure and lexical access. In H. Bouma & D. G Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X. Control of language processes (pp. 211–226). London: Erlbaum
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. (1980). Experimental tests of a hierarchical model of word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 503–524.
Lima, S. D., &Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) reconsidered.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 310–332.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Function of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1975). Loci of contextual effects on word recognition. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Domic (Eds),Attention and performance V(pp. 98–118). New York: Academic Press.
Murrell, G. A., &Morton, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 963–968.
Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.
Oliphant, G. W. (1983). RepeUtion and recency effects in word recognition.Australian Journal of Psychology,35, 393–403.
Rosson, M. B. (1983). From SOFA to LOUCH. Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation.Memory & Cognition,11, 152–160.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S. S., &Rubenstein, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 645–657.
Rubenstein, H., Richter, M. L., &Kay, E. J. (1975). Pronounce-ability and the visual recognition of nonsense words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 651–657.
Rubin, G. S., Becker, C. A., &Freeman, R. H. (1979). Morphological structure and its effect on visual word recognition.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 757–767.
Rumelhart, D. E., &McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects m letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review,89, 60–94.
Shulman, H. G., Hornak, R., &Sanders, E. (1978). The effects of graphemic, phonetic, and semantic relationships on access to lexical structures.Memory & Cognition,6, 115–123.
Smith, P. T., Meredith, T. R., Pattison, H. M., &Sterling, C. M. (1984). The representation of internal word structure in English. In L. Henderson (Ed.),Orthographies and reading (pp. 103–120) London: Erlbaum.
Spoehr, K., &Smith, E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,5, 71–89.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., Hernon, W. P., &Hall, R. (1979). Memory representation for morphologically related words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 399–412.
Stanners, R. F., Neiser, J. J., &Painton, S. (1979) Memory representation for prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 733–743.
Taft, M. (1979a). Lexical access via an orthographic code. The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39
Taft, M. (1979b). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect.Memory & Cognition,7, 263–272.
Taft, M. (1981). Prefix stripping revisited.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 289–297
Taft, M. (1984). Exploring the mental lexicon.Australian Journal of Psychology,36, 35–46.
Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.),Reading research (Vol 5, pp. 83–123). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 638–647
Taft, M., &Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 607–620.
Van Der Molen, H., &Morton, J. (1979). Remembering plurals: Unit of coding and form of coding during serial recall.Cognition,7, 35–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a British Science and Engineering Research Council postgraduate studentship and by Grant No. G8408210N from the British Medical Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jordan, T.R. Testing the BOSS hypothesis: Evidence for position-insensitive orthographic priming in the lexical decision task. Mem Cogn 14, 523–532 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202523
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202523