Abstract
The prototype effect in face recognition refers to a tendency to recognize the face corresponding to the central value of a series of seen faces, even when this central value or prototype has not been seen. Five experiments investigated the extension and limits of this phenomenon. In all the experiments, participants saw a series of faces, each one in two or more different versions or exemplars, and then performed a recognition test, including seen and unseen exemplars and the unseen prototype face. In Experiment 1, a strong prototype effect for variations in feature location was demonstrated in oldness ratings and in a standard old/new recognition test. Experiments 2A and 2B compared the prototype effect for variations in feature location and variations in head angle and showed that, for the latter, the prototype effect was weaker and more dependent on similarity than for the former. These results suggest that recognition across feature variations is based on an averaging mechanism, whereas recognition across viewpoint variations is based on an approximation mechanism. Experiments 3A and 3B examined the limits of the prototype effect using a face morphing technique that allows a systematic manipulation of face similarity. The results indicated that, as the similarity between face exemplars decreases to the level of similarity between the faces of different individuals, the prototype effect starts to disappear. At the same time, the prototype effect may originate false memories of faces that were never seen.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., &Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces.Memory & Cognition,12, 219–228.
Bruce, V. (1994). Stability from variation: The case of face recognition. The M. D. Vernon Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 5–28.
Bruce, V. (1995). [Prototype formation across head-angle variations]. Unpublished raw data.
Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., &Dench, N. (1994). What’s distinctive about a distinctive face?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,47A, 119–141.
Bruce, V., Cowey, A., Ellis, A. W., &Perrett, D. I. (1992).Processing the facial image. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., &Burton, M. (1991). Remembering facial configurations.Cognition,38, 109–144.
Bruce, V., Valentine, T., &Baddeley, A. (1987). The basis for the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,1, 109–120.
Bülthoff, H., &Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,89, 60–64.
Craw, I., Kato, T., Costen, N., &Robertson, G. (1994).Methods for improving principal component analysis coding of faces for recognition: A testbed (TR-H No. 104). Kyoto: ATR Human Information Processing Research Laboratories.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Franks, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 65–74.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Homa, D., Cross, J., Cornell, D., Goldman, D., &Schwartz, S. (1973). Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 116–122.
Homa, D., Dunbar, S., &Nohre, L. (1991). Instance frequency, categorization, and the modulating effect of experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 444–458.
Homa, D., Goldhardt, B., Burruel-Homa, L., &Carson Smith, J. (1993). Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition.Memory & Cognition,21,529–5388.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of prototypical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,2, 322–330.
Inn, D., Walden, K. J., &Solso, R. L. (1993). Facial prototype formation in children.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 197–200.
Light, L.L., Kayra-Stuart, F. &Hollender, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 212–228.
Malpass, R. S., &Hughes, K. D. (1986). Formation of facial prototypes. In H. D. Ellis, M. A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, & A. Young (Eds.),Aspects of face processing (pp. 154–162). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Neumann, P. G. (1977). Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability.Memory & Cognition,5, 187–197.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 700–708.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 3–27.
Perrett, D. I., Mistlin, A. J., &Chitty, A. J. (1989). Visual neurones responsive to faces.Trends in Neurosciences,10, 358–384.
Poggio, T., &Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects.Nature,343, 263–266.
Posner, M. I., Goldsmith, R., &Welton, K. E., Jr. (1967). Perceived distance and classification of distorted patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 304–308.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Anes, M. D. (1997). Illusory memories in amnesic patients: Conceptual and perceptual false recognition.Neuropsychology,11, 331–342.
Solso, R. L., Heck, M., &Mearns, C. (1993). Prototype formation in very short-term memory.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,31, 185–188.
Solso, R. L., &McCarthy, J. E. (1981). Prototype formation of faces: A case study of pseudo-memory.British Journal of Psychology,72, 499–503.
Solso, R. L., &Raynis, S. A. (1979). Prototype formation of imaged, kinesthetically and visually presented geometric forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 701–712.
Vokey, J. R., &Read, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.Memory & Cognition,20, 291–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The experiments described in this paper were conducted while the first author held a postdoctoral post at ATR labs, and the second author was in receipt of a collaborative research award from ATR.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabeza, R., Bruce, V., Kato, T. et al. The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits. Mem Cogn 27, 139–151 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201220
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201220