Abstract
In the present experiment, we evaluated the effects of individual differences in reading span and variation in memory demands on class-inclusion performance. One hundred twenty college students whose reading spans ranged from low to medium to high (as indexed by a computerized version of the Daneman and Carpenter [1980] reading-span task) solved 48 class-inclusion problems. Half of the subjects had the solution information available when the problems were presented; the other half performed a detection task between solution information and problem presentation. The results from both standard statistical analyses and from a mathematical model indicated that differences in reading span and memory load had predictable, similar effects. Specifically, the sophistication of reasoning strategies declined when memory demands increased or when reading spans decreased. Surprisingly, these effects were primarily additive. The results were interpreted in terms of global resource models and findings from the developmental literature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual-differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1101–1114.
Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., &Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 1–18.
Hodkin, B. (1987). Performance analysis in class inclusion: An illustration with two language conditions.Developmental Psychology,23, 683–689.
Howe, M. L., &Rabinowitz, F. M. (1989). On the uninterpretability of dual-task performance.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,47, 32–38.
Howe, M. L., &Rabinowitz, F. M. (1990). Resource panacea? Or just another day in the developmental forest.Developmental Review,10, 125–154.
Howe, M. L., &Rabinowitz, F. M. (1994). Dynamic modeling, chaos, and cognitive development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,58, 184–199.
Howe, M. L., &Rabinowitz, F. M. (1996). Reasoning from memory: A lifespan inquiry into the necessity of remembering when reasoning about class inclusion.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,61, 1–42.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992).Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Perlmutter, N. J., &MacDonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in syntactic ambiguity resolution.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 521–542.
Rabinowitz, F. M. (1995). Algorithm 744: A stochastic algorithm for global optimization with constraints.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software,21, 194–213.
Rabinowitz, F. M., Howe, M. L., &Lawrence, J. A. (1989). Class inclusion and working memory.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 379–409.
Siddal, J. N., &Bonham, D. J. (1974).Optimization subroutine package. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Swanson, H. L. (1996). Individual and age-related differences in children’s working memory.Memory & Cognition,24, 70–82.
Waters, G. S., &Caplan, D. (1996). Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences.Memory & Cognition,24, 342–355.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by Grants OGP0003334 (to M.L.H.) and OGP0002017 (to F.M.R.) from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
—Accepted by previous associate editor Kathryn T. Spoehr
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howe, M.L., Rabinowitz, F.M. & Powell, T.L. Individual differences in working memory and reasoning-remembering relationships in solving class-inclusion problems. Mem Cogn 26, 1089–1101 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201185
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201185