Abstract
This comment corrects some inaccuracies, points to some methodological problems, and makes three substantive observations regarding the Altarriba and Soltano (1996) article. First, token individuation theory does not explain what is new and interesting in the Altarriba and Soltano data, namely cross-language semantic facilitation in lists and a list-sentence effect, that is, a large difference in the effect of semantic repetition when identical translation equivalents occurred in sentences versus lists. Second, Altarriba and Soltano’s small and nonsignificant semantic blindness effect for translation equivalents in split-language sentences is attributable to the peculiar nature of their materials, procedures, analyses, and experimental design. These problems nullify their conclusion that semantic blindness does not occur, and we discuss several clear cases where semantic blindness has been demonstrated. Finally, we suggest an explanation for Altarriba and Soltano’s unexplained effects (cross-language facilitation and the list-sentence effect) and show why these effects are important for the general issue of relations between language and memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrams, L., Dyer, J. R., &MacKay, D. G. (1996). Repetition blindness interacts with syntactic grouping in rapidly presented sentences.Psychological Science,7, 100–104.
Altarriba, J., &Soltano, E. G. (1996). Repetition blindness and bilingual memory: Token individuation for translation equivalents.Memory & Cognition,24, 700–711.
Bavelier, D. (1994). Repetition blindness between visually different items: The case of pictures and words.Cognition,51, 199–236.
Caplan, D., &Waters, G. S. (1990). Short-term memory and language comprehension: A critical review of the psychological literature. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice (Eds.),Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 337–389). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dubois-Charlier, F., Pritchard, D. R., Senerth, D. T., &Sola, J. M. (1987).The American Heritage Larousse Spanish dictionary: English/Spanish (1st ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gathercole, S. E., &Baddeley, A. D. (1993).Working memory and language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation.Cognition,27, 117–143.
Kanwisher, N. G. (1991). Repetition blindness and illusory conjunctions: Errors in binding visual types with visual tokens.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 404–421.
Kanwisher, N. G., &Potter, M. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 30–47.
MacKay, D. G. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior.Psychological Review,89, 483–506.
MacKay, D. G. (1987).The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag.
MacKay, D. G. (1990). Perception, action, and awareness: A three body problem. In W. Prinz & O. Neumann (Eds.),Relationships between perception and action (pp. 269–303). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
MacKay, D. G. (in press). The stages of processing metatheory and the relation between perception, action, and memory. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham (Eds.),A companion to cognitive science. Oxford: Blackwell.
MacKay, D. G., & Abrams, L. (1994, November).Chunking and repetition deficits challenge capacity theories and the single attachment principle. Paper presented at the 35th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St. Louis.
MacKay, D. G., &Bowman, R. W. (1969). On producing the meaning in sentences.American Journal of Psychology,82, 23–39.
MacKay, D. G., &Miller, M. D. (1992).Semantic blindness: Repetition suppression at the semantic level. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
MacKay, D. G., &Miller, M. D. (1994). Semantic blindness: Rapidly presented repeated concepts are difficult to encode and recall.Psychological Science,5, 52–55.
MacKay, D. G., & Miller, M. D. (in press). Can cognitive aging contribute to fundamental psychological theory? Repetition deafness as a test case.Aging, Cognition & Neuropsychology.
MacKay, D. G., Miller, M. D., &Schuster, S. P. (1994). Repetition blindness and aging: Evidence for a binding deficit involving a single, theoretically-specified connection.Psychology & Aging,9, 251–258.
Miller, M. D., &MacKay, D. G. (1994). Repetition deafness: Repeated words in computer compressed speech are difficult to encode and recall.Psychological Science,5, 47–51.
Miller, M. D., & MacKay, D. G. (in press). Relations between language and memory: The case of repetition deafness.Psychological Science.
Monsell, S. (1984). Components of working memory underlying verbal skills: A “distributed capacities” view. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 327–350). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Park, J., &Kanwisher, N. (1994). Determinants of repetition blindness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 500–519.
Saffran, E. M. (1990). Short-term memory impairment and language processing. In A. Caramazza (Ed.),Cognitive neuropsychology and neurolinguistics: Advances in models of cognitive function and impairment (pp. 137–168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Nosofsky, R. M. (1994). Seven plus or minus two: A commentary on capacity limitations.Psychological Review,101, 357–361.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support from National Institute for Aging Grant 5 R01 AG 09755 to D.G.M., National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowships to L.A. and M.M., and a National Research Service Award to M.M. is gratefully acknowledged.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
MacKay, D.G., Abrams, L., Pedroza, M.J. et al. Cross-language facilitation, semantic blindness, and the relation between language and memory: A reply to Altarriba and Soltano. Mem Cogn 24, 712–718 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201096
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201096